Literature DB >> 28912917

The Low-Dose (7.5 mg/day) Pioglitazone Therapy.

Hidekatsu Yanai1, Hiroki Adachi1.   

Abstract

Pioglitazone is one of thiazolidinedione derivatives, which stimulates nuclear peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and improves glucose and lipid metabolism and insulin sensitivity. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis showed that pioglitazone therapy was associated with a lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with pre-diabetes and diabetes. Further, in a cohort study of patients with type 2 diabetes, pioglitazone therapy was associated with a statistically significant decrease in the risk of all-cause mortality. Despite these beneficial effects, the meta-analysis showed that pioglitazone therapy had higher risks of heart failure, bone fractures, edema and weight gain. To find out the efficacy and safety of the low-dose (7.5 mg/day) pioglitazone therapy, we reviewed the dose-response of pioglitazone on favorable effects and adverse effects due to pioglitazone, by searching the reports on effects of daily dose of 7.5 mg and/or 15 mg and/or 30 mg of pioglitazone. The low-dose pioglitazone therapy may show the same degree of improvements in glucose and lipid metabolism, fatty liver, insulin resistance, and adiponectin as the standard- and high-dose pioglitazone therapy. Furthermore, the low-dose pioglitazone therapy may also show less adverse effects on weight gain, edema and heart failure as compared with the standard- and high-dose pioglitazone therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body weight; Hear failure; Lipid metabolism; Liver function; Pioglitazone

Year:  2017        PMID: 28912917      PMCID: PMC5593428          DOI: 10.14740/jocmr3144w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med Res        ISSN: 1918-3003


Introduction

Pioglitazone is one of thiazolidinedione derivatives, which stimulates nuclear peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) and improves insulin sensitivity by acting on adipose tissue, muscle and liver [1, 2]. Pioglitazone improves serum lipids in addition to glucose-lowering [3]. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis showed that pioglitazone therapy was associated with a lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with pre-diabetes or insulin resistance (-23%), and diabetes (-17%) [4]. Another meta-analysis demonstrated that pioglitazone therapy in stroke patients with insulin resistance, pre-diabetes, and diabetes was associated with lower risk of recurrent stroke (-32%) and future major vascular events (-25%) [5]. Further, in a European multi-database cohort study of patients with type 2 diabetes, pioglitazone therapy was associated with a statistically significant decrease in the risk of all-cause mortality [6]. Despite these beneficial effects, pioglitazone therapy had higher risks of heart failure (+32%), bone fractures (+52%), edema (+63%) and weight gain (+60%) in the meta-analysis [4]. We previously reported that the low-dose (7.5 mg/day) pioglitazone therapy is beneficial to the improvement in metabolic parameters without weight gain and an increase of risk for heart failure [7]. To find out the efficacy and safety of the low-dose pioglitazone therapy, we reviewed the dose-response of pioglitazone on favorable effects and adverse effects due to pioglitazone, by searching the reports on effects of daily dose of 7.5 mg and/or 15 mg and/or 30 mg of pioglitazone.

Effects of Low-, Standard- and High-Dose Pioglitazone Therapy on Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone

Effects of low- (7.5 mg/day), standard- (15 mg/day) and high-dose (30 mg/day) pioglitazone therapy on efficacy- and safety-related parameters due to pioglitazone were shown in Table 1 [7-10].
Table 1

Effects of Low- (7.5 mg/day), Standard- (15 mg/day) and High-Dose (30 mg/day) Pioglitazone on Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone

