Nicole M Alberts1, Heather D Hadjistavropoulos2, Nickolai Titov3, Blake F Dear3. 1. Department of Psychology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA. nicole.alberts@stjude.org. 2. Department of Psychology, University of Regina, 3737 Wascana Parkway, Regina, SK, S4S 0A2, Canada. 3. eCentreClinic, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Although most cancer survivors adjust well, a subset experiences clinical levels of anxiety and depression following cancer treatment. Internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy (iCBT) is a promising intervention for symptoms of anxiety and depression among survivors; however, patient and provider perceptions of iCBT have not been examined. METHODS: We employed an exploratory qualitative method and conducted semi-structured interviews with 13 cancer survivors and 10 providers to examine iCBT strengths and weaknesses, areas for improvement, and perceived barriers to program completion. A thematic content analysis approach was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: The majority of survivors liked the flexible, convenient, and private nature of the program. Many viewed the program as helping them feel less alone following cancer treatment. Areas of improvement included suggestions of additional information regarding cancer treatment side effects. Barriers to completing the program were identified by a minority of survivors and included finding time to complete the program and current symptoms. Providers liked the program's accessibility and its ability to provide support to patients after cancer treatment. All providers perceived the program as useful in their current work with survivors. Concerns around the fit of the program (e.g., for particular patients) were expressed by a minority of providers. CONCLUSIONS: Results provide additional evidence for the acceptability of an iCBT program among recent cancer survivors and providers in oncology settings. The current study highlights the value of research exploring iCBT for cancer survivors and provides insights for other groups considering Internet-delivered care for survivors.
PURPOSE: Although most cancer survivors adjust well, a subset experiences clinical levels of anxiety and depression following cancer treatment. Internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy (iCBT) is a promising intervention for symptoms of anxiety and depression among survivors; however, patient and provider perceptions of iCBT have not been examined. METHODS: We employed an exploratory qualitative method and conducted semi-structured interviews with 13 cancer survivors and 10 providers to examine iCBT strengths and weaknesses, areas for improvement, and perceived barriers to program completion. A thematic content analysis approach was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: The majority of survivors liked the flexible, convenient, and private nature of the program. Many viewed the program as helping them feel less alone following cancer treatment. Areas of improvement included suggestions of additional information regarding cancer treatment side effects. Barriers to completing the program were identified by a minority of survivors and included finding time to complete the program and current symptoms. Providers liked the program's accessibility and its ability to provide support to patients after cancer treatment. All providers perceived the program as useful in their current work with survivors. Concerns around the fit of the program (e.g., for particular patients) were expressed by a minority of providers. CONCLUSIONS: Results provide additional evidence for the acceptability of an iCBT program among recent cancer survivors and providers in oncology settings. The current study highlights the value of research exploring iCBT for cancer survivors and provides insights for other groups considering Internet-delivered care for survivors.
Authors: Roy A Willems; Catherine A W Bolman; Ilse Mesters; Iris M Kanera; Audrey A J M Beaulen; Lilian Lechner Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2016-03-14 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Iris Maria Kanera; Roy A Willems; Catherine A W Bolman; Ilse Mesters; Victor Zambon; Brigitte Cm Gijsen; Lilian Lechner Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2016-08-23 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Caryn Chan Mei Hsien; Wan Azmad Wan Azman; Mastura Md Yusof; Gwo Fuang Ho; Edward Krupat Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2012-10-03 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Anna C Muriel; Vivian S Hwang; Alice Kornblith; Joseph Greer; Donna B Greenberg; Jennifer Temel; Lidia Schapira; William Pirl Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Nicole M Alberts; Wendy M Leisenring; Jessica S Flynn; Jillian Whitton; Todd M Gibson; Lindsay Jibb; Aaron McDonald; James Ford; Neema Moraveji; Blake F Dear; Kevin R Krull; Leslie L Robison; Jennifer N Stinson; Gregory T Armstrong Journal: JCO Clin Cancer Inform Date: 2020-11
Authors: Robert Persson Asplund; Anna Jäderlind; Isabel Höijer Björk; Brjánn Ljótsson; Per Carlbring; Gerhard Andersson Journal: Internet Interv Date: 2019-10-28
Authors: Fiona Davies; Heather L Shepherd; Lisa Beatty; Brodie Clark; Phyllis Butow; Joanne Shaw Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-07-23 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Monica Leslie; Lisa Beatty; Lee Hulbert-Williams; Rosina Pendrous; Tim Cartwright; Richard Jackson; Nicholas J Hulbert-Williams Journal: JMIR Cancer Date: 2022-07-08