Literature DB >> 28914180

Symptoms-Based Phenotypes Among Women With Dysmenorrhea: A Latent Class Analysis.

Chen X Chen1, Susan Ofner1, Giorgos Bakoyannis1, Kristine L Kwekkeboom2, Janet S Carpenter1.   

Abstract

Dysmenorrhea is highly prevalent and may increase women's risk for developing other chronic pain conditions. Although it is highly variable, symptom-based dysmenorrhea phenotypes have not been identified. The aims of the study were to identify symptom-based dysmenorrhea phenotypes and examine their relationships with demographic and clinical characteristics. In a cross-sectional study, 762 women with dysmenorrhea rated severity of 14 dysmenorrhea-related symptoms. Using latent class analysis, we identified three distinctive phenotypes. Women in the "mild localized pain" phenotype ( n = 202, 26.51%) had mild abdominal cramps and dull abdominal pain/discomfort. Women in the "severe localized pain" phenotype ( n = 412, 54.07%) had severe abdominal cramps. Women in the "multiple severe symptoms" phenotype ( n = 148, 19.42%) had severe pain at multiple locations and multiple gastrointestinal symptoms. Race, ethnicity, age, and comorbid chronic pain conditions were significantly associated with phenotypes. Identification of these symptom-based phenotypes provides a foundation for research examining genotype-phenotype associations, etiologic mechanisms, and/or variability in treatment responses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chronic pain; dysmenorrhea; menstruation; pelvic pain; phenotype

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28914180      PMCID: PMC5832523          DOI: 10.1177/0193945917731778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Nurs Res        ISSN: 0193-9459            Impact factor:   1.967


  31 in total

Review 1.  Cut points on 0-10 numeric rating scales for symptoms included in the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale in cancer patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Wendy H Oldenmenger; Pleun J de Raaf; Cora de Klerk; Carin C D van der Rijt
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  A modest proposal to investigate chronic uterine pain.

Authors:  F F Tu; S As-Sanie
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 6.531

3.  Representativeness of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Internet panel.

Authors:  Honghu Liu; David Cella; Richard Gershon; Jie Shen; Leo S Morales; William Riley; Ron D Hays
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 4.  Primary dysmenorrhea: advances in pathogenesis and management.

Authors:  M Yusoff Dawood
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Relationship between stage, site and morphological characteristics of pelvic endometriosis and pain.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  A qualitative study to develop a patient-reported outcome for dysmenorrhea.

Authors:  Allison Martin Nguyen; Louise Humphrey; Helen Kitchen; Tayyaba Rehman; Josephine M Norquist
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Viscero-visceral hyperalgesia: characterization in different clinical models.

Authors:  Maria Adele Giamberardino; Raffaele Costantini; Giannapia Affaitati; Alessandra Fabrizio; Domenico Lapenna; Emmanuele Tafuri; Andrea Mezzetti
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 8.  Self-report pain and symptom measures for primary dysmenorrhoea: a critical review.

Authors:  C X Chen; K L Kwekkeboom; S E Ward
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.931

9.  Prevalene of perimenstrual symptoms.

Authors:  N F Woods; A Most; G K Dery
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 10.  What we know about primary dysmenorrhea today: a critical review.

Authors:  Stella Iacovides; Ingrid Avidon; Fiona C Baker
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 15.610

View more
  6 in total

1.  Somatic symptoms in women with dysmenorrhea and noncyclic pelvic pain.

Authors:  Rebecca M Zuckerman; Rebecca L Silton; Frank F Tu; Joshua S Eng; Kevin M Hellman
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Perceived Ineffectiveness of Pharmacological Treatments for Dysmenorrhea.

Authors:  Chen X Chen; Janet S Carpenter; Michelle LaPradd; Susan Ofner; J Dennis Fortenberry
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 3.017

3.  Associations Between Dysmenorrhea Symptom-Based Phenotypes and Vaginal Microbiome: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Chen X Chen; Janet S Carpenter; Xiang Gao; Evelyn Toh; Qunfeng Dong; David E Nelson; Caroline Mitchell; J Dennis Fortenberry
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2021 Jul-Aug 01       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Experimental evaluation of central pain processes in young women with primary dysmenorrhea.

Authors:  Laura A Payne; Laura C Seidman; Myung-Shin Sim; Andrea J Rapkin; Bruce D Naliboff; Lonnie K Zeltzer
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 7.926

5.  Comparing dysmenorrhea beliefs and self-management techniques across symptom-based phenotypes.

Authors:  Sarah Katherine Rogers; Kevin L Rand; Chen Xiao Chen
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 4.423

6.  Dysmenorrhea Symptom-Based Phenotypes: A Replication and Extension Study.

Authors:  Chen X Chen; Janet S Carpenter; Susan Ofner; Michelle LaPradd; J Dennis Fortenberry
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2021 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 2.381

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.