| Literature DB >> 28915789 |
Majken Pagter1,2, Jessica Alpers1, Alexander Erban1, Joachim Kopka1, Ellen Zuther1, Dirk K Hincha3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: During low temperature exposure, temperate plant species increase their freezing tolerance in a process termed cold acclimation. This is accompanied by dampened oscillations of circadian clock genes and disrupted oscillations of output genes and metabolites. During deacclimation in response to warm temperatures, cold acclimated plants lose freezing tolerance and resume growth and development. While considerable effort has been directed toward understanding the molecular and metabolic basis of cold acclimation, much less information is available about the regulation of deacclimation. <br> RESULTS: We report metabolic (gas chromatography-mass spectrometry) and transcriptional (microarrays, quantitative RT-PCR) responses underlying deacclimation during the first 24 h after a shift of Arabidopsis thaliana (Columbia-0) plants cold acclimated at 4 °C back to warm temperature (20 °C). The data reveal a faster response of the transcriptome than of the metabolome and provide evidence for tightly regulated temporal responses at both levels. Metabolically, deacclimation is associated with decreasing contents of sugars, amino acids, glycolytic and TCA cycle intermediates, indicating an increased need for carbon sources and respiratory energy production for the activation of growth. The early phase of deacclimation also involves extensive down-regulation of protein synthesis and changes in the metabolism of lipids and cell wall components. Hormonal regulation appears particularly important during deacclimation, with extensive changes in the expression of genes related to auxin, gibberellin, brassinosteroid, jasmonate and ethylene metabolism. Members of several transcription factor families that control fundamental aspects of morphogenesis and development are significantly regulated during deacclimation, emphasizing that loss of freezing tolerance and growth resumption are transcriptionally highly interrelated processes. Expression patterns of some clock oscillator components resembled those under warm conditions, indicating at least partial re-activation of the circadian clock during deacclimation. <br> CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first combined metabolomic and transcriptomic analysis of the regulation of deacclimation in cold acclimated plants. The data indicate cascades of rapidly regulated genes and metabolites that underlie the developmental switch resulting in reduced freezing tolerance and the resumption of growth. They constitute a large-scale dataset of genes, metabolites and pathways that are crucial during the initial phase of deacclimation. The data will be an important reference for further analyses of this and other important but under-researched stress deacclimation processes.Entities:
Keywords: Arabidopsis thaliana; Cold acclimation; Deacclimation; Gene expression; Metabolomics; Transcriptomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28915789 PMCID: PMC5602955 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-017-4126-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Fig. 4Global overview of the dynamic changes in primary metabolite pool sizes during deacclimation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plants were non-acclimated (NA) or cold acclimated at 4 °C for 3 d (ACC). Cold acclimated plants were then deacclimated (DEA) at 20 °C for 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 12 h and 24 h. The metabolic profiles were statistically analyzed using a one-way ANOVA at FDR P < 0.05 by comparing all conditions against each other. Metabolites that showed significant changes between treatments were clustered using Euclidian distance and average linkage. Lists with the names of all metabolites in the different clusters indicated by the letters a to f can be found in Additional file 7. The numbers on the right side of the heat map refer to the numbering of the metabolites in Additional file 3
Fig. 1Score plots from principal components analysis (PCA). PCA was applied to a qRT-PCR, b microarray and c GC-MS metabolite profiling data sets. Plants were non-acclimated (black) or cold acclimated at 4 °C for 3 days (red). Cold acclimated plants were then deacclimated at 20 °C for 2 h (blue), 4 h (green), 6 h (orange), 12 h (brown) or 24 h (grey)
Fig. 2Hierarchical clustering of changes in the expression of genes encoding transcripition factors. Hierarchical trees were drawn, based on log2 fold change in relative expression of 476 genes between cold acclimated (CA) and deacclimated and between cold acclimated and non-acclimated (NA) Arabidopsis plants. Plants were cold acclimated at 4 °C for three days and thereafter deacclimated at 20 °C for 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 12 h or 24 h. Genes were selected based on ANOVA analysis to be differentially regulated at least at one time point with a log2 fold change of at least + or −1. Lists with the names of all genes in the different clusters indicated by the letters a to f can be found in Additional file 4
