Ariel Hay1, Heather L Howie1, Hayley R Waterman1, Karen de Wolski1, James C Zimring1,2,3. 1. BloodworksNW Research Institute, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington. 2. Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington. 3. Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Donor variability of red blood cell (RBC) storage has been observed in both humans and animal models. We utilized a strain of mice with RBCs known to store well (B6) and a strain known to store poorly (FVB) to test the hypothesis that RBCs affected the storage of other RBCs. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Five strains of mice were used: 1) transgenic B6 mice expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) in their RBCs (GFP.B6), 2) wild-type B6 mice, 3) wild-type FVB mice, 4) F1 crosses between GFP.B6 and FVB mice (GFP.F1), and 5) the analogous wild-type (B6xFVB) F1 cross. GFP.B6 or GFP.F1 RBCs were mixed with wild-type (non-GFP) RBCs from B6 or FVB strains before storage. Twenty-four-hour RBC recoveries were determined for stored RBCs by enumerating circulating GFP+ RBCs by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Twenty-four-hour recoveries of GFP.F1 RBCs was increased by co-storage with B6 RBCs but decreased by co-storage with FVB RBCs. This effect was dose dependent when tested with GFP.B6 RBCs; the more FVB blood added, the worse the 24-hour recoveries became. RBC cross-regulation did not occur when B6 and FVB RBCs were separated by a semipermeable membrane with a 0.4-µm size cutoff. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate that RBCs affect the storage of other RBCs, in both positive and negative directions, indicating not only that RBC storage is intrinsic to the RBC but that RBC-RBC communication occurs. Additional studies will be required to determine the nature of this effect and if these findings translate into human RBC storage.
BACKGROUND:Donor variability of red blood cell (RBC) storage has been observed in both humans and animal models. We utilized a strain of mice with RBCs known to store well (B6) and a strain known to store poorly (FVB) to test the hypothesis that RBCs affected the storage of other RBCs. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Five strains of mice were used: 1) transgenic B6 mice expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) in their RBCs (GFP.B6), 2) wild-type B6 mice, 3) wild-type FVB mice, 4) F1 crosses between GFP.B6 and FVB mice (GFP.F1), and 5) the analogous wild-type (B6xFVB) F1 cross. GFP.B6 or GFP.F1 RBCs were mixed with wild-type (non-GFP) RBCs from B6 or FVB strains before storage. Twenty-four-hour RBC recoveries were determined for stored RBCs by enumerating circulating GFP+ RBCs by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Twenty-four-hour recoveries of GFP.F1 RBCs was increased by co-storage with B6 RBCs but decreased by co-storage with FVB RBCs. This effect was dose dependent when tested with GFP.B6 RBCs; the more FVB blood added, the worse the 24-hour recoveries became. RBC cross-regulation did not occur when B6 and FVB RBCs were separated by a semipermeable membrane with a 0.4-µm size cutoff. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate that RBCs affect the storage of other RBCs, in both positive and negative directions, indicating not only that RBC storage is intrinsic to the RBC but that RBC-RBC communication occurs. Additional studies will be required to determine the nature of this effect and if these findings translate into human RBC storage.
Authors: Heather L Howie; Meghan Delaney; Xiaohong Wang; Lay See Er; Gestur Vidarsson; Tamara C Stegmann; Linda Kapp; Jenna N Lebedev; Yanyun Wu; James P AuBuchon; James C Zimring Journal: Transfusion Date: 2016-09-16 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Erin M M Weisenhorn; Thomas J van T Erve; Nicholas M Riley; John R Hess; Thomas J Raife; Joshua J Coon Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2016-10-24 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Karen de Wolski; Xiaoyoun Fu; Larry J Dumont; John D Roback; Hayley Waterman; Katherine Odem-Davis; Heather L Howie; James C Zimring Journal: Haematologica Date: 2016-02-26 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Nicole H Smith; Kate L Henry; Chantel M Cadwell; Ashley Bennett; Jeanne E Hendrickson; Tom Frame; James C Zimring Journal: Transfusion Date: 2012-04-12 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Sean R Stowell; Nicole H Smith; James C Zimring; Xiaoyun Fu; Andre F Palmer; Jorge Fontes; Uddyalok Banerjee; Mark H Yazer Journal: Transfusion Date: 2013-02-05 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Christopher R Gilson; Teresa S Kraus; Eldad A Hod; Jeanne E Hendrickson; Steven L Spitalnik; Christopher D Hillyer; Beth H Shaz; James C Zimring Journal: Transfusion Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Tamir Kanias; Derek Sinchar; David Osei-Hwedieh; Jeffrey J Baust; Andrew Jordan; James C Zimring; Hayley R Waterman; Karen S de Wolski; Jason P Acker; Mark T Gladwin Journal: Transfusion Date: 2016-08-09 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: James C Zimring; Nicole Smith; Sean R Stowell; Jill M Johnsen; Lauren N Bell; Richard O Francis; Eldad A Hod; Jeanne E Hendrickson; John D Roback; Steven L Spitalnik Journal: Transfusion Date: 2013-05-30 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Lorenzo Bertolone; Micaela Kalani Roy; Ariel M Hay; Evan J Morrison; Davide Stefanoni; Xiaoyun Fu; Tamir Kanias; Steve Kleinman; Larry J Dumont; Mars Stone; Travis Nemkov; Michael P Busch; James C Zimring; Angelo D'Alessandro Journal: Transfusion Date: 2020-04-27 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Julie A Reisz; Vassilis L Tzounakas; Travis Nemkov; Artemis I Voulgaridou; Issidora S Papassideri; Anastasios G Kriebardis; Angelo D'Alessandro; Marianna H Antonelou Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2018-01-11