Literature DB >> 28916549

Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography in Newly Diagnosed Patients with Giant Cell Arteritis Who Are Taking Glucocorticoids.

Alison H Clifford1,2, Elana M Murphy3,4, Steven C Burrell3,4, Mathew P Bligh3,4, Ryan F MacDougall3,4, J Godfrey Heathcote3,4, Mathieu C Castonguay3,4, Min S Lee3,4, Kara Matheson3,4, John G Hanly3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Large vessel uptake on positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) supports the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA). Its value, however, in patients without arteritis on temporal artery biopsy and in those receiving glucocorticoids remains unknown. We compared PET/CT results in GCA patients with positive (TAB+) and negative temporal artery biopsies (TAB-), and controls.
METHODS: Patients with new clinically diagnosed GCA starting treatment with glucocorticoids underwent temporal artery biopsy and PET/CT. Using a visual semiquantitative approach, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake was scored in 8 vascular territories and summed overall to give a total score in patients and matched controls.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients with GCA and 28 controls were enrolled. Eighteen patients with GCA were TAB+. Mean PET/CT scores after an average of 11.9 days of prednisone were higher in patients with GCA compared to controls, for both total uptake (10.34 ± 2.72 vs 7.73 ± 2.56; p = 0.001), and in 6 of 8 specific vascular territories. PET/CT scores were similar between TAB+ and TAB- patients with GCA. The optimal cutoff for distinguishing GCA cases from controls was a total PET/CT score of ≥ 9, with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.75, sensitivity 71.4%, and specificity 64.3%. Among patients with GCA, these measures correlated with greater total PET/CT scores: systemic symptoms (p = 0.015), lower hemoglobin (p = 0.009), and higher platelet count (p = 0.008).
CONCLUSION: Vascular FDG uptake scores were increased in most patients with GCA despite exposure to prednisone; however, the sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT in this setting were lower than those previously reported.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; GIANT CELL ARTERITIS; RADIONUCLIDE IMAGING; VASCULITIS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28916549     DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.170138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  7 in total

1.  Three days of high-dose glucocorticoid treatment attenuates large-vessel 18F-FDG uptake in large-vessel giant cell arteritis but with a limited impact on diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Berit Dalsgaard Nielsen; Lars Christian Gormsen; Ib Tønder Hansen; Kresten Krarup Keller; Philip Therkildsen; Ellen-Margrethe Hauge
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Risk of ischaemic events at giant cell arteritis diagnosis according to PET/CT findings.

Authors:  Jaume Mestre-Torres; Marc Simó-Perdigó; Fernando Martínez-Valle; Ignacio Navales; Jose Loureiro-Amigo; Roser Solans-Laque
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-05-12       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Monitoring and long-term management of giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica.

Authors:  Dario Camellino; Eric L Matteson; Frank Buttgereit; Christian Dejaco
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 20.543

4.  The Clinical Impact of Using 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the Diagnosis of Suspected Vasculitis: The Effect of Dose and Timing of Glucocorticoid Treatment.

Authors:  Kirsi Taimen; Soile P Salomäki; Ulla Hohenthal; Markku Mali; Sami Kajander; Marko Seppänen; Pirjo Nuutila; Antti Palomäki; Anne Roivainen; Laura Pirilä; Jukka Kemppainen
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  The utility of PET/CT in large vessel vasculitis.

Authors:  Jennifer Ben Shimol; Howard Amital; Merav Lidar; Liran Domachevsky; Yehuda Shoenfeld; Tima Davidson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  EANM procedure guidelines for brain PET imaging using [18F]FDG, version 3.

Authors:  Eric Guedj; Andrea Varrone; Ronald Boellaard; Nathalie L Albert; Henryk Barthel; Bart van Berckel; Matthias Brendel; Diego Cecchin; Ozgul Ekmekcioglu; Valentina Garibotto; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Ian Law; Iván Peñuelas; Franck Semah; Tatjana Traub-Weidinger; Elsmarieke van de Giessen; Donatienne Van Weehaeghe; Silvia Morbelli
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 7.  Semi-Quantitative and Quantitative [18F]FDG-PET/CT Indices for Diagnosing Large Vessel Vasculitis: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Olivier Gheysens; François Jamar; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Halil Yildiz; Kornelis S M van der Geest
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.