Literature DB >> 28914355

Nasal injury and comfort with jet versus bubble continuous positive airway pressure delivery systems in preterm infants with respiratory distress.

Jafar Khan1, Venkataseshan Sundaram2, Srinivas Murki1, Anuj Bhatti3, Shiv Sajan Saini3, Praveen Kumar3.   

Abstract

Nasal injuries with use of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) range from blanching of nasal tip to septal necrosis and septal drop. This analysis was done in preterm neonates of < 34-week gestation, who received nasal CPAP as primary support as part of a randomized trial comparing Jet device with Bubble device for delivery of CPAP, both through nasal prongs of different structure, make and fixation methods. Nasal injury was assessed using a validated nasal injury score. Out of 170 neonates enrolled, 103 (61%) had nasal injuries; moderate and severe injuries were observed in 18 (11%) and 8 (5%) infants, respectively. Septum was the most common site injured. The incidence and severity of nasal injury were significantly lesser in Jet group compared to Bubble group [RR 0.6 (95% C.I. 0.5-0.8); p < 0.001]. Similarly, neonates in Jet group had lesser average [median (IQR): 3 (3,4) vs. 4 [8, 14]; p = 0.04] as well as peak N-PASS pain scores [median (IQR): 4 [8, 14] vs. 5 [13, 16]; p = 0.01] in comparison to Bubble group. However, Jet group neonates had significantly more common prong displacements.
CONCLUSION: Bubble CPAP device with its nasal interface had higher and more serious incidence of nasal injuries in comparison to Jet CPAP device. What is known: • Nasal injuries are becoming increasingly common with use of nasal CPAP low gestational age, low birth weight, longer use of CPAP and longer NICU stay are risk factors for such injuries • Validated nasal injury scores have been created for assessment of nasal trauma in neonates What is new: • Bubble device with its interface had higher and more serious incidence of nasal injuries in comparison to Jet device • Even though pain assessed by N-PASS was less with Jet device, prong displacements were more frequent with its system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bubble CPAP; Jet CPAP; Nasal injury; Pain; Preterm

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28914355     DOI: 10.1007/s00431-017-3016-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr        ISSN: 0340-6199            Impact factor:   3.183


  15 in total

1.  Nasal Jet-CPAP (variable flow) versus Bubble-CPAP in preterm infants with respiratory distress: an open label, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  A Bhatti; J Khan; S Murki; V Sundaram; S S Saini; P Kumar
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Nasal deformities resulting from flow driver continuous positive airway pressure.

Authors:  N J Robertson; L S McCarthy; P A Hamilton; A L Moss
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  A valve substitute with no moving parts, for artificial ventilation in newborn and small infants.

Authors:  D Benveniste; J E Pedersen
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1968-06       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Treatment strategy for iatrogenic nasal vestibular stenosis in young children.

Authors:  Lee P Smith; Soham Roy
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-03-27       Impact factor: 1.675

5.  A comparison of nasal trauma in preterm infants extubated to either heated humidified high-flow nasal cannulae or nasal continuous positive airway pressure.

Authors:  C L Collins; C Barfield; R S C Horne; P G Davis
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 3.183

6.  Incidence of nasal trauma associated with nasal prong versus nasal mask during continuous positive airway pressure treatment in very low birthweight infants: a randomised control study.

Authors:  S-C Yong; S-J Chen; N-Y Boo
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 5.747

7.  Clinical reliability and validity of the N-PASS: neonatal pain, agitation and sedation scale with prolonged pain.

Authors:  P Hummel; M Puchalski; S D Creech; M G Weiss
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 2.521

8.  Comparison of two nasal prongs for application of continuous positive airway pressure in neonates.

Authors:  Maria A. C. Rego; Francisco E. Martinez
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.624

9.  Advantages and disadvantages of different nasal CPAP systems in newborns.

Authors:  V Buettiker; M I Hug; O Baenziger; C Meyer; B Frey
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-03-24       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 10.  Devices and pressure sources for administration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm neonates.

Authors:  A G De Paoli; P G Davis; B Faber; C J Morley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23
View more
  7 in total

1.  Reply to: "Nasal injury and comfort with jet versus bubble continuous positive airway pressure delivery systems in preterm infants with respiratory distress".

Authors:  R Elia; E Nacchiero; M Vestita; M Maruccia
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 2.  Neonatal Pain, Agitation, and Sedation Scale's use, reliability, and validity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mikayla E Morgan; Stephanie Kukora; Michelle Nemshak; Clayton J Shuman
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  Impact of Systematic Training and CPAP Checklist in the Prevention of NCPAP Related Nasal Injuries in Neonates- A Quality Improvement Study.

Authors:  Suja Mariam; Siddartha Buddhavarapu
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 4.  Non-invasive Respiratory Support of the Premature Neonate: From Physics to Bench to Practice.

Authors:  Ibrahim Sammour; Sreenivas Karnati
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 3.418

Review 5.  Noninvasive Respiratory Support in Neonates: A Review of Current Evidence and Practices.

Authors:  Rajendra Prasad Anne; Srinivas Murki
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 1.967

6.  'Nasal mask' in comparison with 'nasal prongs' or 'rotation of nasal mask with nasal prongs' reduce the incidence of nasal injury in preterm neonates supported on nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP): A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Tanveer Bashir; Srinivas Murki; Sai Kiran; Venkat Kallem Reddy; Tejo Pratap Oleti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  RAM cannula with Cannulaide versus Hudson prongs for delivery of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants: an RCT.

Authors:  Shravani Maram; Srinivas Murki; Sidharth Nayyar; Sandeep Kadam; Tejo Pratap Oleti; Rajendra Prasad Anne; Saikiran Deshobhotla; Deepak Sharma; Subhash Arun; Praveen Rao Vadije
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.