Literature DB >> 21704998

Bone graft substitutes for articular support and metaphyseal comminution: what are the options?

C Mauffrey1, D Seligson, P Lichte, H C Pape, M Al-Rayyan.   

Abstract

Subchondral and metaphyseal bone defects pose a great challenge for the Orthopaedic surgeon not only because the support for the articular surface has been lost but also because the mechanism for the nourishment of articular cartilage through the subchondral plate is distorted. A number of options are available to the surgeons, none of them perfect. Autografting has an appreciable high rate of harvest site morbidity, allograft is associated with infection transmission and host immunologic response. These realities have stimulated interest in supplying bone replacement materials (demineralised bone matrix, synthetic bone substitutes, bone morphogenic proteins). This paper presents the indications and applications of bone substitutes for metaphyseal defects and subchondral support in orthopaedic trauma.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21704998     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  6 in total

1.  Different post-processing conditions for 3D bioprinted α-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds.

Authors:  Liciane Sabadin Bertol; Rodrigo Schabbach; Luis Alberto Loureiro Dos Santos
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Suitability of the use of an elastin matrix combined with bone morphogenetic protein for the repair of cranial defects.

Authors:  Renato de Moraes; Ana Maria de Guzzi Plepis; Virginia da Conceição Amaro Martins; Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte; Murilo Priori Alcalde; Rogerio Leone Buchaim; Karina Torres Pomini; Eduardo Gomes Machado; Marcelo de Azevedo E Sousa Munhoz; Fernando Bento Cunha; Amanda Regina Alves Calegari; Amilton Iatecola; Samantha Ketelyn Silva; Marcelo Rodrigues da Cunha
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  Bone substitutes and implantation depths for subchondral bone repair in osteochondral defects of porcine knee joints.

Authors:  Tomohiko Matsuo; Keisuke Kita; Tatsuo Mae; Yasukazu Yonetani; Satoshi Miyamoto; Hideki Yoshikawa; Ken Nakata
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  A radiographic and clinical comparison of reamer-irrigator-aspirator versus iliac crest bone graft in ankle arthrodesis.

Authors:  Scott R Nodzo; Nathan B Kaplan; Donald W Hohman; Christopher A Ritter
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  Bioactive Glasses: From Parent 45S5 Composition to Scaffold-Assisted Tissue-Healing Therapies.

Authors:  Elisa Fiume; Jacopo Barberi; Enrica Verné; Francesco Baino
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2018-03-16

Review 6.  Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: A review.

Authors:  Wenhao Wang; Kelvin W K Yeung
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2017-06-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.