Literature DB >> 23115878

Intended and unintended births in the United States: 1982-2010.

William D Mosher1, Jo Jones, Joyce C Abma.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This report shows trends since 1982 in whether a woman wanted to get pregnant just before the pregnancy occurred. This is the most direct measure available of the extent to which women are able (or unable) to choose to have the number of births they want, when they want them. In this report, this is called the "standard measure of unintended pregnancy."
METHODS: The data used in this report are primarily from the 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Center for Health Statistics. The 2006-2010 NSFG included in-person interviews with 12,279 women aged 15-44. Some data in the trend analyses are taken from NSFG surveys conducted in 1982, 1988, 1995, and 2002.
RESULTS: About 37% of births in the United States were unintended at the time of conception. The overall proportion unintended has not declined significantly since 1982. The proportion unintended did decline significantly between 1982 and 2006-2010 among births to married, non-Hispanic white women. Large differences exist between groups in the percentage of births that are unintended. For example, unmarried women, black women, and women with less education or income are still much more likely to experience unintended births compared with married, white, college-educated, and high-income women. This report also describes some alternative measures of unintended births that give researchers an opportunity to study this topic in new ways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23115878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Natl Health Stat Report        ISSN: 2164-8344


  107 in total

1.  Unintended birth among Hispanic women in Texas: a descriptive analysis.

Authors:  Denise Vasquez; Jill A McDonald; Nuria Homedes; Louis D Brown
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-06

2.  Relationship characteristics and feelings about pregnancy among black and puerto rican young adults.

Authors:  Marion Carter; Joan M Kraft; Linda Hock-Long; Kendra Hatfield-Timajchy
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2013-08-09

3.  Pregnancy intention and use of contraception among Hispanic women in the United States: data from the National Survey of Family Growth, 2006-2010.

Authors:  Lisa M Masinter; Joe Feinglass; Melissa A Simon
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Unplanned pregnancy in adolescents: association with family structure, employed mother, and female friends with health-risk habits and behaviors.

Authors:  Francisco Vázquez-Nava; Carlos F Vázquez-Rodriguez; Atenógenes H Saldívar-González; Eliza M Vázquez-Rodríguez; José A Córdova-Fernández; Jorge Felizardo-Ávalos; Wilberto Sánchez-Márquez
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.671

5.  Tobacco and alcohol use in adolescents with unplanned pregnancies: relation with family structure, tobacco and alcohol use at home and by friends.

Authors:  Vazquez-Nava Francisco; Vazquez-Rodríguez Carlos; Vazquez-Rodriguez Eliza; Castillo-Ruiz Octelina; Iribar Ibabe Maria
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.927

6.  Psychological, social, and spiritual effects of contraceptive steroid hormones.

Authors:  Hanna Klaus; Manuel E Cortés
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2015-08

7.  Psychological Aspects of Contraception, Unintended Pregnancy, and Abortion.

Authors:  Julia R Steinberg; Lisa R Rubin
Journal:  Policy Insights Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2014-10

8.  High Educational Aspirations Among Pregnant Adolescents Are Related to Pregnancy Unwantedness and Subsequent Parenting Stress and Inadequacy.

Authors:  Patricia L East; Jennifer S Barber
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2014-06

9.  Gender Equity, Opportunity Costs of Parenthood, and Educational Differences in Unintended First Births: Insights from Japan.

Authors:  James M Raymo; Kelly Musick; Miho Iwasawa
Journal:  Popul Res Policy Rev       Date:  2015-04-01

10.  Family Formation Processes: Assessing the Need for a New Nationally Representative Household Panel Survey in the United States.

Authors:  Wendy D Manning
Journal:  J Econ Soc Meas       Date:  2015
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.