| Literature DB >> 28923011 |
Leeya F Pinder1, Kelsey H Natsuhara1,2, Thomas F Burke1,3,2, Svjetlana Lozo1, Monica Oguttu4, Leah Miller1, Brett D Nelson1,2, Melody J Eckardt5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Obstetric fistula devastates the lives of women and is found most commonly among the poor in resource-limited settings. Unrepaired third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations have been shown to be the source of approximately one-third of the fistula burden in fistula camps in Kenya. In this study, we assessed potential barriers to accurate identification by Kenyan nurse-midwives of these complex perineal lacerations in postpartum women.Entities:
Keywords: Developing countries; Kenya; Maternal health; Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS); Obstetric fistula; Obstetric laceration; Obstetric tear; Obstructed labor; Third- and fourth-degree perineal laceration
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28923011 PMCID: PMC5604156 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-017-1484-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ISSN: 1471-2393 Impact factor: 3.007
Participant Demographics
| Maternal Health Trainers and their sub-counties of origin | |
|---|---|
| Alego Usonga | 2 (9.1%) |
| Bondo | 6 (27.3%) |
| Gem | 4 (18.2%) |
| Rarieda | 1 (4.5%) |
| Siaya | 3 (13.6%) |
| Ugenya | 2 (9.1%) |
| Ugunja | 4 (18.2%) |
| Gender (n = 22) | |
| Female | 12 (54.5%) |
| Male | 10 (45.5%) |
| Mean years of post-training experience (n = 22) | 16.0 (± 9.0) |
| < 5 years | 1 |
| 5–9 years | 4 |
| > 10 years | 11 |
| No response | 6 |
| Deliveries performed in the prior month ( | |
| Collective total | 369 |
| Mean per person | 24.6 ± 22.5 |
| Mean number of tears repaired in the prior month ( | |
| First- or second-degree repairs | 2.2 ± 3.3 |
| Third- or fourth-degree repairs | 0.05 ± 0.2 |
Participants’ experience with third- and fourth-degree obstetric lacerations
| Prevalence | |
|---|---|
| Routinely perform rectal exams on all patients after delivery ( | 2 (10.0%) |
| Perceive a good understanding of the muscles that can be damaged during delivery ( | 11 (52.4%) |
| Previous training in perineal tear evaluation ( | 14 (63.6%) |
| Previous training specifically in third- and fourth-degree tear evaluation ( | 4 (18.2%) |
| Comfortable repairing a third- or fourth-degree tear (n = 22) | 0 (0.0%) |
| Reported evaluation of tears after delivery was challenging ( | 20 (90.9%) |
| Specific challenges to perineal evaluation following delivery (Open Response) | (n = 22) |
| Staff shortage / workload | 13 (59.1%) |
| Inadequate or broken supplies | 12 (54.5%) |
| Deliveries occurring at night | 9 (40.9%) |
| Inadequate light source | 8 (36.4%) |
| Lack of pain control | 1 (4.5%) |
| Distance in km to nearest referral center for complex repair (excluding providers based at a referral center) ( | 25.3 ± 10.8 |
| Distance ≤ 10 km | 2 |
| Distance 10-20 km | 2 |
| Distance >20 km | 11 |
| No response | 1 |
| Participants with system to follow-up on patients who have been referred for repair (n = 20) | 12 (60.0%) |
Participant scores on pictorial laceration assessment
| Skill assessed ( | Mean percent of pictorial questions answered correctly |
|---|---|
| Classification of laceration as either simple (first/second-degree) or complex (third/fourth-degree) (9 images) | 76.1 ± 15.3 |
| Identification of laceration as third/fourth- degree (8 images.) | 69.9 ± 17.5 |
| Identification of structures of the anal sphincter complex (5 images) | 26.4 ± 25.7 |
| Recognition of the anus or rectal mucosa when it is torn (2 images) | 25.0 ± 25.6 |
| Identification of the sphincter muscle (not specific to internal or external) (3 images) | 21.2 ± 28.3 |
| Overall anatomical structure identification (10 images) | 16.4 ± 16.0 |