Literature DB >> 2039295

Choledochoduodenostomy. Analysis of 71 cases followed for 5 to 15 years.

A Escudero-Fabre1, A Escallon, J Sack, N B Halpern, J S Aldrete.   

Abstract

To investigate the long-term effectiveness of choledochoduodenostomy (CDD), the experience with 71 patients followed for 5 or more years after CDD was analyzed retrospectively. From 1968 to 1984, 134 patients underwent CDD. Eight patients (6%) died in the immediate postoperative period, 55 left the hospital, 8 of them were lost to follow-up, and 47 were followed but died before 5 years elapsed after CDD. The remaining 71 patients form the data base for this analysis: 38 were followed for more than 5 years, 25 were followed for more than 10 years, and 8 were followed for more than 15 years (mean 12.1 years +/- 1.3 SEM). Choledocholithiasis, chronic pancreatitis, and postoperative stricture were the indications for CDD. Cholangitis was observed in only three patients. The diameter of the common bile duct (CBD) was large in most patients (mean 18 mm +/- 0.9 SEM). These results infer that CDD is effective to treat non-neoplastic obstructing lesions of the distal CBD on a long-term basis and that the presence of a dilated CBD (more than 16 mm) that allows the construction of a CDD more than 14 mm is essential to obtain good results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2039295      PMCID: PMC1358593          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199106000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  43 in total

1.  OBSTRUCTIVE (SURGICAL) JAUNDICE: AN ANALYSIS OF 140 CONSECUTIVE CASES AND A CONSIDERATION OF CHOLEDOCHODUODENOSTOMY IN ITS TREATMENT.

Authors:  J L MADDEN; J A GRUWEZ; P Y TAN
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  External choledochoduodenostomy. An evaluation of 125 cases.

Authors:  W M CAPPER
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1961-11       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Side-to-side choledochoduodenostomy.

Authors:  S O Hoerr; R E Hermann
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Effectiveness of choledochoduodenostomy and transduodenal sphincterotomy in the treatment of benign obstruction of the common duct.

Authors:  C G Thomas; C P Nicholson; J Owen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Surgical approaches to recurrent choledocholithiasis. Choledochoduodenostomy versus T-tube drainage after choledochotomy.

Authors:  N J Lygidakis
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Applications of choledochoduodenostomy in biliary tract obstruction.

Authors:  D E Fry; E Buchignani; H C Polk; W Ahmad; P J Harbrecht
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 0.688

7.  [Review of 50 cases of choledochoduodenostomy].

Authors:  A M Taschieri; M G Sandri; C Crosta; F Percio; A L Rossi; V Scortecci
Journal:  Minerva Chir       Date:  1985-05-31       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Choledochoduodenostomy--a useful procedure in the management of benign disorders of the biliary tract: a review of 53 cases.

Authors:  M Engelberg; I Avrahami; S Erdman; R Reiss
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 0.688

9.  The techniques of side-to-side choledochoduodenostomy.

Authors:  G A Degenshein; A Hurwitz
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1967-06       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Choledochoduodenostomy: importance of common duct size and occurrence of cholangitis.

Authors:  M A Kraus; S D Wilson
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1980-10
View more
  14 in total

1.  Long-term results of choledochoduodenostomy in benign biliary obstruction.

Authors:  Ajaz A Malik; Shiraz A Rather; Shams Ul Bari; Khursheed Alam Wani
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-02-27

Review 2.  Current management of biliary strictures.

Authors:  Jennifer G Hall; Theodore N Pappas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Management of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Eric S Hungness; Nathaniel J Soper
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  An audit of the outcome of long-term biliary stenting in the treatment of common bile duct stones in a general hospital.

Authors:  Tiing Leong Ang; Kwong Ming Fock; Eng Kiong Teo; Tju Siang Chua; Jessica Tan
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.527

5.  Choledochoduodenostomy: is it really so bad?

Authors:  William McIver Leppard; Thomas Michael Shary; David B Adams; Katherine A Morgan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Surgical treatments for patients with recurrent bile duct stones and Oddis sphincter laxity.

Authors:  Boxuan Zhou; Jinxiong Hu; Yuesi Zhong
Journal:  Intractable Rare Dis Res       Date:  2017-08

7.  Laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy as a reliable rescue procedure for complicated bile duct stones.

Authors:  Palanisamy Senthilnathan; Dhawal Sharma; Sandeep C Sabnis; S Srivatsan Gurumurthy; E Senthil Anand; V P Nalankilli; Natesan Anand Vijai; Palanivelu Praveen Raj; Ramakrishnan Parthasarathy; Subbaiah Rajapandian; Chinnusamy Palanivelu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Choledochoduodenostomy is a safe alternative to Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy for biliary reconstruction in liver transplantation.

Authors:  William Bennet; Michael A Zimmerman; Jeffrey Campsen; Mercedes Susan Mandell; Tom Bak; Michael Wachs; Igal Kam
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Endoscopic therapy for chronic pancreatitis: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  C Mel Wilcox; Shyam Varadarajulu
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2006-04

10.  Current assessment of choledochoduodenostomy: 130 consecutive series.

Authors:  H Okamoto; K Miura; J Itakura; H Fujii
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.