Literature DB >> 2892457

Long term follow-up of patients with side to side choledochoduodenostomy and transduodenal sphincteroplasty.

A R Baker1, J P Neoptolemos, T Leese, D C James, D P Fossard.   

Abstract

From a consecutive series of 190 patients with choledochoduodenostomy (CDD) and 56 patients with transduodenal sphincteroplasty (TDS), there were 10 and 3 hospital deaths respectively. A long term follow-up study was performed on the remainder. Late deaths occurred in 35 CDD and 5 TDS patients. Serious long term complications occurred in 3.3% of CDD cases, comprising 5 cases of 'sump syndrome' and a further case of cholangitis in the presence of a clear biliary tree. Cholangitis occurred in 2 of the TDS patients (3.8%). Recurrent common duct stones were found in 3 of the 'sump syndrome' cases (1.6%) and one of the TDS patients with cholangitis (1.9%). Eighty-eight per cent of the CDD patients and 90.2% of the TDS patients, who were reviewed, were subjectively well. Serum alkaline phosphatase was raised in 21.6% of the CDD patients and only 3.4% of the TDS group (P less than 0.05). Radiological studies showed that the CDD stoma admitted air and barium more often than the TDS stoma (P less than 0.001). Neither the biochemical nor the radiological findings correlated with the long term symptomatic results of the two procedures. Dynamic HIDA scans showed a shorter time to peak activity in the common hepatic duct for both CDD (P less than 0.01) and TDS (P less than 0.05) as compared with endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES). These long-term clinical, biochemical and radiological results are similar to those reported following ES.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2892457      PMCID: PMC2498515     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  20 in total

1.  Epidemiology of cancer of the pancreas.

Authors:  E L Wynder; K Mabuchi; N Maruchi; J G Fortner
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Bacterial flora in the duodenum of patients after biliary fenestration.

Authors:  E Thomas; A K Grant; M Holford; D Ringwood; A W Derrington; J R Magarey
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1973-02       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  The significance of biliary pressure in cholangitis.

Authors:  T Huang; J A Bass; R D Williams
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1969-05

4.  Recurrent cholangitis after biliary surgery.

Authors:  L D Goldman; M L Steer; W Silen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Surgical approaches to recurrent choledocholithiasis. Choledochoduodenostomy versus T-tube drainage after choledochotomy.

Authors:  N J Lygidakis
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  [Long term results after endoscopic sphincterotomy].

Authors:  E Seifert; K Gail; J Weismüller
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1982-04-23       Impact factor: 0.628

7.  Transduodenal papillostomy as a routine procedure in managing choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  V Speranza; E Lezoche; S Minervini; F Carlei; N Basso; M Simi
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1982-07

8.  Unexpected problems of external choledochoduodenostomy. Fiberscopic examination in 15 patients.

Authors:  H Akiyama; H Ikezawa; S Kameya; M Iwasaki; Y Kuroda; T Takeshita
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Effects of sphincteroplasty and endoscopic sphincterotomy on the bacteriologic characteristics of the common bile duct.

Authors:  J A Gregg; P De Girolami; D L Carr-Locke
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Choledochoduodenostomy, choledochojejunostomy or sphincteroplasty for biliary and pancreatic disease.

Authors:  D P Vogt; R E Hermann
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Choledochoduodenostomy. Analysis of 71 cases followed for 5 to 15 years.

Authors:  A Escudero-Fabre; A Escallon; J Sack; N B Halpern; J S Aldrete
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Management of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Eric S Hungness; Nathaniel J Soper
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Chronic pancreatitis with biliary obstruction: Assessors' comments.

Authors:  J Neoptolemos
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 4.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy in the young patient: is there cause for concern?

Authors:  T C Tham; D L Carr-Locke; J S Collins
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Choledochoduodenostomy: is it really so bad?

Authors:  William McIver Leppard; Thomas Michael Shary; David B Adams; Katherine A Morgan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  A modified Rendezvous ERCP technique in duodenal diverticulum.

Authors:  Mehmet Odabasi; Mehmet Kamil Yildiz; Haci Hasan Abuoglu; Cengiz Eris; Erkan Ozkan; Emre Gunay; Ali Aktekin; Ma Tolga Muftuoglu
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-11-16

7.  Biliary strictures complicating pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  B J Ammori; S Joseph; M Attia; J P Lodge
Journal:  Int J Pancreatol       Date:  2000-08

8.  Current assessment of choledochoduodenostomy: 130 consecutive series.

Authors:  H Okamoto; K Miura; J Itakura; H Fujii
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Recurrent bile duct stones after transduodenal sphincteroplasty.

Authors:  S M G Kibria; R Hall
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  Various techniques for the surgical treatment of common bile duct stones: a meta review.

Authors:  Abolfazl Shojaiefard; Majid Esmaeilzadeh; Ali Ghafouri; Arianeb Mehrabi
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 2.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.