Literature DB >> 28918483

Effects of multidisciplinary teams and an integrated follow-up electronic system on clinical pharmacist interventions in a cancer hospital.

Muhammad Tahir Aziz1,2, Tofeeq Ur Rehman3, Sadia Qureshi4, Sidrah Andleeb5.   

Abstract

Background The aim of drug therapy is to attain distinct therapeutic effects that not only improve patient's quality of life but also reduce the inherent risks associated with the therapeutic use of drugs. Pharmacists play a key role in reducing these risks by developing appropriate interventions. Whether to accept or reject the intervention made by the pharmacist is a relevant consultant's decision. Objective To evaluate the impact of electronic prompts and follow-up of rejected pharmacy interventions by clinical pharmacists in an in-patient setting. Setting Shaukat Khanum Cancer Hospital & Research Center, Lahore, Pakistan. Method The study was conducted in two phases. Data for 3 months were collected for each phase of the study. Systematic and quantifiable consensus validity was developed for rejected interventions in phase 1, based on patient outcome analyses. Severity rating was assigned to assess the significance of interventions. Electronic prompts for follow-on interventions in phase 2 were then developed and implemented, including daily review via a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach. Main outcome measure Validity of rejected interventions, acceptance of follow-on interventions before and after re-engineering the pharmacy processes, rejection rate and severity rating of follow-on interventions. Result Of a total of 2649 and 3064 interventions that were implemented during phase 1 and phase 2, 238 (9%) and 307 (10%) were rejected, respectively. Additionally, 133 (56%) were inappropriate rejections during phase 1. The estimated reliability between pharmacists regarding rejected interventions was 0.74 (95% CI of 0.69, 0.79, p 0.000). Prospective data were analysed after implementing electronic alerts and an MDT approach. The acceptance rate of follow-on interventions in phase 2 was 60% (184). Conclusion Electronic prompts for follow-on interventions together with an MDT approach enhance the optimization of pharmacotherapy, increase drug rationality and improve patient care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electronic alert; Multidisciplinary team; Pakistan; Pharmacy interventions; Rejected interventions

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28918483     DOI: 10.1007/s11096-017-0530-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm


  47 in total

Review 1.  Clinical pharmacists and inpatient medical care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Peter J Kaboli; Angela B Hoth; Brad J McClimon; Jeffrey L Schnipper
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-05-08

2.  Effects of a clinical pharmacist service on health-related quality of life and prescribing of drugs: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Lina Bladh; Ellinor Ottosson; John Karlsson; Lars Klintberg; Susanna M Wallerstedt
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 7.035

3.  The process of identifying, solving and preventing drug related problems in the LIMM-study.

Authors:  Anna Bergkvist Christensen; Linda Holmbjer; Patrik Midlöv; Peter Höglund; Lisa Larsson; Åsa Bondesson; Tommy Eriksson
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2011-11-12

4.  Prevalence of medication-related problems among patients with renal compromise in an Indian hospital.

Authors:  R L Castelino; B S Sathvik; G Parthasarathi; K C Gurudev; M S Shetty; M G Narahari
Journal:  J Clin Pharm Ther       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Characteristics of drug-related problems discussed by hospital pharmacists in multidisciplinary teams.

Authors:  Hege Salvesen Blix; Kirsten K Viktil; Tron Anders Moger; Asmund Reikvam
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2006-09-27

Review 6.  Fundamentals of medication error research.

Authors:  E L Allan; K N Barker
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1990-03

7.  Detection of prescription errors by a unit-based clinical pharmacist in a nephrology ward.

Authors:  Ghazal Vessal
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2009-10-17

8.  The effect of a clinical pharmacist discharge service on medication discrepancies in patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Rixt Nynke Eggink; Albert W Lenderink; Jos W M G Widdershoven; Patricia M L A van den Bemt
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2010-09-01

9.  Effect of pharmacists on medication errors in an emergency department.

Authors:  Jamie N Brown; Connie L Barnes; Beth Beasley; Robert Cisneros; Melanie Pound; Charles Herring
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 2.637

10.  The impact of clinical pharmacy intervention in a psychiatric hospital.

Authors:  A Dorevitch; E Perl
Journal:  J Clin Pharm Ther       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.512

View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of Medication Instruction Sheets for Patients Undergoing R-CHOP Therapy in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma.

Authors:  Mayako Uchida; Rika Kawai; Rie Hisamitsu; Sayaka Mai; Shigeru Ishida; Hiroyuki Watanabe; Takehiro Kawashiri; Koji Kato; Keiko Hosohata; Toshihiro Miyamoto; Nobuaki Egashira; Tsutomu Nakamura; Koichi Akashi; Ichiro Ieiri
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 2.  A Narrative Review of Clinical Decision Support for Inpatient Clinical Pharmacists.

Authors:  Liang Yan; Thomas Reese; Scott D Nelson
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 2.342

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.