| Literature DB >> 28915790 |
Yanyan Zhang1,2, Xiaoyu Zhu1, Xiangzhen Li1, Yong Tao3,4, Jia Jia1, Xiaohong He1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Famous Chinese strong-flavored liquor (CSFL) is brewed by microbial consortia in a special fermentation pit (FT). However, the fermentation process was not fully understood owing to the complicate community structure and metabolism. In this study, the process-related dynamics of microbial communities and main flavor compounds during the 70-day fermentation process were investigated in a simulated fermentation system.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese strong-flavored liquor; Dynamics; Flavoring chemicals; Microbial community
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28915790 PMCID: PMC5603089 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-017-1106-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Chemical and physical properties of samples at different fermentation stages
| Sample time (day) | 1 | 10 | 23 | 34 | 48 | 59 | 70 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 3.39 ± 0.01a | 3.40 ± 0.01a | 3.42 ± 0.03a | 3.35 ± 0.04ab | 3.25 ± 0.02bc | 3.21 ± 0.04c | 3.24 ± 0.01c |
| Moisture (%) | 56.78 ± 0.00a | 56.02 ± 0.00a | 57.25 ± 0.00a | 57.67 ± 0.01a | 58.58 ± 0.01bc | 58.57 ± 0.00bc | 60.23 ± 0.02c |
| Glucose (mg/g) | 7.27 ± 1.14a | 19.68 ± 6.60b | 28.43 ± 0.81c | 17.17 ± 2.57b | 6.73 ± 1.15a | 4.58 ± 0.36a | 5.62 ± 1.13a |
| Lactic acid (mg/g) | 22.23 ± 0.76a | 20.59 ± 1.31a | 21.84 ± 1.27a | 27.15 ± 1.41b | 29.39 ± 1.12b | 34.75 ± 0.22c | 36.87 ± 1.13c |
| Acetic acid (mg/g) | 1.27 ± 0.03a | 1.20 ± 0.08a | 1.36 ± 0.11a | 1.68 ± 0.15b | 2.16 ± 0.06c | 2.61 ± 0.05d | 2.73 ± 0.32d |
| Propanic acid (mg/g) | 3.68 ± 0.06a | 3.41 ± 0.02b | 3.61 ± 0.12ab | 3.56 ± 0.11ab | 4.51 ± 0.22c | 4.45 ± 0.14c | 4.56 ± 0.09c |
| Ethanol (mg/g) | 0.28 ± 0.16a | 0.54 ± 0.23a | 2.00 ± 0.68ab | 3.84 ± 1.38b | 5.80 ± 0.17bc | 7.65 ± 0.40c | 9.25 ± 2.63c |
| Ethyl acetate (ug/g) | 56.9 ± 2.42a | 59.5 ± 3.74ab | 70.7 ± 4.10b | 79.7 ± 9.37b | 92.1 ± 1.66b | 127.8 ± 10.20c | 138.8 ± 14.24c |
| Ethyl caproate (ug/g) | ND* | ND | ND | ND | ND | 93.3 ± 5.64a | 96.1 ± 5.80a |
| Ethyl lactate (ug/g) | 441.6 ± 32.96a | 358.6 ± 18.37a | 400.9 ± 28.31a | 41.72 ± 69.04a | 481.8 ± 39.85a | 730.25 ± 25.42b | 876.82 ± 99.47c |
*ND: not detected. All data are presented as means ±standard deviations (n = 3). Values with different letters in a row mean significant differences at P < 0.05 determined by ANOVA
Microbial diversity indices calculated based on the cutoff of 97% identity of 16S rRNA gene or ITS region
| Sample time (day) | Chao1 | Observed species | Shannon index | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16S rRNA gene | ITS gene | 16S rRNA gene | ITS gene | 16S rRNA gene | ITS gene | |
| 1 | 1462 ± 155a | 278.27 ± 52.17a | 976 ± 84a | 170 ± 12a | 7.04 ± 0.26a | 3.84 ± 0.25a |
| 10 | 1414 ± 248a | 346.14 ± 21.58ab | 789 ± 54b | 197 ± 8ab | 5.49 ± 0.19b | 3.99 ± 0.11ab |
| 23 | 566 ± 78b | 609.34 ± 214.43b | 212 ± 9c | 343 ± 136b | 2.56 ± 0.07c | 5.17 ± 1.04bc |
| 34 | 683 ± 138b | 825.28 ± 230.83c | 192 ± 4c | 479 ± 100c | 2.52 ± 0.04c | 6.14 ± 1.01c |
| 48 | 559 ± 119b | 498.68 ± 125.07ab | 198 ± 7c | 276 ± 62ab | 2.56 ± 0.06c | 4.05 ± 0.57ab |
| 59 | 631 ± 97b | 560.67 ± 24.61c | 239 ± 5c | 308 ± 34ab | 2.70 ± 0.07c | 4.33 ± 0.31ab |
| 70 | 784 ± 270b | 777.76 ± 218.55c | 333 ± 200c | 462 ± 106c | 3.07 ± 0.83c | 5.96 ± 0.81c |
*All data were presented as means ± standard deviations. Values with different letters in a column mean significant difference at p < 0.05 tested by one-way ANOVA Duncan’s test
Fig. 1Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) of overall microbial communities at different fermentation stages. a prokaryotic community; b eukaryotic community. Different colors represented different fermentation time and each sampling had three replicates
Fig. 2Relative abundance plots of microbial community composition during the entire fermentation period at phylum level. a prokaryotic community at phylum level, (b) eukaryotic community. Each value was the mean of triplicate samples
Fig. 4Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) of prokaryotic community and flavoring chemicals. The circles with different colors represented microbial communities at different fermentation stages. The triangles in blue represented prokaryotic microbes at family level
Fig. 3Relative abundance plots of microbial community composition during the entire fermentation period. a prokaryotic community at family level, (b) eukaryotic community at genus level. Each value was the mean of triplicate samples
Fig. 5Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) of eukaryotic community and flavoring chemicals. The circles in different colors represented microbial communities at different fermentation stages. The triangles in blue represented eukaryotic microbes at genus level