Literature DB >> 28914311

Comparing Caenorhabditis elegans gentle and harsh touch response behavior using a multiplexed hydraulic microfluidic device.

Patrick D McClanahan1, Joyce H Xu, Christopher Fang-Yen.   

Abstract

The roundworm Caenorhabditis elegans is an important model system for understanding the genetics and physiology of touch. Classical assays for C. elegans touch, which involve manually touching the animal with a probe and observing its response, are limited by their low throughput and qualitative nature. We developed a microfluidic device in which several dozen animals are subject to spatially localized mechanical stimuli with variable amplitude. The device contains 64 sinusoidal channels through which worms crawl, and hydraulic valves that deliver touch stimuli to the worms. We used this assay to characterize the behavioral responses to gentle touch stimuli and the less well studied harsh (nociceptive) touch stimuli. First, we measured the relative response thresholds of gentle and harsh touch. Next, we quantified differences in the receptive fields between wild type worms and a mutant with non-functioning posterior touch receptor neurons. We showed that under gentle touch the receptive field of the anterior touch receptor neurons extends into the posterior half of the body. Finally, we found that the behavioral response to gentle touch does not depend on the locomotion of the animal immediately prior to the stimulus, but does depend on the location of the previous touch. Responses to harsh touch, on the other hand, did not depend on either previous velocity or stimulus location. Differences in gentle and harsh touch response characteristics may reflect the different innervation of the respective mechanosensory cells. Our assay will facilitate studies of mechanosensation, sensory adaptation, and nociception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28914311      PMCID: PMC5645015          DOI: 10.1039/c7ib00120g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)        ISSN: 1757-9694            Impact factor:   2.192


  34 in total

Review 1.  Molecular mechanisms of nociception.

Authors:  D Julius; A I Basbaum
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-09-13       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Genetic control of differentiation of the Caenorhabditis elegans touch receptor neurons.

Authors:  M Chalfie; M Au
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-02-24       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Maintenance of C. elegans.

Authors:  Theresa Stiernagle
Journal:  WormBook       Date:  2006-02-11

4.  The neural circuit for touch sensitivity in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  M Chalfie; J E Sulston; J G White; E Southgate; J N Thomson; S Brenner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Developmental genetics of the mechanosensory neurons of Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  M Chalfie; J Sulston
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 3.582

6.  Pneumatic stimulation of C. elegans mechanoreceptor neurons in a microfluidic trap.

Authors:  Adam L Nekimken; Holger Fehlauer; Anna A Kim; Sandra N Manosalvas-Kjono; Purim Ladpli; Farah Memon; Divya Gopisetty; Veronica Sanchez; Miriam B Goodman; Beth L Pruitt; Michael Krieg
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 6.799

7.  Modulation of C. elegans touch sensitivity is integrated at multiple levels.

Authors:  Xiaoyin Chen; Martin Chalfie
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Effects of strain rate, mixing ratio, and stress-strain definition on the mechanical behavior of the polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) material as related to its biological applications.

Authors:  Khalil Khanafer; Ambroise Duprey; Marty Schlicht; Ramon Berguer
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.838

9.  The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  S Brenner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  A stochastic neuronal model predicts random search behaviors at multiple spatial scales in C. elegans.

Authors:  Steven B Augustine; Kristy J Lawton; Theodore H Lindsay; Tod R Thiele; William M Roberts; Eduardo J Izquierdo; Serge Faumont; Rebecca A Lindsay; Matthew Cale Britton; Navin Pokala; Cornelia I Bargmann; Shawn R Lockery
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  8 in total

1.  The tactile receptive fields of freely moving Caenorhabditis elegans nematodes.

Authors:  E A Mazzochette; A L Nekimken; F Loizeau; J Whitworth; B Huynh; M B Goodman; B L Pruitt
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  Temporal processing and context dependency in Caenorhabditis elegans response to mechanosensation.

Authors:  Mochi Liu; Anuj K Sharma; Joshua W Shaevitz; Andrew M Leifer
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Touch-induced mechanical strain in somatosensory neurons is independent of extracellular matrix mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Adam L Nekimken; Beth L Pruitt; Miriam B Goodman
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.138

4.  A high-throughput method to deliver targeted optogenetic stimulation to moving C. elegans populations.

Authors:  Mochi Liu; Sandeep Kumar; Anuj K Sharma; Andrew M Leifer
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 8.029

5.  On-chip functional neuroimaging with mechanical stimulation in Caenorhabditis elegans larvae for studying development and neural circuits.

Authors:  Yongmin Cho; David N Oakland; Sol Ah Lee; William R Schafer; Hang Lu
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 6.  How Caenorhabditis elegans Senses Mechanical Stress, Temperature, and Other Physical Stimuli.

Authors:  Miriam B Goodman; Piali Sengupta
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Targeted thermal stimulation and high-content phenotyping reveal that the C. elegans escape response integrates current behavioral state and past experience.

Authors:  Jarlath Byrne Rodgers; William S Ryu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Bioelectronics for Millimeter-Sized Model Organisms.

Authors:  Daniel L Gonzales; Krishna N Badhiwala; Benjamin W Avants; Jacob T Robinson
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2020-02-14
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.