AuthorDuration of treatment7.5 mg15 mg30 mg
Rajagopalan et al [8]12 weeksEfficacyHbA1c (%)-0.5**-0.6**-0.7**
FPG (mg/dL)-30.6**-40.3**-41.1**
PPG (mg/dL)-48.3**-53.3**-54.6**
C-peptide (ng/mL)-0.4**-0.4**-0.8**
Adiponectin (µg/dL)+10.6**+11.3**+12.1**
Triglyceride (mg/dL)-19.6**-18.1**-24.1**
HDL-C (mg/dL)+3.3**+3.2**+4.2**
SafetyBody weight (kg)+0.2+0.9**+1.9**
BMI (kg/m2)+0.1+0.3**+0.8**
Body fat (%)+0.1+0.8**+1.2**
Majima et al [9]6 monthsEfficacyHbA1c (%)-0.61**-0.69**
FPG (mg/dL)-23.91**-27.87**
IRI (µU/mL)-0.71**-0.69**
Triglyceride (mg/dL)-21.32**-26.93**
HDL-C (mg/dL)+3.53**+4.55**
SafetyBody weight (kg)+1.14+2.79
Body fat (%)+1.97+4.75
Edema2/54 (3.7%)11/41 (26.8%)
Panikar et al [10]6 monthsEfficacyHbA1c (%)
SafetyBody weight (kg)+0.88**+1.62**+2.72**
Adachi et al [7]2 monthsEfficacyHbA1c (%)-0.8*-0.7*
ALT (U/mL)-6.8*-4.5
SafetyBody weight (kg)-1.0+0.9
BNP (pg/mL)+0.8+12.1*

ALT: alanine aminotransferase; BMI: body mass index; BNP: B-type natriuretic peptide; FPG: fasting plasma glucose; IRI: immunoreactive insulin; PPG: postprandial plasma glucose. *P < 0.1 and **P < 0.05 vs. baseline, respectively.

