Literature DB >> 28918664

Outcomes of Surface Replacement Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthroplasty Using the Self Locking Finger Joint Implant: Minimum Two Years Follow-up.

Issei Komatsu1, Yoshiya Arishima2, Hirotomo Shibahashi1, Toshihito Yamaguchi1, Yoshitaka Minamikawa1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Self Locking Finger Joint (SLFJ) implant is a new type of surface replacement implant. The purpose of this study was to evaluate midterm clinical outcomes of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) arthroplasty with the SLFJ implant.
METHODS: We retrospectively studied 26 PIP joint arthroplasties using the SLFJ implant in 17 patients with osteoarthritis or posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Preoperative and postoperative range of motion, grip strength and key pinch, radiographic findings, and complications were evaluated. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, course of pain, and patient satisfaction were obtained.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 44 months (range, 24-76 months). The average active PIP joint arc of motion improved from 36° before surgery to 44° after surgery. Grip strength and key pinch showed no statistical difference between preoperative and postoperative assessments. The average DASH score and VAS score improved from 40 to 15 and from 5 to 1, respectively. Overall patient satisfaction was 94%. Ninety percent of implants showed osteointegration, and there were no radiographic signs of migration and loosening. Three joints (12%) showed abnormal heterotopic bone formation. Four joints (15%) had secondary surgery-1 joint needing joint head and socket replacement and 3 joints needing contracture release.
CONCLUSIONS: Our minimum 2 years of follow-up evaluation of the SLFJ implant PIP joint arthroplasty demonstrated good pain relief and good overall patient satisfaction while maintaining joint range of motion. The SLFJ implant showed good osteointegration. Further longer-term prospective studies with various types of currently available implants are needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Self Locking Finger Joint implant; osteoarthritis; osteointegration; proximal interphalangeal joint; surface replacement arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28918664      PMCID: PMC6300185          DOI: 10.1177/1558944717726136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hand (N Y)        ISSN: 1558-9447


  21 in total

1.  Gene expression of type II collagens in chondro-osteophytes in experimental osteoarthritis.

Authors:  J R Matyas; L J Sandell; M E Adams
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  Metacarpophalangeal joint implants. I. Roentgenographic study on the silastic finger joint implant, swanson design.

Authors:  C G Hagert; O Eiken; N M Ohlsson; W Aschan; A Movin
Journal:  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1975

3.  Arthrodesis as a salvage for failed proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  David B Jones; Duncan B Ackerman; Douglas M Sammer; Marco Rizzo
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 4.  Osteophytes: relevance and biology.

Authors:  Peter M van der Kraan; Wim B van den Berg
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  Pyrolytic carbon resurfacing arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the finger.

Authors:  Thomas M Sweets; Peter J Stern
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Early results with osseointegrated proximal interphalangeal joint prostheses.

Authors:  K Möller; C Sollerman; M Geijer; P I Brånemark
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.230

7.  Outcomes of proximal interphalangeal joint pyrocarbon implants.

Authors:  Ulrika Wijk; Margareta Wollmark; Philippe Kopylov; Magnus Tägil
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2009-11-22       Impact factor: 2.230

8.  A prospective, randomized comparison of 3 types of proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  W Daecke; B Kaszap; A K Martini; F W Hagena; B Rieck; M Jung
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.230

9.  Cemented versus uncemented surface replacement arthroplasty of the proximal interphalangeal joint with a mean 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Bruce R Johnstone; Megan Fitzgerald; Katherine R Smith; Lachlan J Currie
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.230

10.  Resurfacing arthroplasty versus silicone arthroplasty for proximal interphalangeal joint osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Barton R Branam; Harrison G Tuttle; Peter J Stern; Linda Levin
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.230

View more
  3 in total

1.  Trends in Primary Proximal Interphalangeal Joint System and Revisions for Osteoarthritis of the Hand in the Medicare Database.

Authors:  Michael O Madden; Joseph R Palmer; Bijan J Ameri; Rushabh M Vakharia; Jacob Landes; Martin W Roche
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2019-03-21

2.  Surface Replacement Arthroplasty Using a Volar Approach for Osteoarthritis of Proximal Interphalangeal Joint: Results After a Minimum 5-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Ken Shirakawa; Masahiko Shirota
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2018-07-17

Review 3.  Hand Surgery in Japan.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Minamikawa; Emiko Horii; Yoshitaka Hamada
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2021-03-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.