Literature DB >> 25741159

Clinical observations on the treatment of prolapsing hemorrhoids with tissue selecting therapy.

Zhi-Gang Wang1, Yong Zhang1, Xian-Dong Zeng1, Tie-Hui Zhang1, Qi-Dong Zhu1, De-Long Liu1, Yun-Yu Qiao1, Nan Mu1, Zhi-Tao Yin1.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare the effects and postoperative complications between tissue selecting therapy stapler (TST) and Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (M-M).
METHODS: Four hundred and eighty patients with severe prolapsing hemorrhoids, who were admitted to the Shenyang Coloproctology Hospital between 2009 and 2012, were randomly divided into observation (n=240) and control (n=240) groups. Hemorrhoidectomies were performed with TST in the observation group and with the M-M technique in the control group. The therapeutic effects, operation security, and postoperative complications in the two groups were compared. The immediate and long-term complications were assessed according to corresponding criteria. Pain was assessed on a visual analogue scale. The efficacy was assessed by specialized criteria. The follow-up was conducted one year after the operation.
RESULTS: The total effective rates of the observation and control groups were 99.5% (217/218) and 98.6% (218/221) respectively; the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.322). Their were significant differences between observation and control groups in intraoperative blood loss (5.07±1.14 vs 2.45±0.57, P=0.000), pain (12 h after the surgery: 5.08±1.62 vs 7.19±2.01, P=0.000; at first dressing change: 2.64±0.87 vs 4.34±1.15, P=0.000; first defecation: 3.91±1.47 vs 5.63±1.98, P=0.001), urine retention (n=22 vs n=47, P=0.001), anal pendant expansion after the surgery (2.35±0.56 vs 5.16±1.42, P=0.000), operation time (18.3±5.6 min vs 29.5±8.2 min, P=0.000), and the length of hospital stay (5.3±0.6 d vs 11.4±1.8 d, P=0.000). Moreover TST showed significant reductions compared to M-M in the rates of long-term complications such as fecal incontinence (n=3 vs n=16, P=0.003), difficult bowel movement (n=1 vs n=9, P=0.011), intractable pain (n=2 vs n=12, P=0.007), and anal discharge (n=3 vs n=23, P=0.000).
CONCLUSION: TST for severe prolapsing hemorrhoids is a satisfactory technique for more rapid recovery, lower complication rates, and higher operation security.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complication rate; Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy; Operation security; Severe prolapsing hemorrhoids; Tissue selecting therapy stapler

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25741159      PMCID: PMC4342928          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i8.2490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  13 in total

1.  The nature of haemorrhoids.

Authors:  W H Thomson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 2.  Stapled haemorrhoidopexy compared to Milligan-Morgan and Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  K Laughlan; D G Jayne; D Jackson; F Rupprecht; G Ribaric
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Long-term results after stapled hemorrhoidopexy: high patient satisfaction despite frequent postoperative symptoms.

Authors:  P Fueglistaler; M O Guenin; I Montali; B Kern; R Peterli; M von Flüe; C Ackermann
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  The Whitehead hemorrhoidectomy. An unjustly maligned procedure.

Authors:  B G Wolff; C E Culp
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  M J Cheetham; N J Mortensen; P O Nystrom; M A Kamm; R K Phillips
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-08-26       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy under local anesthesia - an old operation that stood the test of time. A single-team experience with 2,280 operations.

Authors:  Samuel Argov; Olga Levandovsky; Danielle Yarhi
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Primary and repeated stapled hemorrhoidopexy for prolapsing hemorrhoids: follow-up to five years.

Authors:  Dennis Raahave; Lars V Jepsen; Ib K Pedersen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-01-19       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  The pathogenesis of hemorrhoids.

Authors:  P A Haas; T A Fox; G P Haas
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 9.  Forward-view Endoscopic Ultrasound: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications.

Authors:  Pietro Fusaroli; Liza Ceroni; Giancarlo Caletti
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.628

Review 10.  Endosonography-assisted diagnosis and therapy of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors.

Authors:  Jintao Guo; Zhijun Liu; Siyu Sun; Sheng Wang; Nan Ge; Xiang Liu; Guoxin Wang; Wen Liu
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.628

View more
  13 in total

1.  A prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating the short-term outcomes of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization versus tissue-selecting technique.

Authors:  A L H Leung; T P P Cheung; K Tung; Y P Tsang; H Cheung; C W Lau; C N Tang
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Evaluation of the clinical efficacy and safety of TST33 mega hemorrhoidectomy for severe prolapsed hemorrhoids.

Authors:  Liu Tao; Jun Wei; Xu-Feng Ding; Li-Jiang Ji
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 1.534

3.  A novel technique for the treatment of stages III to IV hemorrhoids: Homemade anal cushion suspension clamp combined with harmonic scalpel.

Authors:  Guoqiang Lin; Qiongxiang Ge; Xiaokang He; Haixin Qi; Li Xu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Treatment of Prolapsing Hemorrhoids in HIV-Infected Patients with Tissue-Selecting Technique.

Authors:  Zhe Fan; Yingyi Zhang
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2017-03-05       Impact factor: 2.260

5.  Early Experience With a Partial Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy for Treating Patients With Grades III-IV Prolapsing Hemorrhoids.

Authors:  Hyeonseok Jeong; Sunghwan Hwang; Kil O Ryu; Jiyong Lim; Hyun Tae Kim; Hye Mi Yu; Jihoon Yoon; Ju-Young Lee; Hyoung Rae Kim; Young Gil Choi
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2017-02-28

6.  Modified procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids: Lower recurrence, higher satisfaction.

Authors:  Yan-Yu Chen; Yi-Fan Cheng; Quan-Peng Wang; Bo Ye; Chong-Jie Huang; Chong-Jun Zhou; Mao Cai; Yun-Kui Ye; Chang-Bao Liu
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 1.337

7.  Treatment of hemorrhoids with individualized homeopathy: An open observational pilot study.

Authors:  Kaushik Deb Das; Shubhamoy Ghosh; Asim Kumar Das; Aloke Ghosh; Ramkumar Mondal; Tanapa Banerjee; Seikh Sajid Ali; Seikh Swaif Ali; Munmun Koley; Subhranil Saha
Journal:  J Intercult Ethnopharmacol       Date:  2016-06-25

8.  Partial Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy Versus Circular Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy.

Authors:  Jin Sub Kim
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2017-02-28

9.  Partial Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy Versus Circumferential Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy for Grade III to IV Prolapsing Hemorrhoids: A Randomized, Noninferiority Trial.

Authors:  Hong-Cheng Lin; Qiu-Lan He; Wan-Jin Shao; Xin-Lin Chen; Hui Peng; Shang-Kui Xie; Xiao-Xue Wang; Dong-Lin Ren
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 10.  A systematic review of the literature assessing the outcomes of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus open haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Q Z Ruan; W English; A Hotouras; C Bryant; F Taylor; S Andreani; S D Wexner; S Banerjee
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.