Literature DB >> 28913156

Head and neck PET/CT therapy response interpretation criteria (Hopkins criteria) - external validation study.

Ayse Tuba Kendi1,2, David Brandon2, Jeffrey Switchenko3, Jeffery Trad Wadsworth4, Mark W El-Deiry4, Nabil F Saba5, David M Schuster2, Rathan M Subramaniam6,7.   

Abstract

Qualitative assessment of PET/CT results in post therapy is very important to provide a reproducible and systemic reporting. A recently introduced response criteria, known as the Hopkins criteria showed promising results. Our aim is to externally validate the Hopkins interpretation system to assess therapy response in head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC). The study included 69 biopsy proven HNSCC patients who underwent post therapy PET/CT between 5-24 weeks after completion of therapy. PET/CT images were interpreted by one nuclear medicine physician and one nuclear radiologist, independently. The studies were scored according to the Hopkins criteria for right neck, left neck, primary tumor site, and overall assessment. Scores 1, 2, 3 were considered as negative and scores 4 and 5 were considered as positive for tumors. Inter-reader variability was assessed using percent agreement and Kappa statistics. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Of the 69 patients, 59 (85.5%) were males, with a mean age of 62.8 years. The percent agreement between readers for overall, right neck, left neck, and primary tumor site were 91.3%, 97.6%, 97.6%, 91.3% respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the overall therapy assessment were 66.7%, 87.3%, 33%, 96.5% respectively. Cox univariate regression analysis showed positive primary tumor site scores and overall scores were associated with a higher risk of progression (p<0.05). External validation of Hopkins criteria showed excellent inter-reader agreement and prediction of PFS in HNSCC patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Head and neck carcinoma; Hopkins criteria; PET/CT

Year:  2017        PMID: 28913156      PMCID: PMC5596320     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging


  15 in total

1.  Results of a prospective study of positron emission tomography-directed management of residual nodal abnormalities in node-positive head and neck cancer after definitive radiotherapy with or without systemic therapy.

Authors:  Sandro V Porceddu; David I Pryor; Elizabeth Burmeister; Bryan H Burmeister; Michael G Poulsen; Matthew C Foote; Benedict Panizza; Scott Coman; David McFarlane; William Coman
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.147

2.  Qualitative interpretation of PET scans using a Likert scale to assess neck node response to radiotherapy in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Johanna Sjövall; Ulrika Bitzén; Elisabeth Kjellén; Per Nilsson; Peter Wahlberg; Eva Brun
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Implementation of a Novel Surveillance Template for Head and Neck Cancer: Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NI-RADS).

Authors:  Ashley H Aiken; April Farley; Kristen L Baugnon; Amanda Corey; Mark El-Deiry; Richard Duszak; Jonathan Beitler; Patricia A Hudgins
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Response assessment by combined PET-CT scan versus CT scan alone using RECIST in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  V A Passero; B F Branstetter; Y Shuai; D E Heron; M K Gibson; S Y Lai; S W Kim; J R Grandis; R L Ferris; J T Johnson; A Argiris
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  The role of positron emission tomography/CT imaging in head and neck cancer patients after radical chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  J M Sherriff; B Ogunremi; S Colley; P Sanghera; A Hartley
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Gender and ethnic disparities in incidence and survival of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue, base of tongue, and tonsils: a surveillance, epidemiology and end results program-based analysis.

Authors:  Nabil F Saba; Michael Goodman; Kevin Ward; Chris Flowers; Suresh Ramalingam; Taofeek Owonikoko; Amy Chen; William Grist; Trad Wadsworth; Jonathan J Beitler; Fadlo R Khuri; Dong M Shin
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 2.935

7.  Long-term results of positron emission tomography-directed management of the neck in node-positive head and neck cancer after organ preservation therapy.

Authors:  Johanna Sjövall; Benjamin Chua; David Pryor; Elizabeth Burmeister; Matthew C Foote; Benedict Panizza; Bryan H Burmeister; Sandro V Porceddu
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 5.337

8.  Head and neck PET/CT: therapy response interpretation criteria (Hopkins Criteria)-interreader reliability, accuracy, and survival outcomes.

Authors:  Charles Marcus; Anthony Ciarallo; Abdel K Tahari; Esther Mena; Wayne Koch; Richard L Wahl; Ana P Kiess; Hyunseok Kang; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  18F-FDG PET as a routine posttreatment surveillance tool in oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study.

Authors:  Christiaan A Krabbe; Jan Pruim; Pieter U Dijkstra; Hans Balink; Bernard F van der Laan; Jan G de Visscher; Jan L Roodenburg
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Revisiting the role of positron-emission tomography/computed tomography in determining the need for planned neck dissection following chemoradiation for advanced head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Christine G Gourin; Brian J Boyce; Hadyn T Williams; Anne V Herdman; Paul A Bilodeau; Teresa A Coleman
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  4 in total

1.  Discordance Between Oncology Clinician-Perceived and Radiologist-Intended Meaning of the Postradiotherapy Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Freeform Report for Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Zachary Patel; Jennifer A Schroeder; Paul M Bunch; Joni K Evans; Cole R Steber; Adam G Johnson; Joshua C Farris; Ryan T Hughes
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 8.961

2.  Hopkins criteria for residual disease assessment after definitive radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Wen Long; Guannan Wang; Yuxiang Yang; Biaoshui Liu; Wei Fan
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 3.  RESISTing the Need to Quantify: Putting Qualitative FDG-PET/CT Tumor Response Assessment Criteria into Daily Practice.

Authors:  J G Peacock; C T Christensen; K P Banks
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 4.966

4.  Does a 6-point scale approach to post-treatment 18F-FDG PET-CT allow to improve response assessment in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma? A multicenter study.

Authors:  P Bonomo; A Merlotti; S Morbelli; V Berti; C Saieva; F Bergesio; A Bacigalupo; L Belgioia; C Franzese; E Lopci; A Casolo; E D'Angelo; D Alterio; L Travaini; L Berretta; V Pirro; S Ursino; D Volterrani; M Roncali; F Vigo; S Cicchetti; F Scalone; G Belli; S Cauda; I Desideri; E Russi; L Livi; A Bianchi
Journal:  Eur J Hybrid Imaging       Date:  2020-05-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.