Literature DB >> 28913452

Regional anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia techniques for spine surgery - a review.

Najoua Mokraï Benyahia1, Ann Verster1, Vera Saldien1, Margaretha Breebaart1, Luc Sermeus1, Marcel Vercauteren1.   

Abstract

The use of regional anaesthesia techniques for intra-operative anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia remains very controversial for patients scheduled to undergo spinal interventions. Spine surgeries, especially the most extensive types, are mostly performed under general anaesthesia. This has to be explained by the position required during surgery, the preference of the surgeon and/or anaesthesiologist and lack of sufficient literature supporting locoregional anaesthesia. In addition, there is an increasing trend to prefer general anaesthesia for spinal surgery. Nevertheless, with respect to spine surgeries more than 80% of the actual literature on neuraxial blocks is dated less than 12 years. The present overview was focused in the first place on the feasibility of (loco) regional techniques to be used intra-operatively. These techniques are also of interest for postoperative analgesia, either with a single bolus injection of local anaesthetics, opioids and adjuvants, alone or in combination, in continuous or intermittent administration and requiring the presence of foreign material in the neighborhood of the surgical field. As all techniques described offered variable success rates, future research is mandatory to determine their superiority over general intra-operative anaesthesia and conventional pain therapy with paracetamol, NSAIDs, opioids used alone or in combination.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anaesthesia; analgesia; regional; spine; surgery

Year:  2015        PMID: 28913452      PMCID: PMC5505328     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care        ISSN: 2392-7518


  74 in total

1.  Double epidural catheter with ropivacaine versus intravenous morphine: a comparison for postoperative analgesia after scoliosis correction surgery.

Authors:  Stephan Blumenthal; Kan Min; Marco Nadig; Alain Borgeat
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 2.  Beyond opioid patient-controlled analgesia: a systematic review of analgesia after major spine surgery.

Authors:  Sonal Sharma; Ravi K Balireddy; Kevin E Vorenkamp; Marcel E Durieux
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.288

3.  Postoperative analgesia after major spine surgery: patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia.

Authors:  Michael R Schenk; Michael Putzier; Bjoern Kügler; Stephan Tohtz; Kristina Voigt; Tania Schink; Wolfgang J Kox; Claudia Spies; Thomas Volk
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  A comparison of the effects of patient-controlled analgesia with intravenous opioids versus Epidural analgesia on recovery after surgery for idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  D H Van Boerum; J T Smith; M J Curtin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Continuous infusion of bupivacaine reduces postoperative morphine use in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after posterior spine fusion.

Authors:  Patrick A Ross; Brendan M Smith; Vernon T Tolo; Robinder G Khemani
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Effects of intraoperative-intrathecal sufentanil injection on postoperative pain management after single level lumbar discectomy.

Authors:  Saeid Abrishamkar; Mohammadhossein Karimi; Mohammadreza Safavi; Azim Honarmand; Afshin Safavi
Journal:  Middle East J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2010-10

7.  Epidural fentanyl for postoperative analgesia after lumbar canal decompression: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mathew R Guilfoyle; Richard J Mannion; Patrick Mitchell; Simon Thomson
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Opioid sparing effect of epidural levobupivacaine on postoperative pain treatment in major spinal surgery.

Authors:  A F Unterrainer; A R Al-Schameri; W P Piotrowski; M A Krombholz-Reindl; A L Schmid; W Hitzl
Journal:  Middle East J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2008-02

9.  Influence of baricity on the outcome of spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine for lumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  J E Tetzlaff; J O'Hara; G Bell; K Grimm; H J Yoon
Journal:  Reg Anesth       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec

10.  A comparison of three methods of pain control for posterior spinal fusions in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Todd A Milbrandt; Manuj Singhal; Christin Minter; Anna McClung; Vishwas R Talwalkar; Henry J Iwinski; Janet Walker; Claire Beimesch; Christopher Montgomery; Daniel J Sucato
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Efficacy of erector spinae block versus retrolaminar block for postoperative analgesia following posterior lumbar surgery].

Authors:  Tao Tao; Quan Zhou
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2019-06-30

2.  High-volume, multilevel local anesthetics-Epinephrine infiltration in kyphoscoliosis surgery: Intra and postoperative analgesia.

Authors:  Alaa Mazy; Mohamed Serry; Mohamed Kassem
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-04-10

3.  Regional Anesthesia for Lumbar Spine Surgery: Can It Be a Standard in the Future?

Authors:  Jae-Koo Lee; Jong Hwa Park; Seung-Jae Hyun; Daniel Hodel; Oliver N Hausmann
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2021-12-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.