| Literature DB >> 28904264 |
Ana Umpiérrez1, Inés Bado2, Martín Oliver1, Sofía Acquistapace1, Analía Etcheverría3, Nora Lía Padola3, Rafael Vignoli2, Pablo Zunino1.
Abstract
Escherichia coli is one of the main etiological agents of neonatal calf diarrhea (NCD). The objective of this study was to assess the presence of virulence genes, genetic diversity, and antibiotic resistance mechanisms in E. coli associated with NCD in Uruguay. PCR was used to assess the presence of intimin, Shiga-like toxin, and stable and labile enterotoxin genes. Resistance to fluoroquinolones and oxyimino-cephalosporins was estimated on Müller-Hinton agar plates. Further antibiotic disc-diffusion tests were performed to assess bacterial multi-resistance. The presence of PMQR, ESBL, MCR-1, and integron genes was evaluated. Isolates were typed using ERIC-PCR, and 20 were selected for MLST, adhesion to Hep-2 cells, in vitro biofilm formation, and eukaryotic cytotoxicity. The prevalence of ETEC genes was lower than 3% in each case (estA and elt). Six isolates were EPEC (eae+) and 2 were EHEC/STEC (eae+/stx1+). The results of a diversity analysis showed high genetic heterogenicity among isolates. Additionally, different sequence types, including ST10, ST21, and ST69, were assigned to selected isolates. Thirty-six percent (96/264) of the isolates were fluoroquinolone-resistant, with 61/96 (63.5%) being multidrug-resistant. Additionally, 6 were oxyimino-cephalosporin-resistant. The qnrB, qnrS1, and blaCTX-M-14 genes were detected, whereas no isolates carried the mcr-1 gene. Isolates had the ability to adhere to Hep-2 cells and form biofilms. Only 1 isolate expressed toxins in vitro. E. coli from NCD cases in Uruguay are very diverse, potentially virulent, and may interact with eukaryotic cells. Zoonotic potential, together with resistance traits and the presence of horizontal transfer mechanisms, may play a significant role in infections caused by these microorganisms.Entities:
Keywords: Escherichia coli; antibiotic multi-resistance; mcr-1; zoonotic potential
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28904264 PMCID: PMC5606698 DOI: 10.1264/jsme2.ME17046
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbes Environ ISSN: 1342-6311 Impact factor: 2.912
Prevalence of E. coli virulence genes
| Symptoms | Healthy | Totalisolates
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 (2.1%) | 3 (4.9%) | 8 (2.6%) | |
| 2 (4.8%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (0.7%) | |
| 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
| 6 (2.5%) | 2 (3.3%) | 8 (2.6%) | |
| 6 (2.5%) | 2 (3.3%) | 8 (2.6%) |
n, number of E. coli isolates recovered from animals with symptoms of diarrhea; n, number of E. coli isolates recovered from healthy animals. Brackets: prevalence of each gene.
Fig. 1Assigned ST, percentage of adhesion to Hep-2 monolayers, and presence of class 1 integrons. (A), E. coli phylogeny of 7 concatenated housekeeping gene sequences using the Neighbor-Joining method. Bootstrap values are a product of 1,000 replicates. (B), Assigned ST, adhesion percentages to the Hep-2 monolayers of bovine E. coli isolates, and the presence of Class 1 integrons. S, animal with symptoms; H, healthy animal. Virotyping: f17, fimbriae 17 gene; clpG, CS31A adhesion gene; f5, fimbriae F5 gene. The presence of F17, F5, and CS31A genes were previously evaluated (55). *, ST not assigned.
Antibiotic resistance profiles and presence of ESBL/PMQR genes
| Profile | Antibiotic resistance profile | No. of isolates | ESBL | PMQR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AMP, FQ, SXT | 36 | ND | — |
| 2 | AMP, FQ, CN, SXT | 14 | ND | |
| 3 | AMP, FQ | 13 | ND | — |
| 4 | FQ | 12 | ND | |
| 5 | FQ, SXT | 4 | ND | |
| 6 | AMP, CXM, FQ, SXT | 4 | ND | — |
| 7 | AMP, AMC, CXM, CTX, CAZ | 3 | ND | — |
| 8 | AMP, AMC, CXM, CTX, CAZ, FEP, FQ | 3 | — | |
| 9 | AMP, FQ, CN | 1 | ND | — |
| 10 | AMP, FQ, SXT, FOS | 1 | ND | — |
| 11 | AMP, FQ, CN, SXT, FOS | 1 | ND | — |
| 12 | AMP, CXM, FQ, SX, FOS | 1 | ND | — |
| 13 | AMP, CXM, FQ, CN, SXT | 1 | ND | |
| 14 | AMP, CIP* | 1 | ND | — |
| 15 | AMP, CIP*, CN, SXT | 1 | ND | |
| 16 | AMP, CIP*, SXT | 1 | ND | — |
| 17 | FQ, CN, SXT | 1 | ND | |
| 18 | Nal, CIP* | 1 | ND | — |
|
| ||||
| Total | 99 | 3 | 7 | |
AMP, Ampicillin; FQ, fluoroquinolones; SXT, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; CN, gentamicin; CXM, cefuroxime; CTX, cefotaxime; CAZ, ceftazidime; FEP, cefepime; AMC, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid; FOS, fosfomycin; CIP*, Low-level ciprofloxacin resistance; Nal, Nalidixic acid.
Brackets: number of isolates showing ESBL (bla+) or PMQR (qnr+) genes within the antibiotic resistance profile.
ND: Not done.
Fig. 2ST distribution of qnr and ESBL E. coli producers. (A), Dendrogram generated with the UPGMA method (GelCompar II). Ten E. coli isolates that showed resistance genes. (B), Assigned ST and resistance genes of bovine E. coli isolates. S, animal with symptoms. H, healthy animal. Virotyping: elt, LT gene (this work); f17, fimbriae 17 gene (previously evaluated [55]). n/e, not evaluated.