Literature DB >> 28918937

A Predictive Model for Selective Targeting of the Warburg Effect through GAPDH Inhibition with a Natural Product.

Maria V Liberti1, Ziwei Dai2, Suzanne E Wardell2, Joshua A Baccile3, Xiaojing Liu2, Xia Gao2, Robert Baldi2, Mahya Mehrmohamadi1, Marc O Johnson4, Neel S Madhukar5, Alexander A Shestov6, Iok I Christine Chio7, Olivier Elemento5, Jeffrey C Rathmell4, Frank C Schroeder3, Donald P McDonnell2, Jason W Locasale8.   

Abstract

Targeted cancer therapies that use genetics are successful, but principles for selectively targeting tumor metabolism that is also dependent on the environment remain unknown. We now show that differences in rate-controlling enzymes during the Warburg effect (WE), the most prominent hallmark of cancer cell metabolism, can be used to predict a response to targeting glucose metabolism. We establish a natural product, koningic acid (KA), to be a selective inhibitor of GAPDH, an enzyme we characterize to have differential control properties over metabolism during the WE. With machine learning and integrated pharmacogenomics and metabolomics, we demonstrate that KA efficacy is not determined by the status of individual genes, but by the quantitative extent of the WE, leading to a therapeutic window in vivo. Thus, the basis of targeting the WE can be encoded by molecular principles that extend beyond the status of individual genes.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Warburg effect; cancer metabolism; glucose metabolism; metabolic control analysis; metabolic flux analysis; metabolomics; natural product; pharmacogenomics; precision medicine; systems biology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28918937      PMCID: PMC5629112          DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.08.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Metab        ISSN: 1550-4131            Impact factor:   27.287


  55 in total

Review 1.  Metabolic control analysis: a survey of its theoretical and experimental development.

Authors:  D A Fell
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1992-09-01       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  ZINC--a free database of commercially available compounds for virtual screening.

Authors:  John J Irwin; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  31P NMR saturation-transfer measurements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: characterization of phosphate exchange reactions by iodoacetate and antimycin A inhibition.

Authors:  S L Campbell-Burk; K A Jones; R G Shulman
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1987-11-17       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein.

Authors:  J Kyte; R F Doolittle
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1982-05-05       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 5.  The NCI60 human tumour cell line anticancer drug screen.

Authors:  Robert H Shoemaker
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 6.  The Warburg Effect: How Does it Benefit Cancer Cells?

Authors:  Maria V Liberti; Jason W Locasale
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 13.807

Review 7.  Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation.

Authors:  Matthew G Vander Heiden; Lewis C Cantley; Craig B Thompson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega.

Authors:  Fabian Sievers; Andreas Wilm; David Dineen; Toby J Gibson; Kevin Karplus; Weizhong Li; Rodrigo Lopez; Hamish McWilliam; Michael Remmert; Johannes Söding; Julie D Thompson; Desmond G Higgins
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 11.429

9.  Organization of enzyme concentration across the metabolic network in cancer cells.

Authors:  Neel S Madhukar; Marc O Warmoes; Jason W Locasale
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Quantitative determinants of aerobic glycolysis identify flux through the enzyme GAPDH as a limiting step.

Authors:  Alexander A Shestov; Xiaojing Liu; Zheng Ser; Ahmad A Cluntun; Yin P Hung; Lei Huang; Dongsung Kim; Anne Le; Gary Yellen; John G Albeck; Jason W Locasale
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  53 in total

1.  Distinct Regulation of Th17 and Th1 Cell Differentiation by Glutaminase-Dependent Metabolism.

Authors:  Marc O Johnson; Melissa M Wolf; Matthew Z Madden; Gabriela Andrejeva; Ayaka Sugiura; Diana C Contreras; Damian Maseda; Maria V Liberti; Katelyn Paz; Rigel J Kishton; Matthew E Johnson; Aguirre A de Cubas; Pingsheng Wu; Gongbo Li; Yongliang Zhang; Dawn C Newcomb; Andrew D Wells; Nicholas P Restifo; W Kimryn Rathmell; Jason W Locasale; Marco L Davila; Bruce R Blazar; Jeffrey C Rathmell
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Thermodynamic constraints on the regulation of metabolic fluxes.

Authors:  Ziwei Dai; Jason W Locasale
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  CARM1 suppresses de novo serine synthesis by promoting PKM2 activity.

Authors:  Tharindumala Abeywardana; Myungeun Oh; Lei Jiang; Ying Yang; Mei Kong; Jikui Song; Yanzhong Yang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Dimethyl fumarate targets GAPDH and aerobic glycolysis to modulate immunity.

Authors:  Michael D Kornberg; Pavan Bhargava; Paul M Kim; Vasanta Putluri; Adele M Snowman; Nagireddy Putluri; Peter A Calabresi; Solomon H Snyder
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Evolved resistance to partial GAPDH inhibition results in loss of the Warburg effect and in a different state of glycolysis.

Authors:  Maria V Liberti; Annamarie E Allen; Vijyendra Ramesh; Ziwei Dai; Katherine R Singleton; Zufeng Guo; Jun O Liu; Kris C Wood; Jason W Locasale
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Tumor-derived lactate induces M2 macrophage polarization via the activation of the ERK/STAT3 signaling pathway in breast cancer.

Authors:  Xianmin Mu; Wei Shi; Yue Xu; Che Xu; Ting Zhao; Biao Geng; Jing Yang; Jinshun Pan; Shi Hu; Chen Zhang; Juan Zhang; Chao Wang; Jiajia Shen; Yin Che; Zheng Liu; Yuanfang Lv; Hao Wen; Qiang You
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 4.534

7.  Glucose Metabolism in Cancer: The Saga of Pyruvate Kinase Continues.

Authors:  Annamarie E Allen; Jason W Locasale
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 31.743

8.  Quantitative Analysis of the Physiological Contributions of Glucose to the TCA Cycle.

Authors:  Shiyu Liu; Ziwei Dai; Daniel E Cooper; David G Kirsch; Jason W Locasale
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 27.287

9.  p300-Mediated Lysine 2-Hydroxyisobutyrylation Regulates Glycolysis.

Authors:  He Huang; Shuang Tang; Ming Ji; Zhanyun Tang; Miho Shimada; Xiaojing Liu; Shankang Qi; Jason W Locasale; Robert G Roeder; Yingming Zhao; Xiaoling Li
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  Perturbation of phosphoglycerate kinase 1 (PGK1) only marginally affects glycolysis in cancer cells.

Authors:  Chengmeng Jin; Xiaobing Zhu; Hao Wu; Yuqi Wang; Xun Hu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.