Literature DB >> 14559892

The effect on tumor response of adding sequential preoperative docetaxel to preoperative doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide: preliminary results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27.

Harry D Bear1, Stewart Anderson, Ann Brown, Roy Smith, Eleftherios P Mamounas, Bernard Fisher, Richard Margolese, Heather Theoret, Atilla Soran, D Lawrence Wickerham, Norman Wolmark.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27 was designed to determine the effect of adding docetaxel after four cycles of preoperative doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) on clinical and pathological response rates and on disease-free and overall survival of women with operable breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women (N = 2,411) with operable primary breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive either four cycles of preoperative AC followed by surgery (group I), or four cycles of AC followed by four cycles of docetaxel, followed by surgery (group II), or four cycles of AC followed by surgery and then four cycles of docetaxel (group III). Clinical and pathologic tumor responses to preoperative therapy were assessed.
RESULTS: Mean tumor size (4.5 cm) and other key characteristics were evenly balanced among the three treatment arms. Grade 4 toxicity was observed in 10.3% of 2,400 patients during AC treatment, and in 23.4% of 1584 patients during docetaxel treatment. Compared to preoperative AC alone, preoperative AC followed by docetaxel increased the clinical complete response rate (40.1% v 63.6%; P <.001), the overall clinical response rate (85.5% v 90.7%; P <.001), the pathologic complete response rate (13.7% v 26.1%; P <.001), and the proportion of patients with negative nodes (50.8% v 58.2%; P <.001). Pathologic primary breast tumor response was a significant predictor of pathologic nodal status (P <.001).
CONCLUSION: The addition of four cycles of preoperative docetaxel after four cycles of preoperative AC significantly increased clinical and pathologic response rates for operable breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14559892     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  270 in total

1.  Investigation of 18F-FDG PET in the selection of patients with breast cancer as candidates for sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Laura Gilardi; Concetta De Cicco; Marco Colleoni; Anna Cardillo; Emilia Montagna; Silvia Dellapasqua; Viviana Galimberti; Vincenzo Bagnardi; Giovanni Paganelli
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Early breast cancer.

Authors:  Tomoyoshi Suzuki; Masakazu Toi; Shigehira Saji; Kazumi Horiguchi; Tomoyuki Aruga; Eiji Suzuki; Shinichiro Horiguchi; Nobuaki Funata; Katsuyuki Karasawa; Noriko Kamata
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Treatment of locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Sunil Verma; Mark Clemons; Barbara Fitzgerald; Orit Freedman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-08-03       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Letter to the editor regarding "A prospective, controlled study of the botanical compound mixture LCS101 for chemotherapy-induced hematological complications in breast cancer" by Yaal-Hahoshen et al. (The Oncologist 2011;16:1197-1202).

Authors:  Kim D Mooiman; Andrew K L Goey; Irma Meijerman; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-04-17

Review 5.  The need for axillary dissection in patients with positive axillary sentinel lymph nodes.

Authors:  Randal L Croshaw; Kathleen M Erb; Hilary M Shapiro-Wright; Thomas B Julian
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  Quantitative DCE-MRI for prediction of pathological complete response following neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced breast cancer: the impact of breast cancer subtypes on the diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Stylianos Drisis; Thierry Metens; Michael Ignatiadis; Konstantinos Stathopoulos; Shih-Li Chao; Marc Lemort
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Sentinel lymph node metastasis after neoadjuvant treatment in breast cancer: Any size matters?

Authors:  Isabel T Rubio
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-10

Review 8.  Postmastectomy radiation therapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: review and interpretation of available data.

Authors:  Amar U Kishan; Susan A McCloskey
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 8.168

9.  Predictors of locoregional recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results from combined analysis of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18 and B-27.

Authors:  Eleftherios P Mamounas; Stewart J Anderson; James J Dignam; Harry D Bear; Thomas B Julian; Charles E Geyer; Alphonse Taghian; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Neoadjuvant endocrine treatment for breast cancer: from bedside to bench and back again?

Authors:  R R Saleh; N Bouganim; J Hilton; A Arnaout; M Clemons
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.