Literature DB >> 28917016

Predictors of outpatient resource utilization following ventral and incisional hernia repair.

Alex Wade1, Margaret A Plymale2, Daniel L Davenport3, Sara E Johnson1, Vashisht V Madabhushi2, Erica Mastoroudis2, Charlie Tancula2, John Scott Roth4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Little is known about the predictors of increased ambulatory costs following open ventral and incisional hernia repair (VIHR); however, postoperative complications would be expected to be associated with an increased burden on outpatient resources. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of perioperative factors on outpatient resource utilization following VIHR.
METHODS: With IRB approval, the surgery scheduling system was queried to identify all cases of VIHR done at our institution over 3 years. Cases with other procedures done at time of VIHR were excluded. National Surgical Quality Improvement Program clinical data, physician billing data which included market and payor across cases, and medical record review data were combined and evaluated in order to quantify care and predictors of usage during the 6 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 308 patients. Median patient age was 52 years (SD = 13.3), and over half were female. The number of outpatient visits to the surgical office varied from 0 to 18 [median = 2; interquartile range (IQR) = 1-3]. CDC Wound Class >1 was associated with increase of mean 1.4 visits (IQR: 0.5-2.3); p = 0.003. Component separation, longer duration of operation, and increased mesh size were also predictive of increased number of office visits (p < 0.01). Postoperative infected seroma/seroma requiring drainage added a mean 2.3 visits (IQR: 1.3-3.3), (p < 0.001); and deep wound infection added a mean 3.9 visits (IQR: 1.9-5.9) (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative complications confer a significant burden for patients and to the outpatient surgical office. In an era in which improved quality and cost-efficiency has become imperative, measures to decrease risk of postoperative complications particularly for more complex VIHR would be expected to decrease resource utilization and increase value of care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambulatory costs; Hospital costs; Outpatient resource utilization; Postoperative complications; Surgical site infection; Ventral hernia repair

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28917016     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5849-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  15 in total

1.  Readmission following open ventral hernia repair: incidence, indications, and predictors.

Authors:  Mylan T Nguyen; Linda T Li; Stephanie C Hicks; Jessica A Davila; James W Suliburk; Mimi Leong; Lillian S Kao; David H Berger; Mike K Liang
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Ventral and incisional hernia: the cost of comorbidities and complications.

Authors:  Margaret A Plymale; Ranjan Ragulojan; Daniel L Davenport; J Scott Roth
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Preoperative risk prediction of surgical site infection requiring hospitalization or reoperation in patients undergoing vascular surgery.

Authors:  Surbhi Leekha; Brian D Lahr; Rodney L Thompson; Priya Sampathkumar; Audra A Duncan; Robert Orenstein
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System (SURPAS): I. Parsimonious, Clinically Meaningful Groups of Postoperative Complications by Factor Analysis.

Authors:  Robert A Meguid; Michael R Bronsert; Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga; Karl E Hammermeister; William G Henderson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Telephone call contact for post-discharge surveillance of surgical site infections. A pilot, methodological study.

Authors:  E W Taylor; K Duffy; K Lee; A Noone; A Leanord; P M King; P O'Dwyer
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Cost of ventral hernia repair using biologic or synthetic mesh.

Authors:  Crystal F Totten; Daniel L Davenport; Nicholas D Ward; J Scott Roth
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  Benefits of Multimodal Enhanced Recovery Pathway in Patients Undergoing Open Ventral Hernia Repair.

Authors:  Arnab Majumder; Mojtaba Fayezizadeh; Ruel Neupane; Heidi L Elliott; Yuri W Novitsky
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Health and economic impact of surgical site infections diagnosed after hospital discharge.

Authors:  Eli N Perencevich; Kenneth E Sands; Sara E Cosgrove; Edward Guadagnoli; Ellen Meara; Richard Platt
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Patient perspectives on post-discharge surgical site infections: towards a patient-centered mobile health solution.

Authors:  Patrick C Sanger; Andrea Hartzler; Sarah M Han; Cheryl A L Armstrong; Mark R Stewart; Ross J Lordon; William B Lober; Heather L Evans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Complex ventral hernia repair with a human acellular dermal matrix.

Authors:  J S Roth; C Brathwaite; K Hacker; K Fisher; J King
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 4.739

View more
  2 in total

1.  Serum C-reactive protein level after ventral hernia repair with mesh reinforcement can predict infectious complications: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  J Pochhammer; B Scholtes; J Keuler; B Müssle; T Welsch; M Schäffer
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Emergent and urgent ventral hernia repair: comparing recurrence rates amongst procedures utilizing mesh versus no mesh.

Authors:  Rachel Whittaker; Zachary Lewis; Margaret A Plymale; Michael Nisiewicz; Ajadi Ebunoluwa; Daniel L Davenport; Jessica K Reynolds; John Scott Roth
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.453

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.