Literature DB >> 28932913

A prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating the short-term outcomes of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization versus tissue-selecting technique.

A L H Leung1, T P P Cheung2, K Tung2, Y P Tsang2, H Cheung2, C W Lau2, C N Tang2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tissue-selecting technique (TST) is a novel stapled hemorrhoidectomy technique which targets the hemorrhoids, leaving uninvolved mucosal bridges intact and avoiding circumferential circular stapling. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes of TST and transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD).
METHODS: Patients presenting with symptomatic hemorrhoids were recruited. Patients were randomized into two groups: (1) TST and (2) THD. Patient demographics, perioperative data, postoperative pain scores, recurrence and patient satisfaction scores were evaluated. Patients with acute thrombosed hemorrhoids, external hemorrhoids only, or other concomitant anal diseases were excluded.
RESULTS: From January 2013 to December 2015, 80 patients were included in the study, 40 in each group. There were no significant differences between groups as regards demographic data, perioperative data and postoperative pain scores. The median symptom scores for bleeding and prolapse were significantly lower in the TST group at 1 year (bleeding 1 vs. 2, p = 0.001; prolapse 1 vs. 2, p = 0.025). There was significantly less recurrence requiring reintervention in the TST group (4/40 vs. 17/40, p = 0.001). Satisfaction was significantly greater after TST. The median satisfaction scores after TST and THD were 4 and 3 (on a scale of 1-4; 4 = excellent satisfaction) (p < 0.00001), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Both THD and TST are safe, and they appear to have similar short-term outcomes; however, TST is associated with better improvement in symptoms, lower recurrence rates and greater patient satisfaction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy; Hemorrhoidectomy; Hemorrhoids; Partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy; Tissue-selecting technique; Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28932913     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-017-1669-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  37 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review comparing transanal haemorrhoidal de-arterialisation to stapled haemorrhoidopexy in the management of haemorrhoidal disease.

Authors:  M S Sajid; U Parampalli; P Whitehouse; P Sains; M R McFall; M K Baig
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  The tissue-selecting technique: segmental stapled hemorrhoidopexy.

Authors:  Hong-Cheng Lin; Lei Lian; Shang-Kui Xie; Hui Peng; Jian-Dong Tai; Dong-Lin Ren
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization is an alternative to operative hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  N Sohn; J S Aronoff; F S Cohen; M A Weinstein
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Cost-effectiveness of New Surgical Treatments for Hemorrhoidal Disease: A Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Transanal Doppler-guided Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation With Mucopexy and Circular Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy.

Authors:  Paul A Lehur; Anne S Didnée; Jean-Luc Faucheron; Guillaume Meurette; Philippe Zerbib; Laurent Siproudhis; Béatrice Vinson-Bonnet; Anne Dubois; Christine Casa; Jean-Benoit Hardouin; Isabelle Durand-Zaleski
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Clinical observations on the treatment of prolapsing hemorrhoids with tissue selecting therapy.

Authors:  Zhi-Gang Wang; Yong Zhang; Xian-Dong Zeng; Tie-Hui Zhang; Qi-Dong Zhu; De-Long Liu; Yun-Yu Qiao; Nan Mu; Zhi-Tao Yin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing clinical outcomes and effectiveness of surgical treatments for haemorrhoids.

Authors:  C Simillis; S N Thoukididou; A A P Slesser; S Rasheed; E Tan; P P Tekkis
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Long-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs conventional hemorrhoidectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Pasquale Giordano; Gianpiero Gravante; Roberto Sorge; Lauren Ovens; Piero Nastro
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2009-03

8.  A randomized trial of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with anopexy compared with open hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids.

Authors:  Solveig E Elmér; Jonas O Nygren; Claes E Lenander
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Prospective evaluation of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation for stage II and III haemorrhoids: three-year outcomes.

Authors:  P Giordano; P Nastro; A Davies; G Gravante
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 10.  Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures.

Authors:  M Pescatori; G Gagliardi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 3.781

View more
  6 in total

1.  A prospective randomized trial on transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization versus stapler hemorrhoidectomy: methodological issues that need to be clarified.

Authors:  S Biondo; L Trenti; E Kreisler; C Ratto
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Short-term outcomes of transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization versus tissue-selecting technique.

Authors:  Y Bashir; Q Ulain; E Eguare
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Interventional treatments for prolapsing haemorrhoids: network meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Z Jin; S Bhat; K-T Lee; W Xia; A G Hill
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-09-06

4.  Outcomes of Modified Tissue Selection Therapy Stapler in the Treatment of Prolapsing Hemorrhoids.

Authors:  Chenchen Yuan; Chongjun Zhou; Rong Xue; Xiaofeng Jin; Chun Jin; Chenguo Zheng
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-03

5.  Partial Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy Versus Circumferential Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy for Grade III to IV Prolapsing Hemorrhoids: A Randomized, Noninferiority Trial.

Authors:  Hong-Cheng Lin; Qiu-Lan He; Wan-Jin Shao; Xin-Lin Chen; Hui Peng; Shang-Kui Xie; Xiao-Xue Wang; Dong-Lin Ren
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 6.  A systematic review of the literature assessing the outcomes of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus open haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Q Z Ruan; W English; A Hotouras; C Bryant; F Taylor; S Andreani; S D Wexner; S Banerjee
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 3.781

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.