Literature DB >> 28906244

Hearing Aid Use and Mild Hearing Impairment: Learnings from Big Data.

Barbra H B Timmer1, Louise Hickson1, Stefan Launer1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous research, mostly reliant on self-reports, has indicated that hearing aid (HA) use is related to the degree of hearing impairment (HI). No large-scale investigation of the relationship between data-logged HA use and HI has been conducted to date.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate if objective measures of overall daily HA use and HA use in various listening environments are different for adults with mild HI compared to adults with moderate HI. RESEARCH
DESIGN: This retrospective study used data extracted from a database of fitting appointments from an international group of HA providers. Only data from the participants' most recent fitting appointment were included in the final dataset. STUDY SAMPLE: A total of 8,489 bilateral HA fittings of adults over the age of 18 yr, conducted between January 2013 and June 2014, were included. Participants were subsequently allocated to HI groups, based on British Society of Audiology and American Speech-Language-Hearing Association audiometric descriptors. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Fitting data from participating HA providers were regularly transferred to a central server. The data, with all personal information except age and gender removed, contained participants' four-frequency average (at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz) as well as information on HA characteristics and usage. Following data cleaning, bivariate and post hoc statistical analyses were conducted.
RESULTS: The total sample of adults' average daily HA use was 8.52 hr (interquartile range [IQR] = 5.49-11.77) in the left ear and 8.51 hr (IQR = 5.49-11.72) in the right ear. With a few exceptions, there were no statistical differences between hours of HA use for participants with mild HI compared to those with moderate impairment. Across all mild and moderate HI groups, the most common overall HA usage was between 8 and 12 hr per day. Other factors such as age, gender, and HA style also showed no relationship to hours of use. HAs were used, on average, for 7 hr (IQR = 4.27-9.96) per day in quiet and 1 hr (IQR = 0.33-1.41) per day in noisy listening situations.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical populations with mild HI use HAs as frequently as those with a moderate HI. These findings support the recommendation of HAs for adults with milder degrees of HI. American Academy of Audiology

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28906244     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.16104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  10 in total

Review 1.  Benefits from, Satisfaction with, and Self-Efficacy for Advanced Digital Hearing Aids in Users with Mild Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Carole E Johnson; Anna Marie Jilla; Jeffrey L Danhauer; J Connor Sullivan; Kristin R Sanchez
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-06-15

2.  Big Data for Sound Policies: Toward Evidence-Informed Hearing Health Policies.

Authors:  Johanna Gutenberg; Panagiotis Katrakazas; Lyubov Trenkova; Louisa Murdin; Dario Brdaric; Nina Koloutsou; Katherine Ploumidou; Niels Henrik Pontoppidan; Ariane Laplante-Lévesque
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 1.493

3.  Longitudinal Changes in Hearing Aid Use and Hearing Aid Management Challenges in Infants.

Authors:  Anisa Sadru Visram; Amber Jemima Roughley; Caroline Louise Hudson; Suzanne Carolyn Purdy; Kevin James Munro
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 July/Aug       Impact factor: 3.562

4.  Clinical validation of a public health policy-making platform for hearing loss (EVOTION): protocol for a big data study.

Authors:  Giorgos Dritsakis; Dimitris Kikidis; Nina Koloutsou; Louisa Murdin; Athanasios Bibas; Katherine Ploumidou; Ariane Laplante-Lévesque; Niels Henrik Pontoppidan; Doris-Eva Bamiou
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Application of Data Mining to a Large Hearing-Aid Manufacturer's Dataset to Identify Possible Benefits for Clinicians, Manufacturers, and Users.

Authors:  Joseph Mellor; Michael A Stone; John Keane
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Do Hearing Aids Address Real-World Hearing Difficulties for Adults With Mild Hearing Impairment? Results From a Pilot Study Using Ecological Momentary Assessment.

Authors:  Barbra H B Timmer; Louise Hickson; Stefan Launer
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

7.  The Acoustic Environments in Which Older Adults Wear Their Hearing Aids: Insights From Datalogging Sound Environment Classification.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Sara E Rogers; Anna K Main; Dana L Kinney
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 1.493

8.  Direct-to-Consumer Hearing Devices: Capabilities, Costs, and Cosmetics.

Authors:  Ibrahim Almufarrij; Kevin J Munro; Piers Dawes; Michael A Stone; Harvey Dillon
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Hearing Therapy Improves Tinnitus-Related Distress in Mildly Distressed Patients with Chronic Tinnitus and Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss: A Randomized-Controlled Cross-Over Design.

Authors:  Benjamin Boecking; Leonie Rausch; Stamatina Psatha; Amarjargal Nyamaa; Juliane Dettling-Papargyris; Christine Funk; Petra Brueggemann; Matthias Rose; Birgit Mazurek
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Public health policy-making for hearing loss: stakeholders' evaluation of a novel eHealth tool.

Authors:  Giorgos Dritsakis; Lyubov Trenkova; Mariola Śliwińska-Kowalska; Dario Brdarić; Niels Henrik Pontoppidan; Panagiotis Katrakazas; Doris-Eva Bamiou
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2020-10-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.