Literature DB >> 27902437

Development, validation and implementation of a quadruplex real-time PCR assay for identification of potentially toxigenic corynebacteria.

Aruni De Zoysa1, Androulla Efstratiou1, Ginder Mann1, Timothy G Harrison1, Norman K Fry1.   

Abstract

Toxigenic corynebacteria are uncommon in the UK; however, laboratory confirmation by the national reference laboratory can inform public health action according to national guidelines. Standard phenotypic tests for identification and toxin expression of isolates can take from ≥24 to ≥48 h from receipt. To decrease the time to result, a real-time PCR (qPCR) assay was developed for confirmation of both identification of Corynebacterium diphtheriae and Corynebacterium ulcerans/Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis and detection of the diphtheria toxin gene. Target genes were the RNA polymerase β-subunit-encoding gene (rpoB) and A-subunit of the diphtheria toxin gene (tox). Green fluorescent protein DNA (gfp) was used as an internal process control. qPCR results were obtained within 3 to 4 h after receipt of isolate. The assay was validated according to published guidelines and demonstrated high diagnostic sensitivity (100 %), high specificity (98-100 %) and positive and negative predictive values of 91 to 100 % and 100 %, respectively, compared to both block-based PCR and the Elek test, together with a greatly reduced time from isolate receipt to reporting. Limitations of the qPCR assay were the inability to distinguish between C. ulcerans and C. pseudotuberculosis and that the presence of the toxin gene as demonstrated by qPCR may not always predict toxin expression. Thus, confirmation of expression of diphtheria toxin is always sought using the phenotypic Elek test. The new qPCR assay was formally introduced as the front-line test for putative toxigenic corynebacteria to inform public health action in England and Wales on 1 April 2014.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27902437     DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.000382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Microbiol        ISSN: 0022-2615            Impact factor:   2.472


  12 in total

1.  Detection and Characterization of Diphtheria Toxin Gene-Bearing Corynebacterium Species through a New Real-Time PCR Assay.

Authors:  Margaret M Williams; Jessica L Waller; Janessa S Aneke; Michael R Weigand; Maureen H Diaz; Katherine E Bowden; Ashley K Simon; Yanhui Peng; Lingzi Xiaoli; Pamela K Cassiday; Jonas Winchell; M Lucia Tondella
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  A case of cutaneous toxigenic Corynebacterium ulcerans likely acquired from a domestic dog.

Authors:  Richard Othieno; Kate Mark; Michelle Etherson; Geoffrey Foster; Steven Murray; Pota Kalima; Norman K Fry; Claire Cameron; Jenni Strachan
Journal:  Access Microbiol       Date:  2019-05-30

3.  Validation of optimal reference genes for quantitative real time PCR in muscle and adipose tissue for obesity and diabetes research.

Authors:  Lester J Perez; Liliam Rios; Purvi Trivedi; Kenneth D'Souza; Andrew Cowie; Carine Nzirorera; Duncan Webster; Keith Brunt; Jean-Francois Legare; Ansar Hassan; Petra C Kienesberger; Thomas Pulinilkunnil
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Distinct Genomic Features Characterize Two Clades of Corynebacterium diphtheriae: Proposal of Corynebacterium diphtheriae Subsp. diphtheriae Subsp. nov. and Corynebacterium diphtheriae Subsp. lausannense Subsp. nov.

Authors:  Florian Tagini; Trestan Pillonel; Antony Croxatto; Claire Bertelli; Angela Koutsokera; Alban Lovis; Gilbert Greub
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Increase in detection of Corynebacterium diphtheriae in Canada: 2006-2019.

Authors:  K A Bernard; A L Pacheco; T Burdz; D Wiebe
Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep       Date:  2019-11-07

6.  Case Report: Toxigenic Corynebacterium ulcerans Diphtheria-Like Infection in a Horse in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Flavia Zendri; Cajsa Marie Isgren; Matthew Sinovich; Peter Richards-Rios; Katie L Hopkins; Katherine Russell; Natalie Groves; David Litt; Norman K Fry; Dorina Timofte
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-06-01

7.  Resurgence of Diphtheria in North Kerala, India, 2016: Laboratory Supported Case-Based Surveillance Outcomes.

Authors:  Lucky Sangal; Sudhir Joshi; Shalini Anandan; Veeraraghavan Balaji; Jaichand Johnson; Asish Satapathy; Pradeep Haldar; Ramesh Rayru; Srinath Ramamurthy; Asha Raghavan; Pankaj Bhatnagar
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-08-30

8.  Transmission of toxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae by a fully immunised resident returning from a visit to West Africa, United Kingdom, 2017.

Authors:  David Edwards; Dianne Kent; Caroline Lester; Colin Stewart Brown; Michael E Murphy; Nicholas M Brown; Olajumoke Sule; Alexandra Itani; Meera Chand; Amy Trindall; Callum Pearson; Iain Roddick; Norman K Fry; Jorg Hoffmann; Nalini Iyanger; Laurence Kemp; Joanne White; Babak Javid; Isobel D Ramsay; Dominik Zenner; Aliko Ahmed; Gayatri Amirthalingam; Sultan Salimee; David Litt; Mark Reacher
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2018-09

9.  Detection of toxin-producing Corynebacterium diphtheriae from throat swabs of diphtheria patients using duplex real-time PCR.

Authors:  Yeva Rosana; Luh Inta Prilandari; Ruhsyahadati Ajisman; Teguh Sarry Hartono; Andi Yasmon
Journal:  Iran J Microbiol       Date:  2020-12

10.  The changing epidemiology of diphtheria in the United Kingdom, 2009 to 2017.

Authors:  Charlotte M Gower; Antonia Scobie; Norman K Fry; David J Litt; J Claire Cameron; Meera A Chand; Colin S Brown; Sarah Collins; Joanne M White; Mary E Ramsay; Gayatri Amirthalingam
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2020-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.