ALT: alanine aminotransferase; BMI: body mass index; BNP: B-type natriuretic peptide; FPG: fasting plasma glucose; IRI: immunoreactive insulin; PPG: postprandial plasma glucose. *P < 0.1 and **P < 0.05 vs. baseline, respectively. In the study by Rajagopalan et al, all three groups showed a significant reduction in HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) [8]. However, there was no significant difference in HbA1c reduction among three groups. Dose dependency could not be obtained for reduction of HbA1c (r = 0.09; P = 0.42), FPG (r = 0.114; P = 0.175) and PPG (r = 0.06; P = 0.58) [8]. There was a significant reduction in triglyceride and C-peptide and a significant elevation in adiponectin and HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C). However, a significant difference among three groups was not obtained in any laboratory parameters. Adiponectin is a serum protein secreted by adipocytes and suppresses pro-inflammatory state which is observed in the metabolic syndrome including insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, hypertension, and dyslipidemia [11]. Pioglitazone may increase adiponectin concentrations in patients with type 2 diabetes independently of improvements in blood glucose [11]. The low-dose pioglitazone therapy seems to improve dyslipidemia, insulin resistance and increase adiponectin which is one of the most important therapeutic targets of pioglitazone as well as the standard- and high-dose pioglitazone therapy. Aso et al also reported that the low-dose pioglitazone (7.5 mg/day) therapy increases serum high molecular weight adiponectin and improves glycemic control in Japanese patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes [12]. Vu et al reported that the low-dose pioglitazone (7.5 mg/day) therapy increases serum high molecular weight adiponectin and improves glycemic control in patients with the metabolic syndrome without type 2 diabetes [13]. The standard and high dose of pioglitazone showed a significant increase in body weight, body mass index (BMI) and body fat, which was not observed in the low-dose pioglitazone group [8]. The low-dose pioglitazone therapy is more favorable for body weight and body fat as compared with the standard- and high-dose pioglitazone therapy. Majima et al compared the effects of low-dose pioglitazone (7.5 mg/day) with those of standard-dose pioglitazone (15 mg/day) in Japanese women with type 2 diabetes [9]. Both groups showed a significant reduction in HbA1c, FPG, immunoreactive insulin (IRI) and triglyceride, and also showed a significant elevation of HDL-C; however, none of the intergroup differences reached statistical significance [9]. However, in terms of safety, % change of body weight during the 6-month treatment in the low-dose pioglitazone group was significantly less than that in the standard-dose pioglitazone group (P < 0.0001). The study by Majima et al almost supported the result of the study by Rajagopalan et al. Twice as many patients reported edema with pioglitazone than with gliclazide in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group comparison trial [14]. In the kidney, PPARγ is most abundant in the collecting duct. Thiazolidinediones has been reported to expand body fluid volume through PPARγ stimulation of the epithelial Na+ channel-mediated renal salt absorption [15]. Majima et al also showed that the incidence of peripheral edema was significantly much lower in the low-dose pioglitazone group (3.7%) than in the standard-dose pioglitazone group (26.8%) (P = 0.0014). Further, their study showed that the low-dose pioglitazone therapy was more favorable for peripheral edema as compared with the standard-dose pioglitazone therapy. Panikar et al studied the effect of low (7.5 mg/day), standard (15 mg/day) and high (30 mg/day) dose of pioglitazone on glycemic control and weight gain in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes [10]. At the end of 6 months, there was significant weight gain in all three groups from baseline (P < 0.01). Weight gain was greatest in the high-dose pioglitazone group, intermediate in the standard-dose pioglitazone group and least in the low-dose pioglitazone group. The difference was statistically significant between the low-dose pioglitazone group and the high-dose pioglitazone group, and the standard-dose pioglitazone group and the high-dose pioglitazone group, but not between the low-dose pioglitazone group and the standard-dose pioglitazone group. There was no significant difference in HbA1c reduction between the three groups. The dose was significantly correlated with weight gain (r = 0.254; P < 0.001), suggesting the dose-dependent effect of pioglitazone on body weight gain. Pioglitazone has an adverse effect of edema that may result in subsequent heart failure, especially in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease [16-18]. We previously studied the effects of pioglitazone on plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) which is a sensitive biomarker for diagnosing heart failure [19]. We compared the data before the start of pioglitazone with the data at almost 2 months (mean, 52.6 days) after the start of pioglitazone [7]. Body weight showed a non-significant decrease in the daily 7.5 mg pioglitazone-treated group, and showed a non-significant increase in the daily 15 mg pioglitazone-treated group. HbA1c tended to decrease in both groups. Plasma BNP did not change in the daily 7.5 mg pioglitazone-treated group; however, plasma BNP tended to increase in the daily 15 mg pioglitazone-treated group. Our study demonstrated that the daily 7.5 mg pioglitazone-treatment improved HbA1c without increase of body weight and plasma BNP as compared with the daily 15 mg pioglitazone-treatment [7]. The treatment with thiazolidinediones such as pioglitazone reduces hepatocellular lipid levels by 30-50% by modulating insulin sensitivity and endocrine function of adipose tissue in type 2 diabetes [20]. The administration of pioglitazone was reported to reduce steatosis and inflammation in liver in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and type 2 diabetes [21, 22]. In our study, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) tended to decrease in only the daily 7.5 mg pioglitazone-treated group [7].

The Influences of Withdrawal and Daily Dose Reduction of Pioglitazone on Metabolic Parameters in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

To understand the influences of withdrawal or dose reduction of pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes, we retrospectively picked up patients who had undergone withdrawal or daily dose reduction of pioglitazone after a continuous prescription for 3 months or longer, and compared the data before the withdrawal or dose reduction of pioglitazone with the data at 3 or 6 months [23]. In patients who had undergone daily dose reduction, the mean dose of pioglitazone was 29.6 mg at baseline, 11.9 mg at 3 months, and 11.7 mg at 6 months after the dose reduction. The number of subjects who had taken high-dose metformin (≥ 1,000 mg) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors increased after the withdrawal or dose reduction of pioglitazone in both groups. Although no significant change was observed in plasma glucose and HbA1c levels, body weight significantly decreased at 3 and 6 months after the dose reduction, suggesting the dose-dependent effect of pioglitazone on body weight gain and also supporting the usefulness of the low-dose pioglitazone therapy.

