Literature DB >> 15983299

A comparison of lipid and glycemic effects of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia.

Ronald B Goldberg1, David M Kendall, Mark A Deeg, John B Buse, Anthony J Zagar, Jane A Pinaire, Meng H Tan, Mehmood A Khan, Alfonso T Perez, Scott J Jacober.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Published reports suggest that pioglitazone and rosiglitazone have different effects on lipids in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, these previous studies were either retrospective chart reviews or clinical trials not rigorously controlled for concomitant glucose- and lipid-lowering therapies. This study examines the lipid and glycemic effects of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We enrolled subjects with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (treated with diet alone or oral monotherapy) and dyslipidemia (not treated with any lipid-lowering agents). After a 4-week placebo washout period, subjects randomly assigned to the pioglitazone arm (n = 400) were treated with 30 mg once daily for 12 weeks followed by 45 mg once daily for an additional 12 weeks, whereas subjects randomly assigned to rosiglitazone (n = 402) were treated with 4 mg once daily followed by 4 mg twice daily for the same intervals.
RESULTS: Triglyceride levels were reduced by 51.9 +/- 7.8 mg/dl with pioglitazone, but were increased by 13.1 +/- 7.8 mg/dl with rosiglitazone (P < 0.001 between treatments). Additionally, the increase in HDL cholesterol was greater (5.2 +/- 0.5 vs. 2.4 +/- 0.5 mg/dl; P < 0.001) and the increase in LDL cholesterol was less (12.3 +/- 1.6 vs. 21.3 +/- 1.6 mg/dl; P < 0.001) for pioglitazone compared with rosiglitazone, respectively. LDL particle concentration was reduced with pioglitazone and increased with rosiglitazone (P < 0.001). LDL particle size increased more with pioglitazone (P = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Pioglitazone and rosiglitazone have significantly different effects on plasma lipids independent of glycemic control or concomitant lipid-lowering or other antihyperglycemic therapy. Pioglitazone compared with rosiglitazone is associated with significant improvements in triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, LDL particle concentration, and LDL particle size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15983299     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.28.7.1547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  193 in total

1.  Clinical applications of advanced lipoprotein testing in diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Danyaal S Moin; Anand Rohatgi
Journal:  Clin Lipidol       Date:  2011-08-01

Review 2.  Pioglitazone: a review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  John Waugh; Gillian M Keating; Greg L Plosker; Stephanie Easthope; Dean M Robinson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  The PROACTIVE Study and reduction of cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Michael H Davidson
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.113

4.  Combining beta-adrenergic and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma stimulation improves lipoprotein composition in healthy moderately obese subjects.

Authors:  Thomas A Hughes; Frankie Stentz; Thomas Gettys; Steven R Smith
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 8.694

5.  Relationship between thiazolidinedione use and cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality among patients with diabetes: a time-updated propensity analysis.

Authors:  Zeina A Habib; Leonidas Tzogias; Suzanne L Havstad; Karen Wells; George Divine; David E Lanfear; Jeffrey Tang; Richard Krajenta; Manel Pladevall; L Keoki Williams
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.890

Review 6.  Insulin Resistance and Atherosclerosis: Implications for Insulin-Sensitizing Agents.

Authors:  Antonino Di Pino; Ralph A DeFronzo
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 7.  Are thiazolidinediones good or bad for the heart?

Authors:  Angela M Taylor; Coleen A McNamara
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 8.  Cardiovascular effects of anti-diabetic medications in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Samar Singh; Jyoti Bhat; Ping H Wang
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 9.  Glycemic management in patients with coronary artery disease and prediabetes or type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Allison B Goldfine; Eng-Joo Phua; Martin J Abrahamson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 10.  A review of the efficacy and safety of oral antidiabetic drugs.

Authors:  Stephanie Aleskow Stein; Elizabeth Mary Lamos; Stephen N Davis
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Saf       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.250

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.