Janet Stifter1, Vanessa E C Sousa1, Alessandro Febretti2, Karen Dunn Lopez3, Andrew Johnson4, Yingwei Yao5, Gail M Keenan6, Diana J Wilkie7. 1. Postdoctoral Scholar at the College of Nursing. 2. PhD Candidate at the Department of Computer Science, College of Engineering. 3. Assistant Professor at the College of Nursing. 4. Associate Professor and Director of Research at the Electronic Visualization Laboratory, Department of Computer Science, College of Engineering. 5. Research Associate Professor at the College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, and at the College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. 6. Adjunct Professor at the College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, and the Annabel Davis Jenks Endowed Professor for Teaching and Research in Nursing Clinical Excellence at the College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. 7. Adjunct Professor at the College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, and Professor at Prairieview Trust - Earl and Margo Powers Endowed Professor, and Director of the Academic Center of Excellence in Palliative Care Research and Education, College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the acceptability, usefulness, and ease of use for four nursing clinical decision support interface prototypes. METHODS: In a simulated hospital environment, 60 registered nurses (48 female; mean age = 33.7 ± 10.8; mean years of experience = 8.1 ± 9.7) participated in a randomized study with four study groups. Measures included acceptability, usefulness, and ease of use scales. FINDINGS:Mean scores were high for acceptability, usefulness, and the ease of use for all four groups. Inexperienced participants (<1 year) reported higher perceived ease of use (p = .05) and perceived usefulness (p = .01) than those with experience of 1 year or more. CONCLUSIONS: Participants completed the protocol and reported that all four interfaces, including the control (HANDS), were acceptable, easy to use, and useful. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING KNOWLEDGE: Further study is warranted before clinical implementation within the electronic health record.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To determine the acceptability, usefulness, and ease of use for four nursing clinical decision support interface prototypes. METHODS: In a simulated hospital environment, 60 registered nurses (48 female; mean age = 33.7 ± 10.8; mean years of experience = 8.1 ± 9.7) participated in a randomized study with four study groups. Measures included acceptability, usefulness, and ease of use scales. FINDINGS: Mean scores were high for acceptability, usefulness, and the ease of use for all four groups. Inexperienced participants (<1 year) reported higher perceived ease of use (p = .05) and perceived usefulness (p = .01) than those with experience of 1 year or more. CONCLUSIONS:Participants completed the protocol and reported that all four interfaces, including the control (HANDS), were acceptable, easy to use, and useful. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING KNOWLEDGE: Further study is warranted before clinical implementation within the electronic health record.
Authors: Thomas R Campion; Lemuel R Waitman; Nancy M Lorenzi; Addison K May; Cynthia S Gadd Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2011-10-21 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Joanne Wolfe; Liliana Orellana; E Francis Cook; Christina Ullrich; Tammy Kang; Jeffrey Russell Geyer; Chris Feudtner; Jane C Weeks; Veronica Dussel Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-03-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Diana J Wilkie; Young Ok Kim; Marie L Suarez; Colleen M Dauw; Stephen J Stapleton; Geraldine Gorman; Judith Storfjell; Zhongsheng Zhao Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Jennifer Stinson; Patrick McGrath; Ellen Hodnett; Brian Feldman; Ciaran Duffy; Adam Huber; Lori Tucker; Ross Hetherington; Shirley Tse; Lynn Spiegel; Sarah Campillo; Navreet Gill; Meghan White Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2010-07-29 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Catherine H Yu; Dawn Stacey; Joanna Sale; Susan Hall; David M Kaplan; Noah Ivers; Jeremy Rezmovitz; Fok-Han Leung; Baiju R Shah; Sharon E Straus Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2014-01-22 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Tasha M Schoppee; Brenda W Dyal; Lisa Scarton; Miriam O Ezenwa; Prashant Singh; Yingwei Yao; Marie L Suarez; Zaijie J Wang; Robert E Molokie; Diana J Wilkie Journal: Cancer Nurs Date: 2020 Sep/Oct Impact factor: 2.592
Authors: Hwayoung Cho; Gail Keenan; Olatunde O Madandola; Fabiana Cristina Dos Santos; Tamara G R Macieira; Ragnhildur I Bjarnadottir; Karen J B Priola; Karen Dunn Lopez Journal: JMIR Hum Factors Date: 2022-05-10