The Dose-Dependent Effect of Pioglitazone on Other Safety-Related Parameters

A population-based cohort study from France showed that pioglitazone exposure was significantly associated with increased risk of bladder cancer [24]. In this study, a significantly increased risk for high cumulative doses of pioglitazone (≥ 28,000 mg, adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 1.75 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.22 - 2.50)) and long duration of exposure (≥ 24 months, adjusted HR: 1.36 (1.04 - 1.79)) was observed [24]. Although controversial discussions exist about the association between pioglitazone and bladder cancer, the low-dose pioglitazone therapy may be beneficial to reduce the risk of bladder cancer. In the nested case-control analysis using the UK General Practice Research Database, a possible association between long-term use of thiazolidinediones and fractures was observed in patients with diabetes mellitus [25]. A meta-analysis reported that pioglitazone was associated with a significantly increased risk of fractures overall in the 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (odds ratio (OR): 1.45, 95% CI: 1.18 - 1.79; P < 0.001) [26]. Five RCTs showed a significantly increased risk of fractures among women (OR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.65 - 3.01; P < 0.001). Bone mineral density in women exposed to thiazolidinediones was significantly reduced at the lumbar spine and hip in two RCTs [26]. At the moment, the dose-dependent effect of pioglitazone on bone fractures remains unknown.

Conclusion

The summary about efficacy and safety of the low dose (7.5 mg/day) pioglitazone therapy was shown in Figure 1. The low-dose pioglitazone therapy may show the same degree of effects on improvements in glucose and lipid metabolism, fatty liver, insulin resistance and adiponectin as the standard- and high-dose pioglitazone therapy. Furthermore, the low-dose pioglitazone therapy may also show less adverse effects on weight gain, edema and heart failure as compared with the standard- and high-dose pioglitazone therapy. At this moment, the dose-dependent effect of pioglitazone on bone fractures remains unknown.
Figure 1

Efficacy and safety of the low-dose (7.5 mg/day) pioglitazone therapy. Low dose of pioglitazone could improve the efficacy and safety, but reduce the side effect to the minimum, suggesting that low dose might be the optimal dose. Briefly, the low-dose pioglitazone therapy may show the same degree of improvements in glucose and lipid metabolism, fatty liver, insulin resistance, and adiponectin as the standard- and high-dose pioglitazone therapy. Furthermore, the low-dose pioglitazone therapy may also show less adverse effects on weight gain, edema and heart failure as compared with the standard- and high-dose pioglitazone therapy.

Efficacy and safety of the low-dose (7.5 mg/day) pioglitazone therapy. Low dose of pioglitazone could improve the efficacy and safety, but reduce the side effect to the minimum, suggesting that low dose might be the optimal dose. Briefly, the low-dose pioglitazone therapy may show the same degree of improvements in glucose and lipid metabolism, fatty liver, insulin resistance, and adiponectin as the standard- and high-dose pioglitazone therapy. Furthermore, the low-dose pioglitazone therapy may also show less adverse effects on weight gain, edema and heart failure as compared with the standard- and high-dose pioglitazone therapy.
  26 in total

Review 1.  Thiazolidinediones.

Authors:  Hannele Yki-Järvinen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-09-09       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Mechanisms of Disease: hepatic steatosis in type 2 diabetes--pathogenesis and clinical relevance.

Authors:  Michael Roden
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2006-06

Review 3.  Biological background and role of adiponectin as marker for insulin resistance and cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  Thomas Schöndorf; Agnes Maiworm; Neil Emmison; Thomas Forst; Andreas Pfützner
Journal:  Clin Lab       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.138

4.  A long-term comparison of pioglitazone and gliclazide in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group comparison trial.

