Berit Dalsgaard Nielsen1,2, Lars Christian Gormsen3, Ib Tønder Hansen4,5, Kresten Krarup Keller4, Philip Therkildsen4,5, Ellen-Margrethe Hauge4,5. 1. Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogade 44, bygning 3, 8000, Århus C, Denmark. beritnel@rm.dk. 2. Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. beritnel@rm.dk. 3. Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. 4. Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogade 44, bygning 3, 8000, Århus C, Denmark. 5. Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the in-treatment diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET/CT in large-vessel giant cell arteritis (LV-GCA) by serial scans before and after a short course of high-dose glucocorticoid treatment. METHODS: Twenty-four glucocorticoid-naïve patients with new-onset PET/CT verified LV-GCA (pre-treatment baseline PET) were prospectively included. Excluded were patients with a previous history of GCA or polymyalgia rheumatica, LV-GCA-mimicking conditions and patients on immunosuppressive therapy. All patients were treated with 60 mg of oral prednisolone daily and assigned for in-treatment FDG PET/CT after either 3 (PET3) or 10 days (PET10). Two experienced nuclear medicine physicians, blinded to patients' clinical data, reviewed the FDG PET/CT images. A visual semi-quantitative approach was used. Segmental and homogenous FDG uptake in the wall of the aorta and/or supra-aortic branches with higher uptake intensity than liver was considered consistent with vasculitis. Inter-reader reliability was evaluated. RESULTS: Although glucocorticoid treatment attenuated FDG uptake in large vessels, LV-GCA was accurately diagnosed in 10/10 patients after 3 days of treatment, but only in 5/14 patients after 10 days of treatment (p < 0.001). Interrater reliability was substantial (agreement 87%, Cohen's weighted kappa 0.70). No correlation between CRP and FDG uptake was found. CONCLUSIONS: Within 3 days of high-dose glucocorticoid treatment, FDG PET/CT can diagnose LV-GCA with high sensitivity. This window of opportunity ensures that prompt glucocorticoid treatment can be initiated to avoid debilitating GCA complications with a limited effect on diagnostic accuracy. After 10 days of treatment, FDG PET/CT sensitivity decreases significantly.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the in-treatment diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET/CT in large-vessel giant cell arteritis (LV-GCA) by serial scans before and after a short course of high-dose glucocorticoid treatment. METHODS: Twenty-four glucocorticoid-naïve patients with new-onset PET/CT verified LV-GCA (pre-treatment baseline PET) were prospectively included. Excluded were patients with a previous history of GCA or polymyalgia rheumatica, LV-GCA-mimicking conditions and patients on immunosuppressive therapy. All patients were treated with 60 mg of oral prednisolone daily and assigned for in-treatment FDG PET/CT after either 3 (PET3) or 10 days (PET10). Two experienced nuclear medicine physicians, blinded to patients' clinical data, reviewed the FDG PET/CT images. A visual semi-quantitative approach was used. Segmental and homogenous FDG uptake in the wall of the aorta and/or supra-aortic branches with higher uptake intensity than liver was considered consistent with vasculitis. Inter-reader reliability was evaluated. RESULTS: Although glucocorticoid treatment attenuated FDG uptake in large vessels, LV-GCA was accurately diagnosed in 10/10 patients after 3 days of treatment, but only in 5/14 patients after 10 days of treatment (p < 0.001). Interrater reliability was substantial (agreement 87%, Cohen's weighted kappa 0.70). No correlation between CRP and FDG uptake was found. CONCLUSIONS: Within 3 days of high-dose glucocorticoid treatment, FDG PET/CT can diagnose LV-GCA with high sensitivity. This window of opportunity ensures that prompt glucocorticoid treatment can be initiated to avoid debilitating GCA complications with a limited effect on diagnostic accuracy. After 10 days of treatment, FDG PET/CT sensitivity decreases significantly.
Authors: Martin Fuchs; Matthias Briel; Thomas Daikeler; Ulrich A Walker; Helmut Rasch; Scott Berg; Quinn K T Ng; Heike Raatz; David Jayne; Ina Kötter; Daniel Blockmans; Maria C Cid; Sergio Prieto-González; Peter Lamprecht; Carlo Salvarani; Zaharenia Karageorgaki; Richard Watts; Raashid Luqmani; Jan Müller-Brand; Alan Tyndall; Martin A Walter Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-11-10 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Bhaskar Dasgupta; Frances A Borg; Nada Hassan; Leslie Alexander; Kevin Barraclough; Brian Bourke; Joan Fulcher; Jane Hollywood; Andrew Hutchings; Pat James; Valerie Kyle; Jennifer Nott; Michael Power; Ash Samanta Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2010-04-05 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: Carol A Langford; David Cuthbertson; Steven R Ytterberg; Nader Khalidi; Paul A Monach; Simon Carette; Philip Seo; Larry W Moreland; Michael Weisman; Curry L Koening; Antoine G Sreih; Robert Spiera; Carol A McAlear; Kenneth J Warrington; Christian Pagnoux; Kathleen McKinnon; Lindsy J Forbess; Gary S Hoffman; Renée Borchin; Jeffrey P Krischer; Peter A Merkel Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2017-03-03 Impact factor: 10.995
Authors: Martin A Walter; Ralph A Melzer; Christian Schindler; Jan Müller-Brand; Alan Tyndall; Egbert U Nitzsche Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2005-03-04 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Idil Esen; William F Jiemy; Yannick van Sleen; Johan Bijzet; Daniel M de Jong; Pieter H Nienhuis; Riemer H J A Slart; Peter Heeringa; Annemieke M H Boots; Elisabeth Brouwer Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2022-07-06 Impact factor: 7.046