Literature DB >> 2180287

Fundamentals of medication error research.

E L Allan1, K N Barker.   

Abstract

Types of medication errors are defined, error detection techniques are described, and the validity of several medication error studies is evaluated. A medication error is generally defined as a deviation from the physician's medication order as written on the patient's chart. In hospitals, medication errors occur at a rate of about one per patient per day. A dispensing error is one made by pharmacy staff when distributing medications to nursing units or directly to patients in an ambulatory-care pharmacy; the error rates for doses dispensed via the cart-filling process range from 0.87% to 2.9%. Categories of medication errors should be operationally defined before an investigation, and any allowable deviations from the physician's order should be clearly stated. Fourteen error category definitions are presented. Methods for detecting medication errors include anonymous self-reports (questionnaires), incident reports, the critical-incident technique (analyses of a large number of individual errors to identify common causal factors), and direct observation (including the disguised-observation and participant observer techniques). Observation is the best error detection method in terms of accuracy. Results of medication error studies were examined for validity and classified into one of four categories: (A) results should be accepted as reported, (B) results overestimate or underestimate the truth by a known amount, (C) results overestimate the truth by an unknown amount, and (D) results should not be accepted. All studies examined for validity used observation as the error detection technique. The following guidelines for observation-based medication error studies were established: The observer should follow the subject to the patient's bedside, the observer should witness patient consumption of each dose, the observer should not be familiar with patient drug regimens before observation, operational definitions must be used, and having an error validation committee can be advantageous. Future studies are needed that focus on the identification and testing of new error prevention methods that use the techniques described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2180287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm        ISSN: 0002-9289


  94 in total

1.  Accidental iatrogenic intoxications by cytotoxic drugs: error analysis and practical preventive strategies.

Authors:  B Zernikow; E Michel; G Fleischhack; U Bode
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  When should pharmacists visit their wards? An application of simulation to planning hospital pharmacy services.

Authors:  B Dean; A van Ackere; S Gallivan; N Barber
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  1999-01

3.  Analysis and quantification of prescribing and transcription errors in a paediatric oncology service.

Authors:  R Pichon; G L Zelger; P Wacker; A L Vodoz; J Humbert
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2002-02

4.  Parenteral drug administration errors by nursing staff on an acute medical admissions ward during day duty.

Authors:  J Bruce; I Wong
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Frequency and Nature of Medication Errors and Adverse Drug Events in Mental Health Hospitals: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ghadah H Alshehri; Richard N Keers; Darren M Ashcroft
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Observational study of potential risk factors of medication administration errors.

Authors:  Edgar Tissot; Christian Cornette; Samuel Limat; Jean-Louis Mourand; Michële Becker; Joseph-Philippe Etievent; Jean-Louis Dupond; Micheline Jacquet; Marie-Christine Woronoff-Lemsi
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2003-12

7.  The validation of an existing method of scoring the severity of medication administration errors for use in Germany.

Authors:  Katja Taxis; Bryony Dean; Nick Barber
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2002-12

8.  Medication errors in hospitals: computerized unit dose drug dispensing system versus ward stock distribution system.

Authors:  Jean-Eudes Fontan; Vincent Maneglier; Vu Xuan Nguyen; Chantal Loirat; Françoise Brion
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2003-06

9.  A feasibility study for recording of dispensing errors and near misses' in four UK primary care pharmacies.

Authors:  Siew-Siang Chua; Ian C K Wong; Hilary Edmondson; Caroline Allen; Jean Chow; Joanne Peacham; Graham Hill; Jenny Grantham
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.606

10.  Preprinted assessment sheet.

Authors:  K M Srivatsa
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.