| Literature DB >> 28920047 |
Shoko Nakano1, Junko Nakahira1, Yosuke Kuzukawa1, Toshiyuki Sawai1, Toshiaki Minami1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The forced oscillation technique (FOT) is a non-invasive means of measuring respiratory resistance and reactance. We tested our hypothesis that endotracheal intubation would cause more substantial preoperative increases in FOT parameters than a supraglottic airway device (SGD).Entities:
Keywords: Endotracheal Intubation; Forced Oscillation Technique; Respiratory Impedance; Supraglottic Airway Device
Year: 2016 PMID: 28920047 PMCID: PMC5554429 DOI: 10.5812/aapm.42964
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anesth Pain Med ISSN: 2228-7523
Patients’ Preoperative Demographic and Clinical Characteristics[a]
| ET (n = 23) | SGD (n = 17) | P Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0 (0.0) | 3 (17.6) | 0.069 |
|
| 6 (26.1) | 2 (14.3) | 0.438 |
|
| 65 ± 13 | 60 ± 13 | 0.222 |
|
| 161.3 ± 21.7 | 165.3 ± 7.7 | 0.859 |
|
| 68.1 ± 22.9 | 65.7 ± 16.1 | 0.621 |
|
| 1.7 ± 0.1 | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 0.707 |
|
| 3.5 ± 0.7 | 3.6 ± 0.8 | 0.833 |
|
| 104.0 ± 16.7 | 108.8 ± 16.2 | 0.963 |
|
| 3.4 ± 0.7 | 3.4 ± 0.8 | 0.985 |
|
| 101.7 ± 17.5 | 105.7 ± 14.3 | 0.724 |
|
| 2.5 ± 0.6 | 2.7 ± 0.6 | 0.986 |
|
| 91.7 ± 16.3 | 97.5 ± 13.3 | 0.762 |
|
| 74.9 ± 7.6 | 78.0 ± 5.7 | 0.817 |
|
| 76.2 ± 15.0 | 82.5 ± 12.3 | 0.691 |
Abbreviations: ET, endotracheal tube; FEV1.0, forced expiratory volume in the first second; FVC, forced vital capacity; SGD, supraglottic airway device; VC, vital capacity.
aValues are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or No. (%).
Preoperative Outcomes in the Endotracheal Intubation and Supraglottic Airway Device Groups[a,b,c]
| ET (n = 23) | SGD (n = 17) | P Value | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 90 ± 19 | 81 ± 22 | 0.757 | -43.32 to 33.60 |
|
| 46 ± 15 | 38 ± 17 | 0.822 | -35.10 to 29.16 |
|
| 600 ± 109 | 524 ± 125 | 0.052 | -153.70 to 0.73 |
|
| 2.30 ± 0.8 | 2.34 ± 0.61 | 0.863 | -0.50 to 0.42 |
|
| 5.64 ± 2.48 | 3.68 ± 1.20 | 0.002 | 0.74 to 3.17 |
|
| 3.33 ± 2.37 | 1.34 ± 0.87 | < 0.001 | 0.90 to 3.09 |
|
| 0.002 | |||
| Preoperative R20, cmH2O/L/s | 1.73 ± 0.50 | 1.83 ± 0.39 | 0.465 | -0.39 to 0.18 |
| Postoperative R20, cmH2O/L/s | 4.17 ± 1.91 | 2.76 ± 0.88 | 0.004 | 0.49 to 2.33 |
| Change in R20, cmH2O/L/s | 2.45 ± 1.78 | 0.93 ± 0.68 | < 0.001 | 0.69 to 2.35 |
|
| 0.002 | |||
| Preoperative R5-R20, cmH2O/L/s | 0.57±0.40 | 0.51 ± 0.38 | 0.604 | -0.19 to 0.31 |
| Postoperative R5-R20, cmH2O/L/s | 1.46±0.81 | 0.92 ± 0.52 | 0.015 | 0.11 to 0.97 |
| Change in R5-R20, cmH2O/L/s | 0.89 ± 0.82 | 0.41 ± 0.39 | 0.020 | 0.08 to 0.86 |
|
| 0.025 | |||
| Preoperative X5, cmH2O/L/s | -0.48 ± 0.38 | -0.54 ± 0.46 | 0.625 | -0.21 to 0.35 |
| Postoperative X5, cmH2O/L/s | -2.22 ± 1.55 | -1.47 ± 1.01 | 0.071 | -1.58 to 0.07 |
| Change in X5, cmH2O/L/s | -1.74 ± 1.49 | -0.92 ± 0.90 | 0.037 | -1.59 to -0.05 |
|
| 0.053 | |||
| Preoperative Fres, Hz | 8.83 ± 2.93 | 8.69 ± 3.43 | 0.894 | -1.97 to 2.24 |
| Postoperative Fres, Hz | 14.3 ± 4.89 | 11.8 ± 3.93 | 0.089 | -0.39 to 5.26 |
| Change in Fres, Hz | 5.44 ± 4.28 | 3.15 ± 2.56 | 0.042 | 0.09 to 4.50 |
|
| 0.056 | |||
| Preoperative ALX, cmH2O/L | 2.22 ± 2.10 | 2.61 ± 2.86 | 0.630 | -2.08 to 1.28 |
| Postoperative ALX cmH2O/L | 15.48 ± 11.97 | 8.59 ± 7.82 | 0.035 | 0.52 to 13.23 |
| Change in ALX, cmH2O/L | 13.24 ± 11.39 | 5.97 ± 6.67 | 0.016 | 1.44 to 13.10 |
|
| 0.019 |
Abbreviations: ALX, area of low respiratory reactance; ANCOVA, analysis of covariance; CI, confidence interval; ET, endotracheal tube; Fres, resonance frequency; R5, respiratory resistance at 5 Hz; R20, respiratory resistance at 20 Hz; SGD, supraglottic airway device; X5, respiratory reactance at 5 Hz.
aValues are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or No. (%).
bChange represents postoperative value minus preoperative value.
cP values were determined from the analysis of covariance comparing pre- and post-operative values between the groups.