Authors:  B H Charbonnel; D R Matthews; G Schernthaner; M Hanefeld; P Brunetti
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.359

5.  Safety and efficacy of low-dose pioglitazone (7.5 mg/day) vs. standard-dose pioglitazone (15 mg/day) in Japanese women with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Takafumi Majima; Yasato Komatsu; Kentaro Doi; Michika Shigemoto; Chieko Takagi; Atsushi Fukao; Jerry Corners; Kazuwa Nakao
Journal:  Endocr J       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 2.349

6.  A comparison of lipid and glycemic effects of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia.

Authors:  Ronald B Goldberg; David M Kendall; Mark A Deeg; John B Buse; Anthony J Zagar; Jane A Pinaire; Meng H Tan; Mehmood A Khan; Alfonso T Perez; Scott J Jacober
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Long-term use of thiazolidinediones and fractures in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yoon K Loke; Sonal Singh; Curt D Furberg
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Pharmacodynamic Effects of Low-Dose Pioglitazone in Patients with the Metabolic Syndrome without Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Anh Vu; Lisa A Kosmiski; Amber L Beitelshees; Ronald Prigeon; Maha S Sidhom; Brooke Bredbeck; Julie Predhomme; Kimberly M Deininger; Christina L Aquilante
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 4.705

9.  Pioglitazone and risk of bladder cancer among diabetic patients in France: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  A Neumann; A Weill; P Ricordeau; J P Fagot; F Alla; H Allemand
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 10.  Pioglitazone and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with insulin resistance, pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hung-Wei Liao; Jeffrey L Saver; Yi-Ling Wu; Tso-Hsiao Chen; Meng Lee; Bruce Ovbiagele
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Anti-Diabetic Drugs: Cure or Risk Factors for Cancer?

Authors:  Jeny Laskar; Kasturi Bhattacharjee; Mahuya Sengupta; Yashmin Choudhury
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 2.  Therapy to Obese Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: How Far Will We Go Down the Wrong Road?

Authors:  Xian-Pei Heng; Xiu-Jun Li; Liang Li; Liu-Qing Yang; Zi-Ta Wang; Su-Ping Huang
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 1.978

Review 3.  Beneficial Effects of Adiponectin on Glucose and Lipid Metabolism and Atherosclerotic Progression: Mechanisms and Perspectives.

Authors:  Hidekatsu Yanai; Hiroshi Yoshida
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone Monotherapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Fahmida Alam; Md Asiful Islam; Mafauzy Mohamed; Imran Ahmad; Mohammad Amjad Kamal; Richard Donnelly; Iskandar Idris; Siew Hua Gan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease and pioglitazone for its therapy: a comprehensive review with an emphasis on the molecular pathogenesis and pharmacological aspects.

Authors:  Aryendu Kumar Saini; Rakesh Saini; Shubham Singh
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 6.354

6.  Pioglitazone in diabetic kidney disease: forgotten but not gone.

Authors:  Georgios S Papaetis
Journal:  Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis       Date:  2022-08-08

7.  A double-blind, Randomized controlled trial on glucose-lowering EFfects and safety of adding 0.25 or 0.5 mg lobeglitazone in type 2 diabetes patients with INadequate control on metformin and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor therapy: REFIND study.

Authors:  Soree Ryang; Sang Soo Kim; Ji Cheol Bae; Ji Min Han; Su Kyoung Kwon; Young Il Kim; Il Seong Nam-Goong; Eun Sook Kim; Mi-Kyung Kim; Chang Won Lee; Soyeon Yoo; Gwanpyo Koh; Min Jeong Kwon; Jeong Hyun Park; In Joo Kim
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 6.408

8.  Antifibrotic Effects of the Thiazolidinediones in Eosinophilic Esophagitis Pathologic Remodeling: A Preclinical Evaluation.

Authors:  Quan M Nhu; Lance Hsieh; Lucas Dohil; Ranjan Dohil; Robert O Newbury; Richard Kurten; Fouad J Moawad; Seema S Aceves
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 9.  New methods to image unstable atherosclerotic plaques.

Authors:  Jack P M Andrews; Zahi A Fayad; Marc R Dweck
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 5.162

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.