Literature DB >> 33026968

Perceived Ineffectiveness of Pharmacological Treatments for Dysmenorrhea.

Chen X Chen1, Janet S Carpenter2, Michelle LaPradd3, Susan Ofner3, J Dennis Fortenberry4.   

Abstract

Background: Dysmenorrhea affects most reproductive-aged women. Common dysmenorrhea treatments vary in their effectiveness across individuals. Little is known about factors associated with perceived treatment ineffectiveness. The objectives of this study were to describe the perceived ineffectiveness of common pharmacological treatments for dysmenorrhea and investigate factors associated with perceived treatment ineffectiveness. Materials and
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 678 women with dysmenorrhea (aged 14-42) provided data on perceived treatment ineffectiveness, dysmenorrhea symptom-based phenotypes, demographics, clinical factors, and psychobehavioral characteristics. We used Fisher's exact tests to compare treatment ineffectiveness across three symptom-based phenotypes. We used logistic regressions to explore associations of phenotype, demographic, clinical, and psychobehavioral correlates of perceived treatment ineffectiveness.
Results: Percentages perceiving treatments as ineffective were 29.3%-35.6% nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 49.9% acetaminophen, and 39.3% combined oral contraceptive pills (OCPs). Factors associated with perceived ineffectiveness varied across treatments and included symptom-based phenotypes, clinical, and psychobehavioral factors. For ibuprofen and acetaminophen, women with severe (vs. mild) pain phenotype and higher number of chronic pain conditions were more likely to perceive the treatments as ineffective. For OCPs, women with severe pain (vs. mild) phenotype, comorbid gynecological condition, less anxiety, and worse depressive symptoms were more likely to perceive the treatment as ineffective.
Conclusion: A significant percentage of women reported ineffectiveness of dysmenorrhea treatments. Phenotypes, clinical, and psychobehavioral factors were associated with treatment ineffectiveness. Future research should test if symptom-based phenotypes are associated with treatment effectiveness in clinical trials and investigate other factors that affect dysmenorrhea treatment effectiveness, so treatments can be tailored to individuals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chronic pain; dysmenorrhea; pain; pelvic pain; treatment outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33026968      PMCID: PMC8558084          DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   3.017


  46 in total

Review 1.  Theoretical perspectives on the relation between catastrophizing and pain.

Authors:  M J Sullivan; B Thorn; J A Haythornthwaite; F Keefe; M Martin; L A Bradley; J C Lefebvre
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.442

2.  Differences in the single-oral-dose pharmacokinetics and urinary excretion of paracetamol and its conjugates between Hong Kong Chinese and Caucasian subjects.

Authors:  J A J H Critchley; L A H Critchley; P J Anderson; B Tomlinson
Journal:  J Clin Pharm Ther       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 3.  Phenotype-driven preventive strategies for migraine and other headaches.

Authors:  Steve D Wheeler
Journal:  Neurologist       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.398

Review 4.  Self-report pain and symptom measures for primary dysmenorrhoea: a critical review.

Authors:  C X Chen; K L Kwekkeboom; S E Ward
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.931

5.  Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and changing attitudes toward dysmenorrhea.

Authors:  M Y Dawood
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1988-05-20       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Clinical validity of PROMIS Depression, Anxiety, and Anger across diverse clinical samples.

Authors:  Benjamin D Schalet; Paul A Pilkonis; Lan Yu; Nathan Dodds; Kelly L Johnston; Susan Yount; William Riley; David Cella
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Epidemiology of adolescent dysmenorrhea.

Authors:  J R Klein; I F Litt
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Bleeding out the quality-adjusted life years: evaluating the burden of primary dysmenorrhea using time trade-off and willingness-to-pay methods.

Authors:  Fanni Rencz; Márta Péntek; Peep F M Stalmeier; Valentin Brodszky; Gábor Ruzsa; Edina Gradvohl; Petra Baji; László Gulácsi
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Characteristics of fibromyalgia independently predict poorer long-term analgesic outcomes following total knee and hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Chad M Brummett; Andrew G Urquhart; Afton L Hassett; Alex Tsodikov; Brian R Hallstrom; Nathan I Wood; David A Williams; Daniel J Clauw
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 10.995

10.  Association of Hormonal Contraception With Depression.

Authors:  Charlotte Wessel Skovlund; Lina Steinrud Mørch; Lars Vedel Kessing; Øjvind Lidegaard
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 21.596

View more
  2 in total

1.  Associations Between Dysmenorrhea Symptom-Based Phenotypes and Vaginal Microbiome: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Chen X Chen; Janet S Carpenter; Xiang Gao; Evelyn Toh; Qunfeng Dong; David E Nelson; Caroline Mitchell; J Dennis Fortenberry
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2021 Jul-Aug 01       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Primary Dysmenorrhea: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment Updates.

Authors:  Rania Itani; Lama Soubra; Samar Karout; Deema Rahme; Lina Karout; Hani M J Khojah
Journal:  Korean J Fam Med       Date:  2022-03-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.