| Literature DB >> 28928826 |
Tao Pu1, Liqin Xiong2, Qiyu Liu1, Minxing Zhang1, Qingqing Cai3, Haiou Liu3, Anil K Sood4,5, Guiling Li1,6, Yu Kang1,3, Congjian Xu1,3,6.
Abstract
Lymph node metastasis occurs in early-stage and late-stage ovarian cancers. Systematic lymphadenectomy is frequently conducted in an attempt to prevent disease progression. However, this method is associated with multiple complications. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a less invasive and more sensitive method for detecting lymphatic metastasis in ovarian cancer. The aim of the present study was to develop an appropriate fluorescent label for the analysis of lymphatic metastasis in vivo. To this end, epithelial ovarian cancer cells with high potential for lymph node metastasis were labeled using mCherry fluorescence. The cells were then imaged in vitro to determine the expression of mCherry, and in a mouse xenograft model in vivo. The data demonstrated the successful identification of metastatic retroperitoneal lymph nodes by co-localization with lymph nodes labeled by near-infrared fluorescence nanoparticles in vivo. These data provided important insights into the further development of methods for intra-operative identification of lymphatic metastasis and the mechanisms underlying lymphatic metastasis.Entities:
Keywords: metastatic cancer; nanoparticles; near-infrared fluorescence imaging; ovarian cancer; retroperitoneal lymph nodes
Year: 2017 PMID: 28928826 PMCID: PMC5588176 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.6521
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 2.967
Figure 1.Morphology and signal gradient of fluorescently labeled epithelial ovarian cancer. Cells were visualized under a fluorescence microscope (A) without and (B) with a fluorescence filter (×100 magnification). (C) An 11.4 kb vector for lentivirus fluorescent labeling. (D) Fluorescence signal gradient detected using the IVIS Spectrum imaging system (column B), with negative control (column C). (E) Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis of mCherry fluorescence. LTR, long terminal repeat; Amp', ampicillin; p CMV, cytomegalovirus promotor; p mU6, mouse U6 promotor; p Ubi, ubiquitin promotor; IRES, internal ribosome entry site; Puro', puromycin.
Figure 2.Morphology, parameters and localization of NIR nanoparticles. (A) Average diameter of NIR nanoparticles, determined using transmission electron microscopy. (B) Excitation and emission parameters of NIR nanoparticles. (C) ζ potential analysis of NIR nanoparticles. (D) Localization of the lymph nodes with nanoparticles (in blue circles). Field of view, 10×10 cm2. NIR, near-infrared; UV, ultraviolet; N LN, lymph nodes in the neck region; Sub (L), subiliac lymph nodes in the left side; Sub (R), subiliac lymph nodes in the right side; R LN, retroperitoneal lymph nodes.
Figure 3.MCherry and nanoparticle fluorescent signals in the mouse model. (A) Flowchart of metastatic retroperitoneal lymph node imaging in the xenograft mouse model. (B) Representative image of the fluorescence signal of mCherry for tumor cells (blue circle and blue triangle). (C) Representative image of the fluorescence signal of nanoparticles (blue circle) for lymph nodes and potential lymphatic vessels (blue triangle). (D) Spatial overlapping signals for the localization of metastatic lymph nodes (red, mCherry signals; green, nanoparticle signals; indicated by the blue circle) using light spectrum unmixing software. (E) Corresponding gross anatomy of the retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Field of view, 10×10 cm2.
Figure 4.Staining of imaging-positive lymph nodes. H&E staining of imaging-positive lymph nodes at (A) ×100 and (B) ×400 magnification. IHC analysis of human CK8 in imaging-positive lymph nodes at (C) ×100 and (D) ×400 magnification. IHC analysis of human CK7 in imaging-positive lymph nodes at (E) ×100 and (F) ×400 magnification. Positive staining of tumor cells was sporadically distributed. H&E, hematoxylin and eosin; IHC, immunohistochemistry; CK, cytokeratin.