Literature DB >> 28912006

Predictors of late aortic intervention in patients with medically treated type B aortic dissection.

Samuel I Schwartz1, Christopher Durham1, W Darrin Clouse1, Virendra I Patel1, R Todd Lancaster1, Richard P Cambria1, Mark F Conrad2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with medically managed type B aortic dissection (TBAD) have a high incidence of aorta-related complications over time. Whereas early thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) to seal the entry tear can promote aortic remodeling and prevent late aneurysm formation, there are sparse data as to which patients will benefit from such therapy. The goal of this study was to identify clinical and anatomic factors that are associated with the need for subsequent aortic intervention in patients who present with uncomplicated TBAD. These factors could guide the selection of patients who will benefit from TEVAR in the subacute phase.
METHODS: Patients who presented with acute uncomplicated TBAD and were initially managed medically from January 2000 to December 2013 were included in the study. Timing of intervention was stratified into early (within 180 days of initial presentation) and late (181 days and later) cohorts. All patients had follow-up axial imaging studies. These imaging studies were reviewed for anatomic criteria in a retrospective fashion. Predictors of aortic intervention were determined using Cox regression analyses.
RESULTS: There were 254 patients (65% men) with medically managed acute TBAD. The average age at presentation was 66.3 years, and 82.5% had a history of hypertension. Mean follow-up was 6.8 years (range, 0.1-13.6 years). There were a total of 97 (38%) patients who required an aortic intervention during follow-up; 30 (12%) patients required an early intervention, and 67 (26%) were treated during late follow-up (100% for aneurysmal degeneration). Predictors of late aortic intervention included entry tear >10 mm (odds ratio [OR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-3.8; P = .03), total aortic diameter >40 mm at time of presentation (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.8-4.3; P = .02), false lumen diameter >20 mm (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-4.7; P = .03), and increase in total aortic diameter >5 mm between serial imaging studies (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.3-3.5; P = .02). Complete thrombosis of the false lumen was protective against late operative intervention (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.11-0.48; P < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 40% of patients who present with an uncomplicated TBAD will ultimately require an aortic intervention. All of the late interventions were performed for aneurysmal degeneration. A variety of readily available anatomic features can predict the need for eventual operative intervention in TBAD; accordingly, these parameters can guide the desirability of early TEVAR.
Copyright © 2017 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28912006     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.05.128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  10 in total

1.  The impact of thoracic endovascular aortic repair on long-term survival in type B aortic dissection.

Authors:  Christos D Karkos; Ignacio Hernandez-Lahoz; Nikolaos Asaloumidis; Konstantinos O Papazoglou
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-12

2.  Simple Death Risk Models to Predict In-hospital Outcomes in Acute Aortic Dissection in Emergency Department.

Authors:  Lingyu Xing; Yannan Zhou; Yi Han; Chen Chen; Zegang Dong; Xinde Zheng; Dongxu Chen; Yao Yu; Fengqing Liao; Shuai Guo; Chenling Yao; Min Tang; Guorong Gu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-23

3.  Acute or Subacute, the Optimal Timing for Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Xi-Hao Zhang; Zuo-Guan Chen; Yong-Peng Diao; Zhi-Yuan Wu; Yong-Jun Li
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-03

4.  Predictors of Failure of Medical Management in Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection.

Authors:  Xiaoying Lou; Yazan M Duwayri; Edward P Chen; William D Jordan; Jessica Forcillo; Carl A Zehner; Bradley G Leshnower
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  False lumen pressure estimation in type B aortic dissection using 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparisons with aortic growth.

Authors:  David Marlevi; Julio A Sotelo; Ross Grogan-Kaylor; Yunus Ahmed; Sergio Uribe; Himanshu J Patel; Elazer R Edelman; David A Nordsletten; Nicholas S Burris
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.364

6.  Geometric Analysis of Type B Aortic Dissections Shows Aortic Remodeling After Intervention Using Multilayer Stents.

Authors:  Victor S Costache; Jorn P Meekel; Andreea Costache; Tatiana Melnic; Crina Solomon; Anca M Chitic; Cristian Bucurenciu; Horatiu Moldovan; Iulian Antoniac; Gabriela Candea; Kak K Yeung
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  How should we treat uncomplicated subacute type B aortic dissection in octogenarians?

Authors:  Ken Nakamura; Tetsuro Uchida; Azumi Hamasaki; Mitsuaki Sadahiro
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 1.637

8.  4D flow MRI of type B dissection with later retrograde progression to type A dissection in Marfan: a case report.

Authors:  Max J P van Hout; Joe F Juffermans; Arthur J Scholte; Hildo J Lamb
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2021-08-27

9.  Open repair remains the gold standard.

Authors:  Jonathan C Hong; Joseph S Coselli
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-01-26

10.  One-Year Single-Center Results of the Multilayer Flow Modulator Stents for the Treatment of Type B Aortic Dissection.

Authors:  Victor S Costache; Jorn P Meekel; Andreea Costache; Tatiana Melnic; Cristian Bucurenciu; Anca Chitic; Gabriela Candea; Crina Solomon; Kak K Yeung
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.487

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.