Literature DB >> 28919165

Validation of the Vectra H1 portable three-dimensional photogrammetry system for facial imaging.

L Camison1, M Bykowski1, W W Lee1, J C Carlson2, J Roosenboom3, J A Goldstein4, J E Losee4, S M Weinberg5.   

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging using stereophotogrammetry has become increasingly popular in clinical settings, offering advantages for surgical planning and outcome evaluation. The handheld Vectra H1 is a low-cost, highly portable system that offers several advantages over larger stationary cameras, but independent technical validation is currently lacking. In this study, 3D facial images of 26 adult participants were captured with the Vectra H1 system and the previously validated 3dMDface system. Using error magnitude statistics, 136 linear distances were compared between cameras. In addition, 3D facial surfaces from each system were registered, heat maps generated, and global root mean square (RMS) error calculated. The 136 distances were highly comparable across the two cameras, with an average technical error of measurement (TEM) value of 0.84mm (range 0.19-1.54mm). The average RMS value of the 26 surface-to-surface comparisons was 0.43mm (range 0.33-0.59mm). In each case, the vast majority of the facial surface differences were within a ±1mm threshold. Areas exceeding ±1mm were generally limited to facial regions containing hair or subject to facial microexpressions. These results indicate that 3D facial surface images acquired with the Vectra H1 system are sufficiently accurate for most clinical applications.
Copyright © 2017 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D facial imaging; anthropometry; measurement error; stereophotogrammetry; validation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28919165      PMCID: PMC5803347          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  21 in total

1.  Digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: evaluation of anthropometric precision and accuracy using a Genex 3D camera system.

Authors:  Seth M Weinberg; Nicole M Scott; Katherine Neiswanger; Carla A Brandon; Mary L Marazita
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2004-09

Review 2.  Evolution of 3D surface imaging systems in facial plastic surgery.

Authors:  Chieh-Han John Tzou; Manfred Frey
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.918

3.  Anthropometric precision and accuracy of digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: comparing the Genex and 3dMD imaging systems with one another and with direct anthropometry.

Authors:  Seth M Weinberg; Sybill Naidoo; Daniel P Govier; Rick A Martin; Alex A Kane; Mary L Marazita
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.046

4.  Comparison of three methods of facial measurement.

Authors:  H Ghoddousi; R Edler; P Haers; D Wertheim; D Greenhill
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 2.789

5.  An adaptive irregular grid approach for 3D deformable image registration.

Authors:  Vladimir Pekar; Evgeny Gladilin; Karl Rohr
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Measurement precision and reliability in craniofacial anthropometry: implications and suggestions for clinical applications.

Authors:  R E Ward; P L Jamison
Journal:  J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol       Date:  1991 Jul-Sep

7.  Validation of a vision-based, three-dimensional facial imaging system.

Authors:  A Ayoub; A Garrahy; C Hood; J White; M Bock; J P Siebert; R Spencer; A Ray
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2003-09

8.  3D Stereophotogrammetric assessment of pre- and postoperative volumetric changes in the cleft lip and palate nose.

Authors:  B van Loon; T J Maal; J M Plooij; K J Ingels; W A Borstlap; A M Kuijpers-Jagtman; P H Spauwen; S J Bergé
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 2.789

9.  Completing the 3-dimensional picture.

Authors:  Christopher Lane; William Harrell
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 10.  3D digital stereophotogrammetry: a practical guide to facial image acquisition.

Authors:  Carrie L Heike; Kristen Upson; Erik Stuhaug; Seth M Weinberg
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 2.151

View more
  26 in total

1.  Improving tissue expansion protocols through computational modeling.

Authors:  Taeksang Lee; Elbert E Vaca; Joanna K Ledwon; Hanah Bae; Jolanta M Topczewska; Sergey Y Turin; Ellen Kuhl; Arun K Gosain; Adrian Buganza Tepole
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2018-03-29

2.  Reliability of periocular anthropometry using three-dimensional digital stereophotogrammetry.

Authors:  Yongwei Guo; Alexander C Rokohl; Friederike Schaub; Xiaoyi Hou; Jinhua Liu; Yue Ruan; Renbing Jia; Konrad R Koch; Ludwig M Heindl
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Are coding systems of frontal sinuses anatomically reliable? A study of correlation among morphological and metrical features.

Authors:  Daniele Gibelli; Michaela Cellina; Stefano Gibelli; Antonio Giancarlo Oliva; Giovanni Termine; Chiarella Sforza
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  Three-dimensional facial scanner in the hands of patients: validation of a novel application on iPad/iPhone for three-dimensional imaging.

Authors:  Yuming Chong; Xinyu Liu; Mai Shi; Jiuzuo Huang; Nanze Yu; Xiao Long
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-07

5.  Digital pair-matching of iliac bones: pilot study on a three-dimensional approach with models acquired through stereophotogrammetry.

Authors:  Andrea Palamenghi; Debora Mazzarelli; Annalisa Cappella; Danilo De Angelis; Chiarella Sforza; Cristina Cattaneo; Daniele Gibelli
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 2.791

6.  Three-dimensional quantification of skeletal midfacial complex symmetry.

Authors:  Nermin Morgan; Sohaib Shujaat; Omid Jazil; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 3.421

7.  Facial Anthropometry Measurements Using Three-Dimensional Stereophotogrammetry Analysis Among Nigerians.

Authors:  Adegbayi Adeola Adekunle; Abiodun Yusuff Olowo; Olutayo James; Olawale Olatubosun Adamson; Azeez A Alade; Failat Olushola Agbogidi; Afìsu O Oladega; Mobolanle Olugbemiga Ogunlewe; Wasiu Lanre Adeyemo; Tamara D Busch; Peter A Mossey; Mary L Marazita; Azeez Butali
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 1.172

8.  Mutant COMP shapes growth and development of skull and facial structures in mice and humans.

Authors:  Alexander Burger; Jasmien Roosenboom; Mohammad Hossain; Seth M Weinberg; Jacqueline T Hecht; Karen L Posey
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 2.473

9.  Three-dimensional facial morphology in Cantú syndrome.

Authors:  Helen I Roessler; Kathleen Shields; Dorothy K Grange; Nine V A M Knoers; Gijs van Haaften; Peter Hammond; Mieke M van Haelst
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 2.802

10.  Personalized Computational Models of Tissue-Rearrangement in the Scalp Predict the Mechanical Stress Signature of Rotation Flaps.

Authors:  Taeksang Lee; Sergey Y Turin; Casey Stowers; Arun K Gosain; Adrian Buganza Tepole
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2020-09-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.