Johanna Gutenberg1, Panagiotis Katrakazas2, Lyubov Trenkova3, Louisa Murdin4, Dario Brdaric5, Nina Koloutsou6, Katherine Ploumidou7, Niels Henrik Pontoppidan1, Ariane Laplante-Lévesque8,9. 1. Eriksholm Research Centre, Oticon A/S, Denmark. 2. Biomedical Engineering Laboratory, National Technical University of Athens, Greece. 3. Pazardzhik Regional Administration, Bulgaria. 4. Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. 5. Institute of Public Health for the Osijek Baranya County, Croatia. 6. City, University of London, United Kingdom. 7. Athens Medical Group, Greece. 8. Oticon Medical, Denmark. 9. Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Sweden.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The scarcity of health care resources calls for their rational allocation, including within hearing health care. Policies define the course of action to reach specific goals such as optimal hearing health. The process of policy making can be divided into 4 steps: (a) problem identification and issue recognition, (b) policy formulation, (c) policy implementation, and (d) policy evaluation. Data and evidence, especially Big Data, can inform each of the steps of this process. Big Data can inform the macrolevel (policies that determine the general goals and actions), mesolevel (specific services and guidelines in organizations), and microlevel (clinical care) of hearing health care services. The research project EVOTION applies Big Data collection and analysis to form an evidence base for future hearing health care policies. METHOD: The EVOTION research project collects heterogeneous data both from retrospective and prospective cohorts (clinical validation) of people with hearing impairment. Retrospective data from clinical repositories in the United Kingdom and Denmark will be combined. As part of a clinical validation, over 1,000 people with hearing impairment will receive smart EVOTION hearing aids and a mobile phone application from clinics located in the United Kingdom and Greece. These clients will also complete a battery of assessments, and a subsample will also receive a smartwatch including biosensors. Big Data analytics will identify associations between client characteristics, context, and hearing aid outcomes. RESULTS: The evidence EVOTION will generate is relevant especially for the first 2 steps of the policy-making process, namely, problem identification and issue recognition, as well as policy formulation. EVOTION will inform microlevel, mesolevel, and macrolevel of hearing health care services through evidence-informed policies, clinical guidelines, and clinical care. CONCLUSION: In the future, Big Data can inform all steps of the hearing health policy-making process and all levels of hearing health care services.
PURPOSE: The scarcity of health care resources calls for their rational allocation, including within hearing health care. Policies define the course of action to reach specific goals such as optimal hearing health. The process of policy making can be divided into 4 steps: (a) problem identification and issue recognition, (b) policy formulation, (c) policy implementation, and (d) policy evaluation. Data and evidence, especially Big Data, can inform each of the steps of this process. Big Data can inform the macrolevel (policies that determine the general goals and actions), mesolevel (specific services and guidelines in organizations), and microlevel (clinical care) of hearing health care services. The research project EVOTION applies Big Data collection and analysis to form an evidence base for future hearing health care policies. METHOD: The EVOTION research project collects heterogeneous data both from retrospective and prospective cohorts (clinical validation) of people with hearing impairment. Retrospective data from clinical repositories in the United Kingdom and Denmark will be combined. As part of a clinical validation, over 1,000 people with hearing impairment will receive smart EVOTION hearing aids and a mobile phone application from clinics located in the United Kingdom and Greece. These clients will also complete a battery of assessments, and a subsample will also receive a smartwatch including biosensors. Big Data analytics will identify associations between client characteristics, context, and hearing aid outcomes. RESULTS: The evidence EVOTION will generate is relevant especially for the first 2 steps of the policy-making process, namely, problem identification and issue recognition, as well as policy formulation. EVOTION will inform microlevel, mesolevel, and macrolevel of hearing health care services through evidence-informed policies, clinical guidelines, and clinical care. CONCLUSION: In the future, Big Data can inform all steps of the hearing health policy-making process and all levels of hearing health care services.
Authors: Axel Heitmueller; Sarah Henderson; Will Warburton; Ahmed Elmagarmid; Alex Sandy Pentland; Ara Darzi Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Willem G van Panhuis; Proma Paul; Claudia Emerson; John Grefenstette; Richard Wilder; Abraham J Herbst; David Heymann; Donald S Burke Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-11-05 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Alistair E W Johnson; Mohammad M Ghassemi; Shamim Nemati; Katherine E Niehaus; David A Clifton; Gari D Clifford Journal: Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng Date: 2016-01-25 Impact factor: 10.961
Authors: Gabrielle H Saunders; Jeppe H Christensen; Johanna Gutenberg; Niels H Pontoppidan; Andrew Smith; George Spanoudakis; Doris-Eva Bamiou Journal: Ear Hear Date: 2020 Sep/Oct Impact factor: 3.562