Literature DB >> 28904176

The crystal structure of the AhRR-ARNT heterodimer reveals the structural basis of the repression of AhR-mediated transcription.

Shunya Sakurai1, Toshiyuki Shimizu2,3, Umeharu Ohto4.   

Abstract

2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and related compounds are extraordinarily potent environmental toxic pollutants. Most of the 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin toxicities are mediated by aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), a ligand-dependent transcription factor belonging to the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) Per-ARNT-Sim (PAS) family. Upon ligand binding, AhR forms a heterodimer with AhR nuclear translocator (ARNT) and induces the expression of genes involved in various biological responses. One of the genes induced by AhR encodes AhR repressor (AhRR), which also forms a heterodimer with ARNT and represses the activation of AhR-dependent transcription. The control of AhR activation is critical for managing AhR-mediated diseases, but the mechanisms by which AhRR represses AhR activation remain poorly understood, because of the lack of structural information. Here, we determined the structure of the AhRR-ARNT heterodimer by X-ray crystallography, which revealed an asymmetric intertwined domain organization presenting structural features that are both conserved and distinct among bHLH-PAS family members. The structures of AhRR-ARNT and AhR-ARNT were similar in the bHLH-PAS-A region, whereas the PAS-B of ARNT in the AhRR-ARNT complex exhibited a different domain arrangement in this family reported so far. The structure clearly disclosed that AhRR competitively represses AhR binding to ARNT and target DNA and further suggested the existence of an AhRR-ARNT-specific repression mechanism. This study provides a structural basis for understanding the mechanism by which AhRR represses AhR-mediated gene transcription.
© 2017 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  crystallography; dioxin; structural biology; transcription factor; transcription repressor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28904176      PMCID: PMC5663866          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M117.812974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  39 in total

Review 1.  The PAS superfamily: sensors of environmental and developmental signals.

Authors:  Y Z Gu; J B Hogenesch; C A Bradfield
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 13.820

2.  Evidence that the co-chaperone p23 regulates ligand responsiveness of the dioxin (Aryl hydrocarbon) receptor.

Authors:  A Kazlauskas; L Poellinger; I Pongratz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-05-07       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Genetic and molecular aspects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin action.

Authors:  J P Whitlock
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 13.820

Review 4.  The aryl hydrocarbon receptor: a comparative perspective.

Authors:  M E Hahn
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol C Pharmacol Toxicol Endocrinol       Date:  1998-11

5.  Repression of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) signaling by AHR repressor: role of DNA binding and competition for AHR nuclear translocator.

Authors:  Brad R Evans; Sibel I Karchner; Lenka L Allan; Richard S Pollenz; Robert L Tanguay; Matthew J Jenny; David H Sherr; Mark E Hahn
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 6.  Ligand binding and activation of the Ah receptor.

Authors:  Michael S Denison; Alessandro Pandini; Scott R Nagy; Enoch P Baldwin; Laura Bonati
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2002-09-20       Impact factor: 5.192

Review 7.  New Trends in Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Biology.

Authors:  Sonia Mulero-Navarro; Pedro M Fernandez-Salguero
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2016-05-11

8.  NPAS1-ARNT and NPAS3-ARNT crystal structures implicate the bHLH-PAS family as multi-ligand binding transcription factors.

Authors:  Dalei Wu; Xiaoyu Su; Nalini Potluri; Youngchang Kim; Fraydoon Rastinejad
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography.

Authors:  Vincent B Chen; W Bryan Arendall; Jeffrey J Headd; Daniel A Keedy; Robert M Immormino; Gary J Kapral; Laura W Murray; Jane S Richardson; David C Richardson
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-12-21

10.  Phaser crystallographic software.

Authors:  Airlie J McCoy; Ralf W Grosse-Kunstleve; Paul D Adams; Martyn D Winn; Laurent C Storoni; Randy J Read
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 3.304

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Gut microbiota-derived tryptophan metabolism mediates renal fibrosis by aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling activation.

Authors:  Jing-Ru Liu; Hua Miao; De-Qiang Deng; Nosratola D Vaziri; Ping Li; Ying-Yong Zhao
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  Chemoprevention of Colorectal Cancer by Anthocyanidins and Mitigation of Metabolic Shifts Induced by Dysbiosis of the Gut Microbiome.

Authors:  Ashley M Mudd; Tao Gu; Radha Munagala; Jeyaprakash Jeyabalan; Nejat K Egilmez; Ramesh C Gupta
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2019-12-03

3.  Positioning a multifunctional basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor within the Ciona notochord gene regulatory network.

Authors:  Jamie E Kugler; Yushi Wu; Lavanya Katikala; Yale J Passamaneck; Jermyn Addy; Natalia Caballero; Izumi Oda-Ishii; Julie E Maguire; Raymond Li; Anna Di Gregorio
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 3.582

4.  Effect of prevalent polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) food contaminant on the MCF7, LNCap and MDA-MB-231 cell lines viability and PON1 gene expression level: proposed model of binding.

Authors:  Fatemeh Yazdi; Shahram Shoeibi; Mohammad Hossein Yazdi; Akram Eidi
Journal:  Daru       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 5.  The aryl hydrocarbon receptor: A predominant mediator for the toxicity of emerging dioxin-like compounds.

Authors:  Wanglong Zhang; Heidi Qunhui Xie; Yunping Li; Mingxi Zhou; Zhiguang Zhou; Renjun Wang; Mark E Hahn; Bin Zhao
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 14.224

6.  Comparative analysis of interactions between aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand binding domain with its ligands: a computational study.

Authors:  Kumaraswamy Naidu Chitrala; Xiaoming Yang; Prakash Nagarkatti; Mitzi Nagarkatti
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2018-12-06

7.  A Protective Role of Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Repressor in Inflammation and Tumor Growth.

Authors:  Christoph F A Vogel; Yasuhiro Ishihara; Claire E Campbell; Sarah Y Kado; Aimy Nguyen-Chi; Colleen Sweeney; Marius Pollet; Thomas Haarmann-Stemmann; Joseph M Tuscano
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Light-induced complex formation of bacteriophytochrome RpBphP1 and gene repressor RpPpsR2 probed by SAXS.

Authors:  Miroslav Z Papiz; Dom Bellini; Kate Evans; J Günter Grossmann; Tony Fordham-Skelton
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 5.542

9.  The AHR pathway represses TGFβ-SMAD3 signalling and has a potent tumour suppressive role in SHH medulloblastoma.

Authors:  Nemanja Sarić; Matthew Selby; Vijay Ramaswamy; Marcel Kool; Brigitta Stockinger; Christer Hogstrand; Daniel Williamson; Silvia Marino; Michael D Taylor; Steven C Clifford; M Albert Basson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Trajectory Shifts in Interdisciplinary Research of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor-A Personal Perspective on Thymus and Skin.

Authors:  Charlotte Esser
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.