| Literature DB >> 28913330 |
Lucky Sangal1, Sudhir Joshi1, Shalini Anandan2, Veeraraghavan Balaji2, Jaichand Johnson3, Asish Satapathy4, Pradeep Haldar5, Ramesh Rayru6, Srinath Ramamurthy7, Asha Raghavan8, Pankaj Bhatnagar1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: As part of national program, laboratory supported vaccine preventable diseases surveillance was initiated in Kerala in 2015. Mechanisms have been strengthened for case investigation, reporting, and data management. Specimens collected and sent to state and reference laboratories for confirmation and molecular surveillance. The major objective of this study is to understand the epidemiological information generated through surveillance system and its utilization for action.Entities:
Keywords: Corynebacterium diphtheriae; molecular surveillance; multi-locus sequence typing; outbreak; vaccine preventable diseases
Year: 2017 PMID: 28913330 PMCID: PMC5582196 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00218
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Real-time primers for the identification of C. diphtheriae.
| Target | Primer/probe | Sequence 5′–3′ | Amplicon length (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|
| dip_rpobF | CGT TCG CAA AGA TTA CGG AAC CA | 97 | |
| dip_rpobR | CAC TCA GGC GTA CCA ATC AAC | ||
| ulc_rpobF | TTC GCA TGG CTC ATT GGC AC | 98 | |
| Toxin | toxAF | CTT TTC TTC GTA CCA CGG GAC TAA | 117 |
The primer sequences used were previously reported (.
Figure 1Map showing location of diphtheria cases in Kerala state, India 2016 (n = 533).
Figure 2Epidemic curve of diphtheria cases in Malappuram, Kozhikode, and Kannur districts of Kerala, weeks 22–48; 2016 (n = 483).
Age and sex distribution of diphtheria cases in Kerala, India (weeks 20–48).
| Age group (in years) | Females | Males | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–5 | 12 | 23 | 35 |
| 5–10 | 39 | 54 | 93 |
| 10–18 | 58 | 103 | 161 |
| 18–45 | 135 | 63 | 198 |
| ≥45 | 29 | 10 | 39 |
| Total | 273 | 253 | 526 |
Vaccination status of diphtheria cases in Kerala, India (weeks 22–48) 2016 (n = 527).
| Doses of diphtheria containing vaccine | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age groups | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Total |
| 0–5 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 35 |
| 5–10 | 63 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 15 | 10 | 94 |
| 10–18 | 135 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 161 |
| 18–45 | 192 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 198 |
| >45 | 39 | 39 | |||||
.
Laboratory confirmation of C. diphtheriae isolates by culture, ELEK’s test, and real-time PCR for rpoB and tox-A gene.
| Centers | Specimen received | Isolate received | Culture positives | Elek’s test positives | Real-time PCR results | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | ||||||
| Thiruvananthapuram, State Public Health Laboratory | Isolate | 21 | 20 | 18 | 20 | 18 |
| Throat Swab | 69 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |
| Calicut, ASTER MIMS | Isolate | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Figure 3Phylogenetic tree including C. diphtheriae isolates from Kerala and reference strains from different parts of the world. The tree is represented by the isolate name followed by the sequence type.
Figure 4Global clonal relationship of the C. diphtheriae isolates predicted by eBURST analysis. Sequenced types observed in the Kerala outbreak were marked.