The numbers of up- and down-regulated transcription factor (TF) genes and the ratio between up- and down-regulated TF genes following 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 12 h or 24 h of deacclimation (DEA) at warm temperatures or in non-acclimated (NA) plants
| Treatment | Number of genes | Overlap with genes regulated in the opposite direction after 3 d of CA (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Up-regulated | Down-regulated | Regulated | Ratio | Up-regulated | Down-regulated | |
| 2 h DEA | 26 | 33 | 59 | 0.79 | 43 | 11 |
| 4 h DEA | 3 | 12 | 15 | 0.25 | 6 | 4 |
| 6 h DEA | 0 | 5 | 5 | NA | NA | 1 |
| 12 h DEA | 5 | 16 | 21 | 0.31 | 13 | 5 |
| 24 h DEA | 22 | 284 | 306 | 0.08 | 81 | 88 |
| NA | 16 | 198 | 214 | 0.08 | – | – |
Numbers indicate the genes out of the 476 shown in Fig. 2 that were significantly (FDR P < 0.05) regulated relative to cold acclimated (CA) plants
Transcription factor families significantly enriched in down-regulated genes following 24 h of deacclimation (DEA) and in non-acclimated (NA) relative to cold acclimated plants
| bin | Transcription factor family | 24 h DEA | NA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27.3.11 | C2H2 zinc finger family | X | X |
| 27.3.7 | C2C2(Zn) CO-like, Constans-like zinc finger family | X | X |
| 27.3.26 | MYB-related transcription factor family | X | X |
| 27.3.3 | AP2/EREBP, APETALA2/Ethylene-responsive element binding protein family | X | X |
| 27.3.8 | C2C2(Zn) DOF zinc finger family | X | |
| 27.3.32 | WRKY domain transcription factor family | X | X |
| 27.3.35 | bZIP transcription factor family | X | |
| 27.3.25 | MYB domain transcription factor family | X | X |
| 27.3.22 | HB,Homeobox transcription factor family | X | |
| 27.3.62 | Nucleosome/chromatin assembly factor group | X | X |
| 27.3.16 | CCAAT box binding factor family, HAP5 | X | X |
| 27.3.20 | G2-like transcription factor family, GARP | X | X |
| 27.3.9 | C2C2(Zn) GATA transcription factor family | X | X |
| 27.3.15 | CCAAT box binding factor family, HAP3 | X | X |
| 27.3.18 | E2F/DP transcription factor family | X | |
| 27.3.12 | C3H zinc finger family | X | |
| 27.3.13 | CCAAT box binding factor family, DR1 | X | |
| 27.3.2 | Alfin-like | X | X |
| 27.3.30 | Trihelix, Triple-Helix transcription factor family | X | X |
| 27.3.4 | ARF, Auxin Response Factor family | X | X |
| 27.3.49 | GeBP like | X | X |
| 27.3.57 | JUMONJI family | X | |
| 27.3.6 | bHLH,Basic Helix-Loop-Helix family | X | X |
| 27.3.63 | PHD finger transcription factor | X | X |
| 27.3.24 | MADS box transcription factor family | X | |
| 33.3 | development.squamosa promoter binding like (SPL) | X |
Fields with an X indicate significant enrichment of specific families
The numbers of up- and down-regulated genes and the ratio between up- and down-regulated genes following 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 12 h or 24 h of deacclimation (DEA) at 20 °C of cold acclimated plants of Arabidopsis thaliana
| Treatment | Up-regulated | Down-regulated | Regulated | Ratio (up/down) | Overlap with genes regulated in the opposite direction after 3 d of CA (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Up-regulated | Down-regulated | |||||
| 2 h DEA | 811 | 495 | 1306 | 1.64 | 34 | 23 |
| 4 h DEA | 902 | 766 | 1668 | 1.18 | 36 | 31 |
| 6 h DEA | 1155 | 1025 | 2180 | 1.13 | 38 | 34 |
| 12 h DEA | 1197 | 1381 | 2578 | 0.87 | 46 | 52 |
| 24 h DEA | 1138 | 1197 | 2335 | 0.95 | 72 | 71 |
| NA | 1135 | 1182 | 2317 | 0.96 | – | – |
Also shown are the overlaps between genes differentially expressed in opposite directions after 3 d of cold acclimation (CA) and following different durations of deacclimation
Fig. 3Overrepresentation analysis of genes significantly changed in expression during deacclimation and in non-acclimated (NA) relative to cold acclimated plants. Genes were grouped in MapMan bins and overrepresentation was determined for genes showing either significant up-regulation (top) or down-regulation (bottom) of expression during deacclimation. Blue color indicates significant enrichment of up- or down-regulated genes, red indicates significant depletion. Except for the bin RNA regulation of transcription only the two highest MapMan bin levels are shown. Significant bins at all levels can be found in Additional file 6
Fig. 5Model summarizing early metabolic and transcriptomic responses of Arabidopsis thaliana to deacclimating conditions. Arrows indicate activation or positive influence, lines ending in a T indicate inactivation or negative influence. The two main physiological outcomes (freezing tolerance; growth and development) are highlighted