Andrew O M Wilkie1, David Johnson, Steven A Wall. 1. aClinical Genetics Group, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital bOxford Centre for Genomic Medicine, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre cCraniofacial Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, UK.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: When providing accurate clinical diagnosis and genetic counseling in craniosynostosis, the challenge is heightened by knowledge that etiology in any individual case may be entirely genetic, entirely environmental, or anything in between. This review will scope out how recent genetic discoveries from next-generation sequencing have impacted on the clinical genetic evaluation of craniosynostosis. RECENT FINDINGS: Survey of a 13-year birth cohort of patients treated at a single craniofacial unit demonstrates that a genetic cause of craniosynostosis can be identified in one quarter of cases. The substantial contributions of mutations in two genes, TCF12 and ERF, is confirmed. Important recent discoveries are mutations of CDC45 and SMO in specific craniosynostosis syndromes, and of SMAD6 in nonsyndromic midline synostosis. The added value of exome or whole genome sequencing in the diagnosis of difficult cases is highlighted. SUMMARY: Strategies to optimize clinical genetic diagnostic pathways by combining both targeted and next-generation sequencing are discussed. In addition to improved genetic counseling, recent discoveries spotlight the important roles of signaling through the bone morphogenetic protein and hedgehog pathways in cranial suture biogenesis, as well as a key requirement for adequate cell division in suture maintenance.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: When providing accurate clinical diagnosis and genetic counseling in craniosynostosis, the challenge is heightened by knowledge that etiology in any individual case may be entirely genetic, entirely environmental, or anything in between. This review will scope out how recent genetic discoveries from next-generation sequencing have impacted on the clinical genetic evaluation of craniosynostosis. RECENT FINDINGS: Survey of a 13-year birth cohort of patients treated at a single craniofacial unit demonstrates that a genetic cause of craniosynostosis can be identified in one quarter of cases. The substantial contributions of mutations in two genes, TCF12 and ERF, is confirmed. Important recent discoveries are mutations of CDC45 and SMO in specific craniosynostosis syndromes, and of SMAD6 in nonsyndromic midline synostosis. The added value of exome or whole genome sequencing in the diagnosis of difficult cases is highlighted. SUMMARY: Strategies to optimize clinical genetic diagnostic pathways by combining both targeted and next-generation sequencing are discussed. In addition to improved genetic counseling, recent discoveries spotlight the important roles of signaling through the bone morphogenetic protein and hedgehog pathways in cranial suture biogenesis, as well as a key requirement for adequate cell division in suture maintenance.
Authors: Andrew O M Wilkie; Jo C Byren; Jane A Hurst; Jayaratnam Jayamohan; David Johnson; Samantha J L Knight; Tracy Lester; Peter G Richards; Stephen R F Twigg; Steven A Wall Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-07-19 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Amy E Merrill; Anna Sarukhanov; Pavel Krejci; Brian Idoni; Natalia Camacho; Kristine D Estrada; Karen M Lyons; Hannah Deixler; Haynes Robinson; David Chitayat; Cynthia J Curry; Ralph S Lachman; William R Wilcox; Deborah Krakow Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2012-03-01 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Martijn Cornelissen; Bianca den Ottelander; Dimitris Rizopoulos; René van der Hulst; Aebele Mink van der Molen; Chantal van der Horst; Hans Delye; Marie-Lise van Veelen; Gouke Bonsel; Irene Mathijssen Journal: J Craniomaxillofac Surg Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 2.078
Authors: Paul Kruszka; Yonit A Addissie; Colin M P Yarnell; Donald W Hadley; Maria J Guillen Sacoto; Petra Platte; Yvonne Paelecke; Hartmut Collmann; Nicole Snow; Tilmann Schweitzer; Simeon A Boyadjiev; Christos Aravidis; Samantha E Hall; John B Mulliken; Tony Roscioli; Maximilian Muenke Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2016-01-06 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Amy E Merrill; Elena G Bochukova; Sean M Brugger; Mamoru Ishii; Daniela T Pilz; Steven A Wall; Karen M Lyons; Andrew O M Wilkie; Robert E Maxson Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2006-03-15 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Jacqueline A C Goos; Aimee L Fenwick; Sigrid M A Swagemakers; Simon J McGowan; Samantha J L Knight; Stephen R F Twigg; A Jeannette M Hoogeboom; Marieke F van Dooren; Frank J Magielsen; Steven A Wall; Irene M J Mathijssen; Andrew O M Wilkie; Peter J van der Spek; Ans M W van den Ouweland Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2016-06-02 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: Jacqueline A C Goos; Walter K Vogel; Hana Mlcochova; Christopher J Millard; Elahe Esfandiari; Wisam H Selman; Eduardo Calpena; Nils Koelling; Evan L Carpenter; Sigrid M A Swagemakers; Peter J van der Spek; Theresa M Filtz; John W R Schwabe; Urszula T Iwaniec; Irene M J Mathijssen; Mark Leid; Stephen R F Twigg Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Ram Singh; Ana S A Cohen; Cathryn Poulton; Tina Duelund Hjortshøj; Moe Akahira-Azuma; Geetu Mendiratta; Wahab A Khan; Dimitar N Azmanov; Karen J Woodward; Maria Kirchhoff; Lisong Shi; Lisa Edelmann; Gareth Baynam; Stuart A Scott; Ethylin Wang Jabs Journal: Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud Date: 2021-06-11