Lori F Gentile1, George Plitas1, Emily C Zabor2, Michelle Stempel1, Monica Morrow1, Andrea V Barrio3. 1. Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 3. Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. barrioa@mskcc.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is used to convert patients with inoperable locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) to operability, but has not traditionally been used to avoid mastectomy or axillary dissection in this subset. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) in LABC patients, and identify factors predictive of pCR to determine if responding patients might be suitable for limited surgery. METHODS: From 2006 to 2016, 1522 patients received NAC followed by surgery; 321 had advanced disease in the breast (cT4) and/or in the nodes (cN2/N3). pCR rates were assessed by T and N stage, and receptor subtype. RESULTS: Of 321 LABC patients, 223 were cT4, 77 were cN2, and 82 were cN3. Forty-three percent were hormone receptor (HR) positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative (HR+/HER2-), 23% were triple negative, and 34% were HER2+. The overall pCR rate was 25% and differed by receptor subtype (HR+/HER2- 7%, triple negative 23%, HER2+ 48%; p < 0.001). Breast pCR occurred in 27% of patients and was similar in T4 versus non-T4 disease (29% vs. 22%; p = 0.26). Nodal pCR was achieved in 38% of cN+ patients and did not differ by nodal stage (cN1 43%, cN2 36%, cN3 32%; p = 0.23). Nodal pCR was significantly more common than breast pCR (p = 0.014) across all tumor subtypes. Receptor subtype was the only predictor of overall pCR (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with LABC, pCR after NAC was seen in 25%, and did not differ by T or N stage. Tumor biology, but not extent of disease, predicted pCR. Studies assessing the feasibility of surgical downstaging with NAC in LABC patients are warranted.
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is used to convert patients with inoperable locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) to operability, but has not traditionally been used to avoid mastectomy or axillary dissection in this subset. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) in LABC patients, and identify factors predictive of pCR to determine if responding patients might be suitable for limited surgery. METHODS: From 2006 to 2016, 1522 patients received NAC followed by surgery; 321 had advanced disease in the breast (cT4) and/or in the nodes (cN2/N3). pCR rates were assessed by T and N stage, and receptor subtype. RESULTS: Of 321 LABC patients, 223 were cT4, 77 were cN2, and 82 were cN3. Forty-three percent were hormone receptor (HR) positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative (HR+/HER2-), 23% were triple negative, and 34% were HER2+. The overall pCR rate was 25% and differed by receptor subtype (HR+/HER2- 7%, triple negative 23%, HER2+ 48%; p < 0.001). Breast pCR occurred in 27% of patients and was similar in T4 versus non-T4 disease (29% vs. 22%; p = 0.26). Nodal pCR was achieved in 38% of cN+ patients and did not differ by nodal stage (cN1 43%, cN2 36%, cN3 32%; p = 0.23). Nodal pCR was significantly more common than breast pCR (p = 0.014) across all tumor subtypes. Receptor subtype was the only predictor of overall pCR (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with LABC, pCR after NAC was seen in 25%, and did not differ by T or N stage. Tumor biology, but not extent of disease, predicted pCR. Studies assessing the feasibility of surgical downstaging with NAC in LABC patients are warranted.
Authors: Kenneth C Anderson; Melissa Alsina; William Bensinger; J Sybil Biermann; Asher Chanan-Khan; Adam D Cohen; Steven Devine; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Cristina Gasparetto; Carol Ann Huff; Madan Jagasia; Bruno C Medeiros; Ruby Meredith; Noopur Raje; Jeffrey Schriber; Seema Singhal; George Somlo; Keith Stockerl-Goldstein; Guido Tricot; Julie M Vose; Donna Weber; Joachim Yahalom; Furhan Yunus Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Patricia Cortazar; Lijun Zhang; Michael Untch; Keyur Mehta; Joseph P Costantino; Norman Wolmark; Hervé Bonnefoi; David Cameron; Luca Gianni; Pinuccia Valagussa; Sandra M Swain; Tatiana Prowell; Sibylle Loibl; D Lawrence Wickerham; Jan Bogaerts; Jose Baselga; Charles Perou; Gideon Blumenthal; Jens Blohmer; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Jonas Bergh; Vladimir Semiglazov; Robert Justice; Holger Eidtmann; Soonmyung Paik; Martine Piccart; Rajeshwari Sridhara; Peter A Fasching; Leen Slaets; Shenghui Tang; Bernd Gerber; Charles E Geyer; Richard Pazdur; Nina Ditsch; Priya Rastogi; Wolfgang Eiermann; Gunter von Minckwitz Journal: Lancet Date: 2014-02-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Brittany L Murphy; Tanya L Hoskin; Judy C Boughey; Amy C Degnim; Jodi M Carter; Katrina N Glazebrook; Tina J Hieken Journal: Surgery Date: 2016-08-09 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Harry D Bear; Stewart Anderson; Ann Brown; Roy Smith; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Bernard Fisher; Richard Margolese; Heather Theoret; Atilla Soran; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-10-14 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jeannie Shen; Vicente Valero; Thomas A Buchholz; S Eva Singletary; Frederick C Ames; Merrick I Ross; Massimo Cristofanilli; Gildy V Babiera; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Barry Feig; Kelly K Hunt; Henry M Kuerer Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2004-08-16 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: A Schneeweiss; S Chia; T Hickish; V Harvey; A Eniu; R Hegg; C Tausch; J H Seo; Y-F Tsai; J Ratnayake; V McNally; G Ross; J Cortés Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2013-05-22 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Judy C Boughey; Vera J Suman; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Gretchen M Ahrendt; Lee G Wilke; Bret Taback; A Marilyn Leitch; Henry M Kuerer; Monet Bowling; Teresa S Flippo-Morton; David R Byrd; David W Ollila; Thomas B Julian; Sarah A McLaughlin; Linda McCall; W Fraser Symmans; Huong T Le-Petross; Bruce G Haffty; Thomas A Buchholz; Heidi Nelson; Kelly K Hunt Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-10-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Judy C Boughey; Linda M McCall; Karla V Ballman; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Gretchen M Ahrendt; Lee G Wilke; Bret Taback; A Marilyn Leitch; Teresa Flippo-Morton; Kelly K Hunt Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Christopher Gromisch; Motaz Qadan; Mariana Albuquerque Machado; Kebin Liu; Yolonda Colson; Mark W Grinstaff Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2020-03-27 Impact factor: 12.701