Literature DB >> 17197919

Excellent interobserver agreement on grading the extent of residual carcinoma after preoperative chemoradiation in esophageal and esophagogastric junction carcinoma: a reliable predictor for patient outcome.

Tsung-Teh Wu1, Lucian R Chirieac, Susan C Abraham, Alyssa M Krasinskas, Huamin Wang, Asif Rashid, Arlene M Correa, Wayne L Hofstetter, Jaffer A Ajani, Stephen G Swisher.   

Abstract

The extent of residual carcinoma in resected esophageal cancer specimens after preoperative chemoradiation is a predictor of survival according to 3 groups: P0 (0% residual carcinoma), P1 (1% to 50% residual carcinoma), and P2 (>50% residual carcinoma). However, the interobserver variation and reliability of this classification has not been evaluated among different pathologists. Histologic hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides from 60 coded cases of esophageal adenocarcinomas treated with preoperative chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy were independently reviewed by 6 pathologists from 4 different institutions for extent of residual carcinoma and ypT stage. Interobserver agreement was analyzed by kappa (kappa) statistics, and grading of extent of residual carcinoma and ypT stage based on individual and consensus gradings were correlated with patients' survival. The interobserver agreement was excellent for extent of residual carcinoma (kappa=0.84, Kendall's W=0.92; P<0.000001) and was good for ypT stage (kappa=0.71, Kendall's W=0.88; P<0.000001). Agreement was excellent for all categories of residual carcinoma: P0 (kappa=0.87), P1 (kappa=0.81), and P2 (kappa=0.85). Extent of residual carcinoma was a significant predictor for overall survival based on individual pathologist grading (all P values <0.03), and consensus grading (13 P0, 32 P1, and 15 P2), P=0.004; independent of ypT and ypN stages in multivariate analysis (P=0.02). Our results indicate that after preoperative chemoradiation in esophageal cancer there is excellent interobserver agreement among pathologists on grading extent of residual carcinoma. The extent of residual carcinoma is a reliable and reproducible predictor of survival; this grading system may allow a novel and early means of comparing outcomes after different neoadjuvant treatment regimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17197919     DOI: 10.1097/01.pas.0000213312.36306.cc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  40 in total

Review 1.  Pathologic assessment of gastrointestinal tract and pancreatic carcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Reetesh K Pai; Rish K Pai
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Risk stratification for recurrence in patients with esophageal and junctional carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery.

Authors:  S Dixit; M Tilston; W M Peter
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  A phase II randomized trial of induction chemotherapy versus no induction chemotherapy followed by preoperative chemoradiation in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  J A Ajani; L Xiao; J A Roth; W L Hofstetter; G Walsh; R Komaki; Z Liao; D C Rice; A A Vaporciyan; D M Maru; J H Lee; M S Bhutani; A Eid; J C Yao; A P Phan; A Halpin; A Suzuki; T Taketa; P F Thall; S G Swisher
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  8th edition AJCC/UICC staging of cancers of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: application to clinical practice.

Authors:  Thomas W Rice; Deepa T Patil; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-03

Review 5.  Pathology of esophageal cancer and Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Shilpa Jain; Sadhna Dhingra
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-03

6.  BAK is a predictive and prognostic biomarker for the therapeutic effect of docetaxel treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Tomohiro Kubo; Yutaka Kawano; Nobuaki Himuro; Shintaro Sugita; Yasushi Sato; Kazuma Ishikawa; Kohichi Takada; Kazuyuki Murase; Koji Miyanishi; Tsutomu Sato; Rishu Takimoto; Masayoshi Kobune; Takayuki Nobuoka; Koichi Hirata; Tetsuji Takayama; Mitsuru Mori; Tadashi Hasegawa; Junji Kato
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 7.  Tumor regression grading of gastrointestinal cancers after neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Rupert Langer; Karen Becker
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-09-16       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  ALDH-1 expression levels predict response or resistance to preoperative chemoradiation in resectable esophageal cancer patients.

Authors:  J A Ajani; X Wang; S Song; A Suzuki; T Taketa; K Sudo; R Wadhwa; W L Hofstetter; R Komaki; D M Maru; J H Lee; M S Bhutani; B Weston; V Baladandayuthapani; Y Yao; S Honjo; A W Scott; H D Skinner; R L Johnson; D Berry
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 6.603

9.  Distribution of Resistant Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in the Resected Specimens of Clinical Stage III Patients after Chemoradiation: Its Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Nastaran Neishaboori; Roopma Wadhwa; Graciela M Nogueras-González; Elena Elimova; Hironori Shiozaki; Kazuki Sudo; Nikolaos Charalampakis; Adarsh Hiremath; Jeffrey H Lee; Manoop S Bhutani; Brian Weston; Mariela A Blum; Jane E Rogers; Jeana L Garris; David C Rice; Ritsuko Komaki; Stephen G Swisher; Heath D Skinner; Wayne L Hofstetter; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.935

Review 10.  [Pretherapeutic misclassification of esophageal cancer and adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction : Possibilities and clinical consequences].

Authors:  I Gockel; F Lordick; O Lyros; N Kreuser; A H Hölscher; C Wittekind
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.