Literature DB >> 28915366

Structural encoding processes contribute to individual differences in face and object cognition: Inferences from psychometric test performance and event-related brain potentials.

Hadiseh Nowparast Rostami1, Werner Sommer2, Changsong Zhou3, Oliver Wilhelm4, Andrea Hildebrandt5.   

Abstract

The enhanced N1 component in event-related potentials (ERP) to face stimuli, termed N170, is considered to indicate the structural encoding of faces. Previously, individual differences in the latency of the N170 have been related to face and object cognition abilities. By orthogonally manipulating content domain (faces vs objects) and task demands (easy/speed vs difficult/accuracy) in both psychometric and EEG tasks, we investigated the uniqueness of the processes underlying face cognition as compared with object cognition and the extent to which the N1/N170 component can explain individual differences in face and object cognition abilities. Data were recorded from N = 198 healthy young adults. Structural equation modeling (SEM) confirmed that the accuracies of face perception (FP) and memory are specific abilities above general object cognition; in contrast, the speed of face processing was not differentiable from the speed of object cognition. Although there was considerable domain-general variance in the N170 shared with the N1, there was significant face-specific variance in the N170. The brain-behavior relationship showed that faster face-specific processes for structural encoding of faces are associated with higher accuracy in both perceiving and memorizing faces. Moreover, in difficult task conditions, qualitatively different processes are additionally needed for recognizing face and object stimuli as compared with easy tasks. The difficulty-dependent variance components in the N170 amplitude were related with both face and object memory (OM) performance. We discuss implications for understanding individual differences in face cognition.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Brain–behavior relationship; Face and object cognition; Face specificity; N1/N170 components

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28915366     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.08.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  6 in total

1.  Not so fast! Response times in the computerized Benton Face Recognition Test may not reflect face recognition ability.

Authors:  Joseph DeGutis; Xian Li; Bar Yosef; Maruti V Mishra
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2022 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.750

2.  Sex-specific relationships between face memory and the N170 component in event-related potentials.

Authors:  Hadiseh Nowparast Rostami; Andrea Hildebrandt; Werner Sommer
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Use-inspired basic research on individual differences in face identification: implications for criminal investigation and security.

Authors:  Karen Lander; Vicki Bruce; Markus Bindemann
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-06-27

4.  Characteristics of the regulation of the surprise emotion.

Authors:  Chuanlin Zhu; Ping Li; Zhao Zhang; Dianzhi Liu; Wenbo Luo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Are global and specific interindividual differences in cortical thickness associated with facets of cognitive abilities, including face cognition?

Authors:  Kristina Meyer; Benjamín Garzón; Martin Lövdén; Andrea Hildebrandt
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Mapping the Featural and Holistic Face Processing of Bad and Good Face Recognizers.

Authors:  Tessa Marzi; Giorgio Gronchi; Maria Teresa Turano; Fabio Giovannelli; Fiorenza Giganti; Mohamed Rebai; Maria Pia Viggiano
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.