| Literature DB >> 28931970 |
Ji Liu1, Cindy Soo Yun Tan1,2, Yang Lan1, Oren A Scherman1.
Abstract
The success of exploiting cucurbit[n]uril (CB[n])-based molecular recognition in self-assembled systems has sparked a tremendous interest in polymer and materials chemistry. In this study, polymerization in the presence of host-guest complexes is applied as a modular synthetic approach toward a diverse set of CB[8]-based supramolecular hydrogels with desirable properties, such as mechanical strength, toughness, energy dissipation, self-healing, and shear-thinning. A range of vinyl monomers, including acrylamide-, acrylate-, and imidazolium-based hydrophilic monomers, could be easily incorporated as the polymer backbones, leading to a library of CB[8] hydrogel networks. This versatile strategy explores new horizons for the construction of supramolecular hydrogel networks and materials with emergent properties in wearable and self-healable electronic devices, sensors, and structural biomaterials.Entities:
Keywords: cucurbit[n]uril; host‐guest systems; hydrogels; in situ polymerization; self healing; supramolecular hydrogel network; toughness
Year: 2017 PMID: 28931970 PMCID: PMC5575522 DOI: 10.1002/pola.28667
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Polym Sci A Polym Chem ISSN: 0887-624X Impact factor: 2.702
Figure 1(a,b) In situ polymerization of supramolecular polymer networks in the presence of macrocyclic host cucurbit[8]uril (CB[8]) and polymerizable guest molecules (1‐benzyl‐3‐vinylimidazolium bromide) and a hydrophilic co‐monomer. The CB[8] supramolecular ternary conjugates serve as dynamic crosslinkers, leading to a network structure after photo‐initiated polymerization at room temperature. They also act as sacrificial bonds that rupture (OFF state) under deformation and dissipate energy, which can further re‐form (ON state), resulting in the self‐healing of a macroscopic supramolecular network. (c) Photographs of the supramolecular hydrogel networks from different co‐monomers, as well as the corresponding inverted‐vial demonstration of their viscosities. Note: acrylamide (AAm), N‐isopropylacrylamide (NIPAm), 2‐(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate contains (DMAEMA), acrylic acid (AA), 1‐vinyl‐3‐ethylimidazolium bromide (ViEt), 3‐[2‐(methacryloyloxy)ethyl](dimethyl)ammonio‐1‐propanesulfonate (MPS), poly(ethylene glycol) methacrylate (PEGMA), dimethylacrylamide (DMA), and N‐hydroxyethyl acrylamide (HEAm). [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 2G′ and G″ values of the HEAm‐based CB[8] hydrogel network via dynamic room‐temperature (a) amplitude sweep (from 10−1 to 103 % strain, 10 rad s−1) and (b) frequency sweep (from 10−2 to 102 rad s−1, 1% strain). [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 3(a) Thermal stability of the HEAm‐based CB[8] hydrogel network during cyclic heating and cooling process between 0 and 80 °C; (b) continuous step‐strain measurements of the network sample at 20 °C (high‐amplitude oscillatory parameters: strain γ = 500%, angular frequency ω = 10 rad s−1, low‐amplitude oscillatory parameters: γ = 0.5%, ω = 10 rad s−1). [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]