Literature DB >> 28932285

Comparison of the hospital costs for two-stage reimplantation for deep infection, single-stage revision and primary total elbow arthroplasty.

Eric R Wagner1, Jeanine E Ransom1, Hilal Maradit Kremers1, Mark Morrey1, Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to determine the cost of two-stage reimplantation for the treatment of deep infection after total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) and compare this with primary and aseptic revision TEA.
METHODS: Three hundred and seventy-one primary TEA and 286 revision TEAs (including 47 elbows requiring two-stage reimplantation) were performed. Total direct medical costs during each hospitalization were obtained from our institutional research database and compared for three groups: primary TEA, revision for nonseptic reasons and two-stage reimplantation for deep infection.
RESULTS: The mean cost of an uncomplicated primary TEA and aseptic revision TEA was $18,464 and $18,796, respectively. The mean overall cost associated with two-stage reimplantation increased to $34,286. Two-stage reimplantation increased both Part A (hospital costs) and Part B (professional costs). The mean Part A cost for septic revision TEA was $29,102 versus $15,844 for primary TEA. The mean Part B cost for septic revision TEA was $5,184 versus $2,621 for primary TEA.
CONCLUSIONS: Two-stage reimplantation for treatment of an infected TEA costs 186% the hospital cost of a primary uncomplicated or aseptic revision TEA. The overall cost to society is even greater if we take into account the cost of antibiotic therapy in between stages and lost days from work.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cost; infection; revision total elbow arthroplasty; septic

Year:  2017        PMID: 28932285      PMCID: PMC5598824          DOI: 10.1177/1758573217706364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shoulder Elbow        ISSN: 1758-5732


  17 in total

1.  Survivorship and radiological analysis of the standard Souter-Strathclyde total elbow arthroplasty.

Authors:  I A Trail; D Nuttall; J K Stanley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-01

2.  Maintaining a hip registry for 25 years. Mayo Clinic experience.

Authors:  D J Berry; M Kessler; B F Morrey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  GSB III total elbow replacement in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  M Cesar; Y Roussanne; F Bonnel; F Canovas
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-03

4.  Outcomes of total elbow arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis: comparative study of three implants.

Authors:  Christopher P Little; Alastair J Graham; Georgios Karatzas; David A Woods; Andrew J Carr
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Indications and reoperation rates for total elbow arthroplasty: an analysis of trends in New York State.

Authors:  David M Gay; Stephen Lyman; Huong Do; Robert N Hotchkiss; Robert G Marx; Aaron Daluiski
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  The Souter-Strathclyde elbow arthroplasty. A clinical and radiological study of 525 consecutive cases.

Authors:  M Ikävalko; M U K Lehto; A Repo; H Kautiainen; M Hämäläinen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-01

7.  Survivorship of the KUDO total elbow prosthesis--comparative study of cemented and uncemented ulnar components: 89 cases followed for an average of 6 years.

Authors:  Huub J L van der Heide; Maarten J de Vos; J-Martijn Brinkman; Denise Eygendaal; Frank H J van den Hoogen; Maarten C de Waal Malefijt
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Determinants of direct medical costs in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hilal Maradit Kremers; Sue L Visscher; James P Moriarty; Megan S Reinalda; Walter K Kremers; James M Naessens; David G Lewallen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Reimplantation of a total elbow prosthesis following resection arthroplasty for infection.

Authors:  Emilie V Cheung; Robert A Adams; Bernard F Morrey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  A comparison of open reduction and internal fixation and primary total elbow arthroplasty in the treatment of intraarticular distal humerus fractures in women older than age 65.

Authors:  Mark A Frankle; Dolfi Herscovici; Thomas G DiPasquale; Matthew B Vasey; Roy W Sanders
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.512

View more
  4 in total

1.  One- and two-stage surgical revision of infected elbow prostheses following total joint replacement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Setor K Kunutsor; Andrew D Beswick; Michael R Whitehouse; Ashley W Blom
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Evaluation of factors driving cost variation for distal humerus open reduction internal fixation.

Authors:  Michelle Zeidan; Andrew R Stephens; Chong Zhang; Angela P Presson; Andrew R Tyser; Nikolas H Kazmers
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-10-31

3.  Comparison of direct surgical cost for humeral shaft fracture fixation: open reduction internal fixation versus intramedullary nailing.

Authors:  Andrew R Stephens; Angela P Presson; Chong Zhang; Brian Orleans; Mike Martin; Andrew R Tyser; Nikolas H Kazmers
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-04-30

Review 4.  Total Elbow Arthroplasty: Clinical Outcomes, Complications, and Revision Surgery.

Authors:  Jae-Man Kwak; Kyoung-Hwan Koh; In-Ho Jeon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-11-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.