Jessica R Gorman1, Anne K Julian2, Samantha A Roberts3, Sally A D Romero4, Jennifer L Ehren5, Michael L Krychman6,7, Sarah G Boles3, Jun Mao4, H Irene Su3. 1. School of Social and Behavioral Health Sciences, Oregon State University College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA. Jessica.Gorman@oregonstate.edu. 2. School of Social and Behavioral Health Sciences, Oregon State University College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA. 3. Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA. 4. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA. 5. University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA. 6. Southern California Center for Sexual Health and Survivorship Medicine, Newport Beach, CA, 92663, USA. 7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Reproductive-aged breast cancer survivors (BCS) who have completed initial cancer treatment frequently want to know about their future fertility potential. The purpose of this qualitative study was to assess if the fertility-related content presented in the survivorship care plan prototype met the informational needs of post-treatment BCS and to provide an opportunity for the target audience to review and react to the proposed content and design. METHODS: We conducted and analyzed transcripts from seven focus groups with BCS to evaluate their reactions to the survivorship care plan prototype. We independently coded transcripts for consistent themes and sub-themes and used a consensus-building approach to agree on interpretation of results. RESULTS: We identified five themes that describe the post-treatment BCS' responses to the prototype survivorship care plan in the context of their informational needs and experiences: (1) the prototype's fertility-related information is relevant; (2) desire for clinical parameters to help survivors understand their infertility risk; (3) fertility-related information is important throughout survivorship; (4) evidence-based content from a neutral source is trustworthy; and (5) the recommendation to see a fertility specialist is helpful, but cost is a barrier. CONCLUSIONS: BCS have concerns and needs related to their fertility potential after initial breast cancer treatment. The evidence-based information offered in our prototype survivorship care plan was acceptable to BCS and has significant potential to address these needs. Additional primary data that identify post-cancer treatment indicators of fertility would advance this effort.
PURPOSE: Reproductive-aged breast cancer survivors (BCS) who have completed initial cancer treatment frequently want to know about their future fertility potential. The purpose of this qualitative study was to assess if the fertility-related content presented in the survivorship care plan prototype met the informational needs of post-treatment BCS and to provide an opportunity for the target audience to review and react to the proposed content and design. METHODS: We conducted and analyzed transcripts from seven focus groups with BCS to evaluate their reactions to the survivorship care plan prototype. We independently coded transcripts for consistent themes and sub-themes and used a consensus-building approach to agree on interpretation of results. RESULTS: We identified five themes that describe the post-treatment BCS' responses to the prototype survivorship care plan in the context of their informational needs and experiences: (1) the prototype's fertility-related information is relevant; (2) desire for clinical parameters to help survivors understand their infertility risk; (3) fertility-related information is important throughout survivorship; (4) evidence-based content from a neutral source is trustworthy; and (5) the recommendation to see a fertility specialist is helpful, but cost is a barrier. CONCLUSIONS: BCS have concerns and needs related to their fertility potential after initial breast cancer treatment. The evidence-based information offered in our prototype survivorship care plan was acceptable to BCS and has significant potential to address these needs. Additional primary data that identify post-cancer treatment indicators of fertility would advance this effort.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer; Communication; Fertility; Reproductive health; Survivorship; Survivorship care plan
Authors: Kathryn J Ruddy; Shari Gelber; Elizabeth S Ginsburg; Lidia Schapira; Mary E Abusief; Meghan E Meyer; Ann H Partridge Journal: Menopause Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Alison W Loren; Pamela B Mangu; Lindsay Nohr Beck; Lawrence Brennan; Anthony J Magdalinski; Ann H Partridge; Gwendolyn Quinn; W Hamish Wallace; Kutluk Oktay Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-05-28 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: H Irene Su; Mary D Sammel; Jamie Green; Luke Velders; Corrie Stankiewicz; Jennifer Matro; Ellen W Freeman; Clarisa R Gracia; Angela DeMichele Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-02-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Peter F Coccia; Jessica Altman; Smita Bhatia; Scott C Borinstein; Joseph Flynn; Suzanne George; Robert Goldsby; Robert Hayashi; Mary S Huang; Rebecca H Johnson; Lynda Kwon Beaupin; Michael P Link; Kevin C Oeffinger; Kathleen M Orr; Alberto S Pappo; Damon Reed; Holly L Spraker; Deborah A Thomas; Margaret von Mehren; Daniel S Wechsler; Kimberly F Whelan; Bradley J Zebrack; Hema Sundar; Dorothy A Shead Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Nina S Kadan-Lottick; Leslie L Robison; James G Gurney; Joseph P Neglia; Yutaka Yasui; Robert Hayashi; Melissa Hudson; Mark Greenberg; Ann C Mertens Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-04-10 Impact factor: 157.335
Authors: Shaylyn S Stark; Loki Natarajan; Diana Chingos; Jennifer Ehren; Jessica R Gorman; Michael Krychman; Brian Kwan; Jun J Mao; Emily Myers; Tom Walpole; John P Pierce; H Irene Su Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-12-12 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Leah Cha; Amye J Tevaarwerk; Elena M Smith; Thevaa Chandereng; Karol J Huenerberg; Lori A Seaborne; Cibele B Carroll; Mary E Sesto Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2021-04-26 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: H Irene Su; Shaylyn Stark; Brian Kwan; Sarah Boles; Diana Chingos; Jennifer Ehren; Jessica R Gorman; Michael Krychman; Sally A D Romero; Jun J Mao; John P Pierce; Loki Natarajan Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2019-05-03 Impact factor: 4.872