Literature DB >> 28918654

Stakeholders' Perceptions Sought to Inform the Development of a Low-Cost Mobile Robot for Older Adults: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.

Justine S Sefcik1, Michelle J Johnson1, Mark Yim1, Tessa Lau2, Nicholas Vivio3, Caio Mucchiani1, Pamela Z Cacchione1,4.   

Abstract

Creative solutions are needed to support community-dwelling older adults residing in a variety of settings including their house, apartment, or Supportive Apartment Living (SAL) to promote independence and reduce the risk of nursing home replacement. The objective of this study was to gain an understanding of older adults' needs for physical, mental, and social activities to support the design and functionality of a low-cost mobile assistive robot. A qualitative descriptive study was designed which included three stakeholder focus groups (caregivers, clinicians, and older adults). We held three focus groups with a total of 19 participants: one with paid caregivers ( n = 6), one with interdisciplinary clinicians ( n = 8), and one with older adults residing in SAL ( n = 5). Conventional content analysis was the analytical technique. Four themes emerged: (a) Accomplishing Everyday Tasks: activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) were important from the perspectives of all three groups for the older adults to accomplish daily, as well as the "use it or lose it" attitude of the older adults; (b) Personal Connections and Meaningful Activities: for the older adults, it was important for them to engage in socialization and leisure activities, and for the caregivers and clinicians, they work to build personal relationships with the older adults; (c) Cognitive Interventions: the clinicians provided cognitive tools (including reminders, routine and designing interventions) to older adults so they can remain as safe and independent as possible in the SAL; and (d) Safety Measures: encompassed clinicians addressing safety and injury prevention and the caregivers checking in on the older adults in their SAL apartments. This work contributed to the design and functionality specifications for an autonomous low-cost mobile robot for deployment to increase the independence of older adults.

Entities:  

Keywords:  activities of daily living; older adults; qualitative research; robot design; stakeholders

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28918654      PMCID: PMC5993053          DOI: 10.1177/1054773817730517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nurs Res        ISSN: 1054-7738            Impact factor:   2.075


  14 in total

1.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

2.  Innovative collaborations: a case study for academic owned nursing practice.

Authors:  Eileen M Sullivan-Marx; Christine Bradway; Jane Barnsteiner
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.176

3.  Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh; Sarah E Shannon
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2005-11

4.  The qualitative content analysis process.

Authors:  Satu Elo; Helvi Kyngäs
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.187

5.  Commentary: Writing and Evaluating Qualitative Research Reports.

Authors:  Yelena P Wu; Deborah Thompson; Karen J Aroian; Elizabeth L McQuaid; Janet A Deatrick
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2016-04-26

6.  Co-creation of a pedagogical space to support qualitative inquiry: An advanced qualitative collective.

Authors:  Sarah Abboud; Su Kyung Kim; Sara Jacoby; Kim Mooney-Doyle; Terease Waite; Elizabeth Froh; Justine S Sefcik; Hyejin Kim; Timothy Joseph Sowicz; Terri-Ann Kelly; Sarah Kagan
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.442

Review 7.  Characteristics of Qualitative Descriptive Studies: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hyejin Kim; Justine S Sefcik; Christine Bradway
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 2.228

8.  Advanced technology care innovation for older people in Italy: necessity and opportunity to promote health and wellbeing.

Authors:  Fabrizia Lattanzio; Angela M Abbatecola; Roberta Bevilacqua; Carlos Chiatti; Andrea Corsonello; Lorena Rossi; Silvia Bustacchini; Roberto Bernabei
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 4.669

Review 9.  Assistive technologies for ageing populations in six low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Keshini Madara Marasinghe; Jostacio Moreno Lapitan; Alex Ross
Journal:  BMJ Innov       Date:  2015-09-11

10.  Qualitative description - the poor cousin of health research?

Authors:  Mette Asbjoern Neergaard; Frede Olesen; Rikke Sand Andersen; Jens Sondergaard
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  3 in total

1.  Companion robots for older adults: Rodgers' evolutionary concept analysis approach.

Authors:  Jeongeun Kim; Sukwha Kim; Seongheui Kim; Euehun Lee; Yoonjeong Heo; Cheol-Yong Hwang; Yun-Young Choi; Hyoun-Joong Kong; Hyeongju Ryu; Hyeongsuk Lee
Journal:  Intell Serv Robot       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Effect of the Information Support Robot on the Daily Activity of Older People Living Alone in Actual Living Environment.

Authors:  Jumpei Mizuno; Daisuke Saito; Ken Sadohara; Misato Nihei; Shinichi Ohnaka; Jun Suzurikawa; Takenobu Inoue
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Motion Analysis and Tactile-Based Impedance Control of the Chest Holder of a Piggyback Patient Transfer Robot.

Authors:  Yuxin Liu; Yuting Yin; Zhiwen Jiang; Shijie Guo
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 2.682

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.