Literature DB >> 28916879

A score combining baseline neutrophilia and primary tumor SUVpeak measured from FDG PET is associated with outcome in locally advanced cervical cancer.

Antoine Schernberg1,2, Sylvain Reuze1,2,3,4, Fanny Orlhac2,5, Irène Buvat5, Laurent Dercle6,7, Roger Sun1,2, Elaine Limkin2,3, Alexandre Escande1, Christine Haie-Meder1, Eric Deutsch1,2,3, Cyrus Chargari1,2, Charlotte Robert8,9,10,11.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We investigated whether a score combining baseline neutrophilia and a PET biomarker could predict outcome in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC).
METHODS: Patients homogeneously treated with definitive chemoradiation plus image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) between 2006 and 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. We divided patients into two groups depending on the PET device used: a training set (TS) and a validation set (VS). Primary tumors were semi-automatically delineated on PET images, and 11 radiomics features were calculated (LIFEx software). A PET radiomic index was selected using the time-dependent area under the curve (td-AUC) for 3-year local control (LC). We defined the neutrophil SUV grade (NSG = 0, 1 or 2) score as the number of risk factors among (i) neutrophilia (neutrophil count >7 G/L) and (ii) high risk defined from the PET radiomic index. The NSG prognostic value was evaluated for LC and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: Data from 108 patients were analyzed. Estimated 3-year LC was 72% in the TS (n = 69) and 65% in the VS (n = 39). In the TS, SUVpeak was selected as the most LC-predictive biomarker (td-AUC = 0.75), and was independent from neutrophilia (p = 0.119). Neutrophilia (HR = 2.6), high-risk SUVpeak (SUVpeak > 10, HR = 4.4) and NSG = 2 (HR = 9.2) were associated with low probability of LC in TS. In multivariate analysis, NSG = 2 was independently associated with low probability of LC (HR = 7.5, p < 0.001) and OS (HR = 5.8, p = 0.001) in the TS. Results obtained in the VS (HR = 5.2 for OS and 3.5 for LC, p < 0.02) were promising.
CONCLUSION: This innovative scoring approach combining baseline neutrophilia and a PET biomarker provides an independent prognostic factor to consider for further clinical investigations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarkers; Brachytherapy; Cervical carcinoma; Neutrophilia; Prognostic factor; Radiomics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28916879     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3824-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  38 in total

1.  Pretreatment leukocytosis is an indicator of poor prognosis in patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Seiji Mabuchi; Yuri Matsumoto; Fumiaki Isohashi; Yasuo Yoshioka; Hiroshi Ohashi; Eiichi Morii; Toshimitsu Hamasaki; Katsuyuki Aozasa; David G Mutch; Tadashi Kimura
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Impact of Image Reconstruction Settings on Texture Features in 18F-FDG PET.

Authors:  Jianhua Yan; Jason Lim Chu-Shern; Hoi Yin Loi; Lih Kin Khor; Arvind K Sinha; Swee Tian Quek; Ivan W K Tham; David Townsend
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 3.  Tumor-associated neutrophils: new targets for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Alyssa D Gregory; A McGarry Houghton
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 4.  Regulation of cancer cell metabolism.

Authors:  Rob A Cairns; Isaac S Harris; Tak W Mak
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  Staging of cervical cancer based on tumor heterogeneity characterized by texture features on (18)F-FDG PET images.

Authors:  Wei Mu; Zhe Chen; Ying Liang; Wei Shen; Feng Yang; Ruwei Dai; Ning Wu; Jie Tian
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Tumor-related leukocytosis is associated with poor radiation response and clinical outcome in uterine cervical cancer patients.

Authors:  Y Cho; K H Kim; H I Yoon; G E Kim; Y B Kim
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Distant metastasis in patients with cervical cancer after primary radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy and image guided adaptive brachytherapy.

Authors:  M P Schmid; M Franckena; K Kirchheiner; A Sturdza; P Georg; W Dörr; R Pötter
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 8.  Functional imaging to predict tumor response in locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Tara D Barwick; Alexandra Taylor; Andrea Rockall
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  Revisiting the Robustness of PET-Based Textural Features in the Context of Multi-Centric Trials.

Authors:  Clément Bailly; Caroline Bodet-Milin; Solène Couespel; Hatem Necib; Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré; Catherine Ansquer; Thomas Carlier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data.

Authors:  Robert J Gillies; Paul E Kinahan; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  10 in total

1.  Evaluating Focal 18F-FDG Uptake in Thyroid Gland with Radiomics.

Authors:  Ayşegül Aksu; Nazlı Pınar Karahan Şen; Emine Acar; Gamze Çapa Kaya
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-07-28

2.  A Novel Score Combining Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Parameters and Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index Improves Prognosis Prediction in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Brain Metastases After Stereotactic Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Dong Guo; Jiafeng Liu; Yanping Li; Qingqing Chen; Yunzheng Zhao; Xinwei Guo; Shuchai Zhu; Shengjun Ji
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Improved Prognosis of Treatment Failure in Cervical Cancer with Nontumor PET/CT Radiomics.

Authors:  Tahir I Yusufaly; Jingjing Zou; Tyler J Nelson; Casey W Williamson; Aaron Simon; Meenakshi Singhal; Hannah Liu; Hank Wong; Cheryl C Saenz; Jyoti Mayadev; Michael T McHale; Catheryn M Yashar; Ramez Eskander; Andrew Sharabi; Carl K Hoh; Sebastian Obrzut; Loren K Mell
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 11.082

4.  Integrative nomogram of CT imaging, clinical, and hematological features for survival prediction of patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Linlin Wang; Taotao Dong; Bowen Xin; Chongrui Xu; Meiying Guo; Huaqi Zhang; Dagan Feng; Xiuying Wang; Jinming Yu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Standardized Uptake Value for 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Is a Marker of Inflammatory State and Immune Infiltrate in Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  John M Floberg; Jin Zhang; Naoshad Muhammad; Todd A DeWees; Matthew Inkman; Kevin Chen; Alexander J Lin; Ramachandran Rashmi; Kay Jayachandran; Brian T Edelson; Barry A Siegel; Farrokh Dehdashti; Perry W Grigsby; Stephanie Markovina; Julie K Schwarz
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Analysis of Systemic Inflammatory Factors and Survival Outcomes in Endometrial Cancer Patients Staged I-III FIGO and Treated with Postoperative External Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Katarzyna Holub; Fabio Busato; Sebastien Gouy; Roger Sun; Patricia Pautier; Catherine Genestie; Philippe Morice; Alexandra Leary; Eric Deutsch; Christine Haie-Meder; Albert Biete; Cyrus Chargari
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Prediction of outcome in anal squamous cell carcinoma using radiomic feature analysis of pre-treatment FDG PET-CT.

Authors:  P J Brown; J Zhong; R Frood; S Currie; A Gilbert; A L Appelt; D Sebag-Montefiore; A Scarsbrook
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Towards clinical application of image mining: a systematic review on artificial intelligence and radiomics.

Authors:  Martina Sollini; Lidija Antunovic; Arturo Chiti; Margarita Kirienko
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Radiomic Score as a Potential Imaging Biomarker for Predicting Survival in Patients With Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Handong Li; Miaochen Zhu; Lian Jian; Feng Bi; Xiaoye Zhang; Chao Fang; Ying Wang; Jing Wang; Nayiyuan Wu; Xiaoping Yu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Markers of Prognosis for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Patients (Stage IB1, IB2) Undergoing Surgical Treatment.

Authors:  Chen Xu; Tie Ma; Hongzan Sun; Xiaohan Li; Song Gao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 6.244

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.