Literature DB >> 27632931

Serological blind spots for variants of human IgG3 and IgG4 by a commonly used anti-immunoglobulin reagent.

Heather L Howie1, Meghan Delaney1,2, Xiaohong Wang1, Lay See Er1, Gestur Vidarsson3, Tamara C Stegmann3, Linda Kapp1, Jenna N Lebedev1, Yanyun Wu1, James P AuBuchon1,2, James C Zimring1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Human immunoglobulin G (IgG) includes four different subtypes (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4), and it is also now appreciated that there are genetic variations within IgG subtypes (called isoallotypes). Twenty-nine different isoallotypes have been described, with 7, 4, 15, and 3 isoallotypes described for IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4, respectively. The reactivity of anti-IgG with different isoallotypes has not been characterized. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A novel monoclonal anti-K antibody (PugetSound Monoclonal Antibody 1 [PUMA1]) was isolated and sequenced, and a panel of PUMA1 variants was expressed, consisting of the 29 known IgG isoallotypes. The resulting panel of antibodies was preincubated with K-positive red blood cells (RBCs) and then subjected to testing with currently approved anti-IgG by flow cytometry, solid phase systems, gel cards, and tube testing.
RESULTS: A US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved monoclonal anti-IgG (gamma-clone) failed to recognize 2 of 15 IgG3 isoallotypes (IgG3-03 and IgG3-13) and 3 of 3 IgG4 isoallotypes (IgG4-01, IgG4-02, and IgG4-03). In contrast, an FDA-approved rabbit polyclonal anti-IgG recognized each of the known human IgG isoallotypes.
CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate "blind spots" in isoalloantibody detection by a monoclonal anti-IgG. If a patient has anti-RBC antibodies predominantly of an IgG3 subtype (the IgG3-03 and/or IgG3-13 variety), then it is possible that a clinically significant alloantibody would be missed. IgG-03 and IgG-13 have an estimated frequency of 1% to 3% in Caucasian populations and 20% to 30% in certain African populations. Nonreactivity with IgG4 is a known characteristic of this monoclonal anti-IgG, but IgG4 isoallotypes have not been previously reported.
© 2016 AABB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27632931      PMCID: PMC5444903          DOI: 10.1111/trf.13812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  15 in total

1.  Erythrocyte autoantibodies, subclasses of IgG and autoimmune haemolysis.

Authors:  R J Sokol; S Hewitt; D J Booker; A Bailey
Journal:  Autoimmunity       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.815

2.  Correlation of monocyte-monolayer assay results, number of erythrocyte-bound IgG molecules, and IgG subclass composition in the study of red cell alloantibodies other than D.

Authors:  B Zupańska; E Brojer; J McIntosh; H Seyfried; P Howell
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.144

3.  The majority of human memory B cells recognizing RhD and tetanus resides in IgM+ B cells.

Authors:  Luciana Della Valle; Serge E Dohmen; Onno J H M Verhagen; Magdalena A Berkowska; Gestur Vidarsson; C Ellen van der Schoot
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 5.422

4.  An example of anti-Yta demonstrating a change in its clinical significance.

Authors:  J P AuBuchon; A Brightman; H J Anderson; B Kim
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.144

5.  Test cells for use with anti-IgG sub-typing antisera in the antiglobulin test.

Authors:  V I Rawlinson; F Stratton; A H Merry
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.157

6.  Red cell autoantibodies, multiple immunoglobulin classes, and autoimmune hemolysis.

Authors:  R J Sokol; S Hewitt; D J Booker; A Bailey
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Generation of transgenic mice with antithetical KEL1 and KEL2 human blood group antigens on red blood cells.

Authors:  Nicole H Smith; Kate L Henry; Chantel M Cadwell; Ashley Bennett; Jeanne E Hendrickson; Tom Frame; James C Zimring
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 3.157

8.  GM haplotype diversity of 82 populations over the world suggests a centrifugal model of human migrations.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Dugoujon; Serge Hazout; France Loirat; Bruno Mourrieras; Brigitte Crouau-Roy; Alicia Sanchez-Mazas
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.868

9.  Severe anaphylactic reactions following transfusions of platelets to a patient with anti-Ch.

Authors:  C M Westhoff; B D Sipherd; D E Wylie; L D Toalson
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 10.  IgG subclasses and allotypes: from structure to effector functions.

Authors:  Gestur Vidarsson; Gillian Dekkers; Theo Rispens
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 7.561

View more
  5 in total

1.  Errors in data interpretation from genetic variation of human analytes.

Authors:  Heather L Howie; Meghan Delaney; Xiaohong Wang; Lay See Er; Linda Kapp; Jenna N Lebedev; James C Zimring
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2017-07-06

2.  Murine red blood cells from genetically distinct donors cross-regulate when stored together.

Authors:  Ariel Hay; Heather L Howie; Hayley R Waterman; Karen de Wolski; James C Zimring
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2017-09-16       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  Affinity of human IgG subclasses to mouse Fc gamma receptors.

Authors:  Gillian Dekkers; Arthur E H Bentlage; Tamara C Stegmann; Heather L Howie; Suzanne Lissenberg-Thunnissen; James Zimring; Theo Rispens; Gestur Vidarsson
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 5.857

4.  Functional consequences of allotypic polymorphisms in human immunoglobulin G subclasses.

Authors:  Andrew R Crowley; Simone I Richardson; Marina Tuyishime; Madeleine Jennewein; Meredith J Bailey; Jiwon Lee; Galit Alter; Guido Ferrari; Lynn Morris; Margaret E Ackerman
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 3.330

5.  Antibodies to Low-Copy Number RBC Alloantigen Convert a Tolerogenic Stimulus to an Immunogenic Stimulus in Mice.

Authors:  Arijita Jash; Chomkan Usaneerungrueng; Heather L Howie; Annie Qiu; Chance John Luckey; James C Zimring; Krystalyn E Hudson
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 7.561

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.