OBJECTIVES: We describe the first cohort-based analysis of the impact of genetic disorders in craniosynostosis. We aimed to refine the understanding of prognoses and pathogenesis and to provide rational criteria for clinical genetic testing. METHODS: We undertook targeted molecular genetic and cytogenetic testing for 326 children who required surgery because of craniosynostosis, were born in 1993-2002, presented to a single craniofacial unit, and were monitored until the end of 2007. RESULTS: Eighty-four children (and 64 relatives) had pathologic genetic alterations (86% single-gene mutations and 14% chromosomal abnormalities). The FGFR3 P250R mutation was the single largest contributor (24%) to the genetic group. Genetic diagnoses accounted for 21% of all craniosynostosis cases and were associated with increased rates of many complications. Children with an initial clinical diagnosis of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis were more likely to have a causative mutation if the synostoses were unicoronal or bicoronal (10 of 48 cases) than if they were sagittal or metopic (0 of 55 cases; P = .0003). Repeat craniofacial surgery was required for 58% of children with single-gene mutations but only 17% of those with chromosomal abnormalities (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical genetic assessment is critical for the treatment of children with craniosynostosis. Genetic testing of nonsyndromic cases (at least for FGFR3 P250R and FGFR2 exons IIIa/c) should be targeted to patients with coronal or multisuture synostoses. Single-gene disorders that disrupt physiologic signaling in the cranial sutures often require reoperation, whereas chromosomal abnormalities follow a more-indolent course, which suggests a different, secondary origin of the associated craniosynostosis.
OBJECTIVES: We describe the first cohort-based analysis of the impact of genetic disorders in craniosynostosis. We aimed to refine the understanding of prognoses and pathogenesis and to provide rational criteria for clinical genetic testing. METHODS: We undertook targeted molecular genetic and cytogenetic testing for 326 children who required surgery because of craniosynostosis, were born in 1993-2002, presented to a single craniofacial unit, and were monitored until the end of 2007. RESULTS: Eighty-four children (and 64 relatives) had pathologic genetic alterations (86% single-gene mutations and 14% chromosomal abnormalities). The FGFR3P250R mutation was the single largest contributor (24%) to the genetic group. Genetic diagnoses accounted for 21% of all craniosynostosis cases and were associated with increased rates of many complications. Children with an initial clinical diagnosis of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis were more likely to have a causative mutation if the synostoses were unicoronal or bicoronal (10 of 48 cases) than if they were sagittal or metopic (0 of 55 cases; P = .0003). Repeat craniofacial surgery was required for 58% of children with single-gene mutations but only 17% of those with chromosomal abnormalities (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical genetic assessment is critical for the treatment of children with craniosynostosis. Genetic testing of nonsyndromic cases (at least for FGFR3P250R and FGFR2 exons IIIa/c) should be targeted to patients with coronal or multisuture synostoses. Single-gene disorders that disrupt physiologic signaling in the cranial sutures often require reoperation, whereas chromosomal abnormalities follow a more-indolent course, which suggests a different, secondary origin of the associated craniosynostosis.
Authors: N Elanko; J S Sibbring; K A Metcalfe; J Clayton-Smith; D Donnai; I K Temple; S A Wall; A O Wilkie Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: Shih-hsin Kan; Navaratnam Elanko; David Johnson; Laura Cornejo-Roldan; Jackie Cook; Elsa W Reich; Susan Tomkins; Alain Verloes; Stephen R F Twigg; Sahan Rannan-Eliya; Donna M McDonald-McGinn; Elaine H Zackai; Steven A Wall; Maximilian Muenke; Andrew O M Wilkie Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2002-01-04 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Arun K Gosain; Timothy D Santoro; Robert J Havlik; Steven R Cohen; Ralph E Holmes Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Eric Arnaud; Pedro Meneses; Elizabeth Lajeunie; John A Thorne; Daniel Marchac; Dominique Renier Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Stephen R F Twigg; Rui Kan; Christian Babbs; Elena G Bochukova; Stephen P Robertson; Steven A Wall; Gillian M Morriss-Kay; Andrew O M Wilkie Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-05-27 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Yann Heuzé; Neus Martínez-Abadías; Jennifer M Stella; Craig W Senders; Simeon A Boyadjiev; Lun-Jou Lo; Joan T Richtsmeier Journal: J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 2.656
Authors: Jeffry M Cesario; André Landin Malt; Jong Uk Chung; Michael P Khairallah; Krishnakali Dasgupta; Kesava Asam; Lindsay J Deacon; Veronica Choi; Asma A Almaidhan; Nadine A Darwiche; Jimin Kim; Randy L Johnson; Juhee Jeong Journal: Dev Biol Date: 2018-05-28 Impact factor: 3.582
Authors: Xiaoqian Ye; Audrey Guilmatre; Boris Reva; Inga Peter; Yann Heuzé; Joan T Richtsmeier; Deborah J Fox; Rhinda J Goedken; Ethylin Wang Jabs; Paul A Romitti Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 4.730