Literature DB >> 289292

The concept of pattern in craniofacial growth.

R E Moyers, F L Bookstein, K E Guire.   

Abstract

1. There are semantic and associated problems with the word pattern in biology, particularly in orthodontics and facial growth. 2. Pattern, as we use the term, is invariance of relationships--"a set of constraints operating to preserve the integration of parts under varying conditions and through time." 3. Craniofacial pattern can be described and quantified by the identification of craniofacial constants, measures that are relatively invariant. 4. Growth is change and is best identified by studying those measures of size and shape that vary most sensitively through time over development stages. 5. The many traditional cephalometric measures that represent well neither pattern nor growth (mixed) are of less clinical utility than either pure pattern indices or growth indices. 6. The analytical and conceptual separation of pattern and growth seems useful in analysis of morphology, analysis of growth, prediction of growth, and clinical treatment planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 289292     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(79)90115-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod        ISSN: 0002-9416


  9 in total

1.  Morphometric analysis of treatment effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction in growing Class III patients.

Authors:  T Baccetti; H J De Clerck; L H Cevidanes; L Franchi
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Reconsidering "The inappropriateness of conventional cephalometrics".

Authors:  Fred L Bookstein
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Facial surface morphology predicts variation in internal skeletal shape.

Authors:  Nathan M Young; Krunal Sherathiya; Luis Gutierrez; Emerald Nguyen; Sona Bekmezian; John C Huang; Benedikt Hallgrímsson; Janice S Lee; Ralph S Marcucio
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Shape changes during human fetal craniofacial growth.

Authors:  M J Trenouth
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Automatic Classification for Sagittal Craniofacial Patterns Based on Different Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  Haizhen Li; Ying Xu; Yi Lei; Qing Wang; Xuemei Gao
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31

6.  Assessment of maxillary position. Implant vs cephalometric methods.

Authors:  Panisha Verayannont; Urban Hägg; Ricky W K Wong; Colman McGrath; Shadow Yeung
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Cephalometric measurements performed on CBCT and reconstructed lateral cephalograms: a cross-sectional study providing a quantitative approach of differences and bias.

Authors:  Benedetta Baldini; Davide Cavagnetto; Gianluca Martino Tartaglia; Giuseppe Baselli; Chiarella Sforza
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  Cephalometric study to test the reliability of anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy indicators using the twin block appliance.

Authors:  Rahul Trivedi; Amit Bhattacharya; Falguni Mehta; Dolly Patel; Harshik Parekh; Vaibhav Gandhi
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.750

9.  Establishment of norms of the beta angle to assess the sagittal discrepancy for Nellore district population.

Authors:  Mandava Prasad; Karnati Praveen Kumar Reddy; Ashok Kumar Talapaneni; Nellore Chaitanya; Myla Vijay Bhaskar Reddy; Rajendra Patil
Journal:  J Nat Sci Biol Med       Date:  2013-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.